If you don’t care that the highest office in the land was stolen right in front of your eyes that’s your problem. Not mine buddy. Keep being a moron about it. Fine be me.
But it wasn’t. It’s been proven that it wasn’t. But you can’t admit it….so……
No clue how you would prove it wasn’t but whatever dude. Live in your fairytail.
It has been proven.
But whatever dude. Live in your fairytale.
How the hell can you prove that something like this DIDNT happen? Lol
I didn’t realize that the legal standard was not to prove that something DID happen, but actually something that DIDNT happen.
Jesus Christ. Do you dream about this shit? Do you try to fit this into general conversations? If people close to you are avoiding you or trying to shut you down as you begin to talk about it, maybe just stop.
Trump talks about it the most. You’re definitely not far behind.
There is no flip flop
At all
I showed you where underwater drones have already been provided to Ukraine.
You don’t know their capability any more than I do. And the logic flows.
Exhausting. YOU SAID THEY PROVED IT DIDN’T HAPPEN! Lol. Not me.
And then you insinuated that perhaps these drones specifically designed to find and eliminate mines were used to pull off a bridge bombing.
Now prove it asshole. Isn’t that how this works?
I’m the only one that has a burden?
Well, Trump said there was fraud. It’s been proven over and again that there’s no evidence to suggest widespread fraud.
Are you gonna be one of those people who will still be trying to talk about this in 20 years? It’s already over now.
Let’s do that then. Prove to me there’s widespread voter fraud that would have trump millions of votes, and the presidency.
Let’s see it. Nancy.
It is logic.
It is logical.
None of which you have.
Do you really want me to explain the rationale behind it? I can spell it out for you if you need.
I think GSCl 
wn needs an explanation.
GSCl wn asserts bridge bomb could have been an underwater drone. He then asserts that Ukrainians are either too stupid or for some unknown reason (perhaps they haven’t been flying underwater drones with 100 years experience???) that they are incapable.
Dj shows him article where underwater drones were sent to Ukraine months ago.
Dj logic allows us to see that Ukraine isnt as incapable of maneuvering underwater drones for military purposes as GSCl wn thinks. Countries must be sending them expensive underwater drones so that Ukrainians can play ducky in bathtub.
We go through this excersize daily with GSCl wn all bc he is incapable of showing humility and admitting he is wrong. Such an travesty of an unhuman being.
When pride comes, then comes disgrace, but with the humble is wisdom.
I really don’t care whether you do or don’t. Your opinion is one of the least important things I ever consider.
Ahem…. I asserted no such thing. An expert that the BBC interviewed asserted such.
Again- I never said anything like this. All your words buddy.
I am much humble than you are buddy. That’s easy to see.
Classic GSCl wn
Time to run away and hide, never learning in the process
Or you were just wrong? Show some humility and admit it.
Are you claiming you didn’t post an article showing how it could have been an underwater drone instead of a car bomb as an alternate theory?
Those are block quotes you big dummy. It’s a direct quote from the article.
What a dumbass.
I can’t remember a time you’ve admitted you were wrong on this board, minus years ago when you admitted you couldn’t have it both ways regarding our debate on the gay community. And that was years ago.
I just did in this thread. I said I could be wrong. I do that a lot. I’m not obsessed with being right. YOU are obsessed with me being wrong.
And enough with the gay stuff. You always have to bring that up. It’s your personal mission, huh?
I know what block quotes are you fucking imbecile. I’ll state the question again for GSCl wn: Why did you use the quotes from the article?
Quit
Dancing
Around
The
Question
As his nose continues to grow