@Warden84 why do Republican dominated states such as Nevada and Arizona extend their counting duties so long? To make it sweeter when Dems cross the finish lines? 
The basic logic with these folksâŠI mean, they spent 2 fucking years attacking those states over their vote counts, making them recount over and over again, threatening the lives of the poll workersâŠand then are surprised they take time to verify their counts the following election.
Headcases, dude.
Nice to see you kissed and made up with your little extremist faggot loverâŠDid you two come to an agreement that your friendship in Dallas is ok or is Dallas kinda like a secret closet friend now?
And you sound like a fucking idiot across the board in this thread. Also, last I checked AZ was red last election and Nevadaâs been blue a while so you cunts, as usual, are incorrectâŠ
And for the record, I never said a partisan thing in any of this. I simply said this is bullshit and the system needs changed.
For the record in the last 10 daysâŠwe are now at 23 of the 45 most recent postsâŠStarted by this wack job.
Heâs âstableâ ya know.
For those keeping track at homeâŠArizona magically slows down as Nevada draws closer. I mean we canât see Arizonaâs results til we know how Nevada goes right?
Comedy.
Why put any of this into play?
Itâs a joke. 305 and Warden and DJ can claim process and state procedures and whatever they want, but this isnât the way a vote should take place.
Ask yourself a simple question, whatâs the harm in finishing the counting in a day?
Also, why are Democrats so resistant to changing the ability to vote a month before the election and count the votes weeks past the election?
They must just really care about the ability to vote, right?
Total joke and no defending it. And before Warden comes in here, I donât care if itâs Republicans or Democrats in charge. Itâs a joke.
Breaking their own laws
Getting the count wrong
We can always pay more workers and raise your taxes if youâd like?
Lol ^^^
Fuckin clown
Letâs count some of the things we could exchange some tax money forâŠ
And changing laws was ok with mail-in voting right? But not now right? And their laws are contributing to the fuckeryâŠSimple fixes here. No downside
Run and play partisan cuntâŠ
Again for those taking scoreâŠThe Arizona tally hasnât moved forward since AT LEAST early afternoon.
LolâŠAgain, prove to me they arenât watching Nevada before proceeding. And why not take this out of play so we can make sure?
Indiana, weâve been over this before.
Itâs the REPUBLICANS who have blocked early counting efforts.
But Iâm glad that youâre not defending it at least.
1 Like
That site and the Onion are great.
None at all, but, itâs never happened. Ask yourself a simple questionâŠwhat has it ever happened? If it has never happened, then why are you so up in arms over it right now?
Translated - why are the Dems so resistant to only counting the votes the GOP wants to count
Hereâs a simple oneâŠwhy do you want to not count all of the votes?
Thatâs not accurate. You show it regularly and on this thread. YOU VERY MUCH CARE if Republicans are in charge. I can post you several of YOUR posts if youâd like to dispute
I mean, youâre all worried about election securityâŠI wonder why the Republicans blocked all attempted action under Trump
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/482569-senate-gop-blocks-three-election-security-bills/
https://www.axios.com/2020/02/11/gop-senator-election-security-blocks
Iâm asking for results on election night or the day after, not 1-2 weeks after the fact. California is still counting votes.
I get it that mail in ballots are the issue. Fix the issue. We shouldnât have results coming in days and weeks apart.
Yet againâŠcan you name one election in modern history that didnât have the exact same issues? I have no issue at all with immediate results, but to pretend itâs a huge problem now and is indicative of fraud is dishonest.
Again, Iâve even posted examples from years and years agoâŠsame shit. It always takes time. I even broken down how long it physically takes to do this and how many you can count in an allotted time period. You say you know what the issue is and to fix the issue. The issue is how long it physically takes to count, thatâs the issue youâre having. YET, your GOP wants to remove machines from the process and openly ignores physical threats on people working at those office, making it harder to get people there. Also, Arizona was run by the GOP. Staffing those wasnât run by Biden.
How, exactly, do you not see the idiocy of your position?
Every election in modern history had long counts
You want the election votes to be 100% counted in 1-2 days.
Your party is fighting against machines doing the counting; people count slower than machines
Your party attacked the results of the votes in the last election in AZ and NV and forced several recounts, with the same results as a conclusion
Your party was in charge of staffing those elections
Your party openly condoned or ignored violent attacks on those same people working at those same locations, making it much more difficult to staff
I meanâŠhow exactly do you not understand this? The irony is that the problem youâre having is how long it takes to count, to literally countâŠas if counting is a new problem
Quoted for posterity
I hear you in principle, but keep in mind that even Florida is still not 100% finished with their count. Florida is still processing vote-by-mail ballots. By law they have 10 days AFTER election day to do it.
Yet you have people like skeeter swearing that this âfuckeryâ only happens in swing states that go blue. Itâs a false narrative.
This is a very normal process and it has been this way for years. We can discuss reform, but pretending the usual method is proof of fraud is a stretch at best, and more likely a disingenuous cop-out.
I never claimed it was fraudulent. I just said that itâs crazy that the election process starts a month before the election and ends several weeks after.