Wisconsin Supreme Court

Storm Shelter
1

Citation:

https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617

1 Like
3

This is probably a good ruling.

This stuff was contested even before the election and is independent of any fraud claims. There were a lot of emergency covid measures that overrode laws, and some of that was questionable or even illegal.

1 Like
4

GSC won’t view it that way

5

IM SUCH A PANSY THAT I CANT ADMIT I LOST!!!

6

How could it be independent of fraud claims when it covers the 2020 election and the main fraud claim was the very issue they are covering?

Now I agree they didn’t dive into the fraud issue…. But it’s a massive indictment and moreover, vindication for Al of us who have been screaming from the rooftops.

As always- we’re always late but right.

7

Nothing burger

They know they can’t win outright, so they want to limit opportunities for people to vote.

Why make voting easier with terrible turnouts?

1 Like
8

Says the guy who thinks women have a lower chance of getting pregnant due to rape

9

These last 2 responses should tell everyone all they need to know.

10

Expanding opportunities to vote is a way to attract more people. Since we want more people to vote, we need to encourage opportunities and accessibility, not deny them.

11

All those responses of of no proof of election fraud tell us all we need to know.

12

Not if you’re trumps crew

13

You should get people to vote that actually want to vote, not coerce or encourage them to vote through financial means or otherwise.

If low information people don’t take an interest in voting, it should be up to them to decide to vote.

Voter access is fine, but not at the expense of making it easier to cheat.

14

Um, what?

15

This case itself is proof! Read their findings!!!

1 Like
16

DJ,

Just saying that voting should be for folks that actually want to vote and care about it, not let’s see how many disinterested folks who don’t care either way that we can pull to our side.

17

To cheat

18

  1. There were MANY fraud claims, most of which had nothing to do with this.

  2. This is relegated to Wisconsin law only.

  3. The votes in question could have been for any candidate.

Well, sure. Any Supreme Court decision in a vindication for whoever won the case. Now the people who complained about the drop boxes in Wisconsin way before the election finally got their “win.” And I would agree the law was probably on their side.

1 Like
19

This isn’t about sides. It is about attempting to fix a terribly antiquated system by not beating our head against a wall doing nothing. Year 2022 using a system where people stand around in lines for hours at a time is like Fred Flintstone driving a car.

20

And with more votes to drown those outliers out even further.

Just like any cheating today (by pubs mind you) didn’t affect the election outcome, the same would hold true with more votes in the box (pun intended).

21

Sure. Proof that he (and you) can’t move on from the fact that Trump lost.