Ummm no dipshit…We all knew they would “end it” when they felt like it and when it would most benefit them…
You assholes couldn’t get enough of it.
Lmfao- we’ve ALWAYS said the time will come when they will expediently discharge the word of COVID. And it’s here.
3 months ago you gave a dissertation of the 5 steps of a pandemic and claimed we are still in step 1. Guess Fauci played you for a fucking idiot huh. Lol.
Exactly, and a lot of people were predicting that the lockdowns would be extended to help in the midterm vote. This is me here saying they were wrong.
You’re such a disingenuous idiot you don’t even bother checking what that post was about. You can’t even articulate HOW Fauci “played me.”
Phase 1 is the Pandemic.
Phase 2 is Deceleration, a slowing down of cases.
Phase 3 is Control, where it is endemic. This was our target. This is entirely what Fauci’s latest announcement is about.
“We’re really in a transitional phase, from a deceleration of the numbers into hopefully a more controlled phase and endemicity,” Fauci told The Washington Post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/04/27/pandemic-phase-over-fauci-covid/
And what was it I said about the stages?
So if you mean that Fauci “played me” by saying what was gonna happen months in advance and then it happening, damn are you right.
Honestly, for someone supposedly “gifted”, I would be embarrassed if I were you coming into this forum and saying such dumb shit all the time.
1 Like
GSClown
Nothing else needs to be stated.
-
Makes up his own definitions
-
Makes up a different reality from what the rest of the world reads in writing
-
Refuses to research topics cause he knows it all
-
Puts false ideological claims on others that he dreams up to make himself feel better about his weak intellect
-
Gets called out over every sentence typed
Wash and fucking repeat.
Suddenly we have control? Hahahaha! Hilarious.
Even Fauci has to hedge and say “hopefully”
GTFOH dude. All bullshit and you’re king spewer of the bullshit for this admin.
Nope- always back up “my” definitions with etymologies.
Now YOU know what “the rest of the world sees?” Or are you actually saying “from what the media tells us?”
This is an outright lie. YOU are the one that refuses to research and has demanded others to research for your lazy ass.
You don’t like being revealed for what you are. I get it. It’s ugly. I’m over 10 years YOU are the only person that repeatedly says people (on this board and in general) should be killed for their beliefs.
By whom? The gallery liberal idiots that have confirmation bias? And? What’s your point?
The system is set up to assist your mouth breathers at every turn. It’s the contrarians that always end up being right in the long run. Not you guys. As illustrated in this thread.
- No matter how many people tell him he is wrong, he still doesn’t get it.
Confirmation bias king is telling people they have confirmation bias
L
M
F
A
O
I prefer “serial contrarian” thank you very much.
I’ve been open about being a complete skeptic to official narratives. I wear that badge proudly and it’s served me well. What’s your point?
You mean how YOU have changed certain words to fit the definition you want? If so, absolutely agree.
1 Like
When you think you are smarter than the rest of the world, the world confirms to you!!!
No- I mean how words have been defined by their origins since the beginning of time and how they derive their meaning.
Conveniently leaving out how meaning changes over time…
But they really don’t as I’ve demonstrated to you repeatedly. A word aways keeps a form of its original meaning.
Again, you are an idiot. Do you really want me to embarrass you again?
semantic change or semantic drift
Lexical cognates
False cognates
Etymological dictionaries
Thankfully we have linguists who study this stuff for a living and can help us avoid people whom are hell bent on lying to prove a point in which they know NOTHING about.
Lmfao! You are a complete idiot. That says NOTHING about any of the words we’ve debated.
It is speaking to “many” words…. Meaning “a certain amount of words” who’s etymology is called into question.
Here’s an example. The word “dog.” It’s not found in history and cannot be traced to any further than ancient English (olde English).
That’s what your little blurb is discussing. It’s not relevant for words that have deeply researched and agreed upon etymologies such as, wait for it, conspire.
Now beat it you dork.
Sure, Cliff. Sure.
What was “suddenly” about it? And according to Fauci, we are TRANSITIONING into a “hopefully” “more” controlled phase.
You really are a riot, man. Not an honest bone in your body.
Good thing he’s not calling people names because they don’t agree with him, character assassinations and what not, right?
What a hypocrite
So he finally admits he is wrong, albeit tacitly.
The prob is that he doesn’t understand himself when he does admit to being wrong.
That’s a shit ton of mental gymnatlstics.
It’s actually pretty straightforward. You just don’t have the mental capacity to understand. I never claimed that every word is etymologically sound. But 99% of the human lexicon is etymologically sound, Meaning 99% of all words we have can be traced back to an ancient root word with a meaning where the present meaning is derived. You are attempting to use the exception to prove the rule, to win an argument.