Removed
Thatâs crazy that no blacks were murdered by whitesâŚDo you have a link to those numbers Bikki?
It is interestingâŚNot quite trying to make the point Bikki is or win any argument. Not sure there even is one. But in the grander scheme it does relate to some narratives and points back to common sense with all the BLM nonsense.
I believe in America historically 80% of whites are murdered by whitesâŚand 90% of blacks are murdered by blacks.
Deleted
WTF even is this post?
My guess is the numbers against bikkiâs âargumentâ started adding up so he took the whole thing down.
The sad thing is, bikki SHOULD realize that whatever source he got that â0 black killedâ number from is not credible. He should learn a lesson here. Instead he will probably pretend it never happened.
1 Like
Sounds about right.
Interesting. Were they keeping racial crime statistics throughout the history of America and does that include the million plus who died on the way over?
I doubt itâŚNon-pertinent though obviously
Itâs quite pertinent, actually. Below is your EXACT quote. If you donât have the statistical data, how the fuck are you stating âhistorically 80% of whites are murdered by whitesâŚand 90% of blacks are murdered by blacks.â?
Look it upâŚYouâll see Iâm not far off. Read it on the home page of whatever crime department (FBI maybe?). Did the research last some point during the last year or two.
Must you spazz/troll about everything?
What I mean is they didnât keep those statistics until somewhat recently, so saying something has âhistoricallyâ been this or that with regard to crime statistics and race is simply bullshit. Again, how far back did they keep records of that? 70s, 80s? Howâs that âhistoricallyâ?
Stop making shit up and you wonât get called out on it. If I was trolling, Iâd act like you and just call people names. Iâm stating a verifiable point and asking you to back up your statement and youâre acting like a little bitch about it, whining, calling people names, etc.
Stop being a little girl and man up
This threadâs an example of people arguing just for the sake of it.
Bikki posted some dumb-ass shit, and then skeeter posted an admittedly half-assed side comment that was neither here nor there, and then Warden needs to call him out for some reason (best i can tell is skeeterâs use of the word âhistoricallyâ), and all of a sudden people are debating a point that Iâm not sure anybody explicitly disagreed with.
The 93%/84% statistic is pretty meaningless. The majority of homicides are by people who know the victim. Just like skeeter Iâll stick an âI believeâ in there.
Originally I posted a comment featuring photos of three dozen white murders victims, killed during the month of July 2022 at the hands of black perps, many of whom having long rap sheets. These crimes were extracted from local news sources rather than larger media outlets. Searching for interracial crime, I had a difficult time finding a single example of a white person murdering a black while the reverse revealed a spate of examples of a bloody July for white people. Then I pondered whether past statistical data would remain reliable, and I concluded that times are changing fostering a need for white and Asian citizens to be more vigilant and take enhanced security precautions. Presently, whites are thirteen times more likely than blacks to be victims of interracial homicide.
Since I make frequent trips to Mobile, Biloxi, and New Orleans, Iâve grown accustomed to carrying a concealed weapon. Heretofore, I havenât carried one in Pensacola, not feeling the need since I live in an extremely peaceful neighborhood where Iâve never felt need to lock my doors.
I now have put into effect new security cameras on my house. In addition, I have two new pistols hidden in my home together with one I carry everywhere. Under my bed, I have an AR-15 with a laser site. Once a week now, I take Lisa to the firing range where we practice, and have met a bevy of nice folks. Lastly, I now lock my doors.
Because it goes without saying that it isnât back to the 19th centuryâŚI donât remember, but for some reason the year 2012 is popping in my head. I donât believe the statistics included 2021 though. So Iâd say 10, 20 years, something to that effect. So yes the word âhistoricallyâ still applies. And nothing I said implied that thistory had to include 30,50, 100 years ago. 5 years still qualifies as historically, and if consistent within every year then it definitely applies.
Stop making shit up and you wonât get called out on I
Iâm not making it upâŚGoogle it. You fuckin people are just weird. Distraught typesâŚNever will understand you maniacs.
LolâŚShocking huh.
But anyways, if I get a chanceâŚI will look further. Doubt it thoughâŚIâm busy as fuck with football starting soon. Both sides seem higher to me than what I readâŚThe numbers were 90(maybe even a bit higher, 91âŚbut not a big deal) to about 80%. It may have been a post or argument on here back during the BLM bullshit that made me do research on it in first place.
I agree with this.
Weâve only kept racial data on crime statistics since 1980. So, how can you cite what is âhistoricalâ when you can only go back to 1980? Tell me, what about the data going back further? Letâs even just take it to 1776 and youâve got 248 years. Going back to 1980, youâre talking about 16% of our nationâs history and calling it âhistoricalâ in a blanket sense. If you donât have the data, how can you make the statement? Iâm not even disputing the notion, just stating that if you are only accounting for 16% of the timeline, how can you make the statement with literally no data to back it up? Also, if weâre going to cite âhistoricallyâ, then we have to go back to the beginning, right? Well, then you have to account for literally millions of people being owned as slaves, with no rights, being murdered and raped and sold off on the whim. You just going to pretend that time frame didnât happen? I mean, shitâŚwanna really go back? There were upwards of 73 million natives when we got here. It got down to a bit under 250k in the late 1800s. Whoâs violent, again?
GSC, of course, is just a dishonest person. Heâll lie on a daily basis. You, Skeeter, are a dick and a little cheerleader for the right, but you donât outright lie.
That makes no sense. Itâs not 2015 either. Itâs not 1990. Itâs not 1980âŚso what? You stated 'historically" and then when called out, your justification is we arenât in history so we donât need to account for it? What the fuck are you talking about?
The point of using the word âhistoricallyâ is to account for history. Are you fucking retarded?
You want to start history at 2012? You only want to go back 5 years for a âhistoricalâ claim involving crime statistics? What a slag
I mean, what the fuck are you even talking about? You donât believe we should account for history when claiming a historical notion, then want to begin history at 2012, 5 years, whichever year works to fit your narrative because somehow you have it in your head? Is it that youâre dumb, dishonest, or just canât stop yourself from trying to make a racial point and donât have the integrity to defend your words?
Ok then just substitute the word âusuallyââŚJesus fuck
You want to start history at 2012? You only want to go back 5 years for a âhistoricalâ claim involving crime statistics?
When the results are the same for 5 years we clearly have a trendâŚNo? I would hypothesize that 2005 isnât significantly different. But hey weâll leave that out of it for now. Point stands, this isnât rocket science.
I mean, what the fuck are you even talking about? You donât believe we should account for history when claiming a historical notion, then want to begin history at 2012, 5 years, whichever year works to fit your narrative because somehow you have it in your head? Is it that youâre dumb, dishonest, or just canât stop yourself from trying to make a racial point and donât have the integrity to defend your words?
What in the living fuck are you talking about here? I didnât make the post in an argumentative manner or to prove any type of racial point. Read 305âs post for yesterday. Your distraught, tantrum-prone ass is spazzing over nothingâŚStarting an argument where there is none.
okay.
Well, there is one, actually. If you want to by âhistoricalâ standards, Iâd go back hundreds of years and the white on black crime rate would be astoundingly different than in modern, post 1970âs statistics.
Also, some days youâre a dickface for the sake of it and so am I.