What? Maybe it’s about educating people who don’t care about voting why it is important and why they should care.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled today that absentee ballot drop boxes, a primary means by which Democrats corruptly rigged the 2020 election, are illegal now and were illegal during the 2020 election. https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617
Saying drop boxes for ballots are illegal doesn’t mean election fraud happened.
Jeez y’all are sobbing about this over a year and a half later. 
No? Then what does it mean?
1 Like
That it’s not a normally - accepted process?
Doesn’t mean fraud happened. Still, you believe Mr. 1-68 in court.
Do you think drop boxes COULD have been used in a less than ethical manner and are you good not having them?
Do you think Mark Zuckerberg’s 417 Million dollars spent to defeat Donald Trump with drop boxes in swing states did nothing in terms of the election?
All good right?
1 Like
Sure. It’s possible.
Prove it first before stating it happened.
They said it was ILLEGAL. That means CRIMINAL.
And unless you can figure out a different crime than fraud regarding elections….
EXACTLY YOU LOST NOW FORMER FAKE MODERATOR ……
TIME TO MAN UP AND PAY UP LIKE YOU WERE SAYING FCK FACE….
STORM TOLD YOU YOU NEVER WON BUT LIKE THE LITTLE STUPID PIECE OF SHIT LITTLE BITCH YOU ARE YOU CLAIMED VICTORY ANYWAY……
WELL IT IS GAME OVER NOW PUSSY….
He will ignore and deflect and then lie.
You are truly a moron.
You’re using this as a way to say that because a process may have been ruled to be unlawful that voter fraud automatically happened.
You realize these are two entirely different things right?
Are we not baning the human excrement any more?
Nah- you’re free to stay- shit smell and all.
Really? Where are the criminal charges?
Is this really your dumb logic? How is a thinking person even supposed to respond to such a non-point? You think you’re proving something but you’re just rambling.
GSCl 
wn strikes again
The court gave the county election officials an “out” and basically inferred they “the advice they gave was wrong”
They call it “advice” and elude to it being illegal. They could easily infer fraud and it’s the same situation with a criminal referral.
The court wants to remain politically neutral. But we can all read between the lines.
LOL. Eternal butt hurt
You’re not reading between the lines.
You’re “inferring” “fraud.”
Which is what you’ve been doing since Day 1.
He’s lost.
Let’s remember - this is the same guy who says that women who are raped are less likely to get pregnant.
I don’t care what side of the abortion argument you’re on. Its the second dumbest thing I’ve ever heard/read.
The other is when Trump said we should try to inject disinfectant.
Let me guess…you sheep will?
Nothing burger
They know they can’t win outright, so they want to limit opportunities for people to vote.
Why make voting easier with terrible turnouts?
Translation: Why make cheating more difficult when it can be so easy?