Twitter, etc...Part 3

Another fair question.

and the continuation of this into his first 2 continuations of the tweet below it.

This is based on a little of the premise that 90s and I were getting into in the other thread. My approach aligns with much of what Gummi is stating in these 3 tweets. I’ve never once, on this message board or my everyday life, have insulted anyone getting the vaccine. I have said for 2-3 weeks now that I’m also considering getting it.

I hope you do. Don’t believe the BS that it’ll turn you into a Democrat.

150 million people + have gotten it - with very little issues. Not sure what else people need to realize that it’s a good idea to get it.

Only if you are worried about covid…I am not. It is doing very little, and apparently less by the day against transmission.

I was once a democrat…Basically my whole life until recently lol.

I’m out for the night, later gentlemen

This is false. The vaccine is - at very least - preventing severe disease. That’s not little to nothing.

Have a good night.

“preventing severe”…Not “preventing transmission”…And if you believe the first is simply a form of the second then you, the benefiter of the vaccine, should be fine REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT I GET JABBED.

@skeeter for you

I’m fucking dead :rofl:

Saw it a couple weeks back. Loved it.

How bout this.

0% efficacy

The Daily Beast shreds, and I mean complete annihilation, this “scientist.”

Lmfao

You should be ashamed of yourself.

Shreds her? Or smears her lol.

I don’t find any shredding in that article. I find they don’t like her message and went on a crusade to destroy her credibility… and they failed.

I thought djrion had me block…Nice of him to contribute to my thread

What a cunt.

Can you imagine he lies about blocking people and then comments on their shit.

Like a 12 year old girl.

You didn’t read it then. Actually very well balanced.

While decimating her at the same time.

Just another grifter who enjoys your tax money.

Oh yeah, where?

Oh perhaps you are confused because you don’t understand and comment anyway.

For a blocked user you see:

  1. Post title
  2. Post Author
  3. Nothing else

I’ll wait for you to provide me proof of your "ass"ertion.

I read the entire thing. It’s not balanced. It’s a smear. The article immediately questions her expertise and credentials. It’s clear she is exactly what she says she is.

Some of her peers disagree with her. Yea, and?

They didn’t explain why. They didn’t get into the science of what her claim was. They just chopped at her credibility. Which is a prime example of a smear.

commie make a funny

Man some of you are cornballs

Peers? Lol, the orginazations she belongs to that govern her “specialty” disagree with her.

Report your neighbors for standing too close to one another.

Gestapo comes right away. Right to jail!

I can’t remember if it was Cuomo or DeBlasio who did it - but one of them set up a site for people to send video of people violating the stay at home rules during the beginning of the pandemic.

Most of what people sent him was porn. :joy::joy::joy::joy::joy::joy: