A Muslim immigrant attempted to rape an Austrian woman. The woman fought him off using a knife she had in her purse. Wounded the man grabbed her purse and ran away. The police captured him. Nothing was reported about the incident for three days. The government decided to act on it. The government charged the woman, an intended rape victim, with “bodily harming” the man who tried to rape her.
Kumbayah, kumbayah, there is strength in diversity!
No Warden. Strength is in unity in spite of diversity.
Infowars is much akin to the blind squirrel finding a nut. In this case, the squirrel succeeded.
Appointing such a person to a department head is atrocious and makes a mockery of government. It is akin to allowing Muslim women to wear headresses and Jewish men to wear kippas. in the military. Neither military men nor women should have beards, and all should have short haircuts. There is also a professional manner of appearance for government workers out of respect for the citizens of this nation. Next, you’ll advocate those who serve our nation all to be wearing Daisy Dukes.
Tradition 51. Read about what happened to the Roman legions when tradition was lost. The military must have strict discipline and encourage unity not diversity. It must operate as a team much akin to how athletic teams operate. The military is not a leftist freak show.
It doesn’t get much worse than a guy on Info Wars coming out and saying over and over that the murder of a bunch of 6 year olds was a false flag operation. IMO Jones in the top 3 most vile “things” (can’t even call him human) in the country.
Ah, tradition. We had a tradition of peaceful transfer of power until the Trump confederates showed up at the Capitol. Bikki, like most conservatives, care about things like your hair style while celebrating an insurrection in the country. These are the same people who care about standing for the anthem, but not what the actual anthem and flag mean. It’s all superficial, skin deep.
The question at bar sort to speak is not the reputation of Infowars but the truth embodied in the article. In this case, Infowars was correct. I notice even MSNBC gets one right every once in a while. This thread has nothing whatsoever to do with the reputation of inforwars. It’s about a terrible injustice visited upon a citizen of Austria by a Muslim immigrant, and the victim of the attack charged with injuring the attempted rapist.
The story, written by Paul Joseph Watson, cited Remix News. Remix News is a known fake news website out of Budapest, Hungary, working closely with the Hungarian government. It is shut down currently. Now, at the bottom he lists 3 links to corroborate his narrative, all from Summit News. Oddly enough, he’s the very writer of said stories from Summit News, another fake news organization. It’s a curious method to cite yourself as the source to prove your narrative, and even more odd he would cite himself from another website, as if to lend credence to it.
Now, the only real source is the Kronen Zeitung, but in reading the comments (as we’re not familiar with Austrian legal procedure here in the US) is this is somewhat standard and a summary judge will view it as self defense and that’s that, but the charging of someone carrying a knife who stabs another person several times who’s found a mile away bleeding out requires a bit of an investigation. The man who attempted rape was arrested, however.
“After the first medical aid, the handcuffs clicked for the 24-year-old. The man is a Syrian asylum seeker who is said to have a lot on his plate. When he was arrested, the suspect had alcohol in his blood and a small amount of marijuana in his pocket. The Syrian initially denied the crime.”
Also, it never says the victim was charged, only that the prosecutors office reported the woman for “bodily harm.” She’s not been arrested.
I mean we can easily substitute “bikki” for “warden” and “CNN” NYTimes” “Wapo” or any other MSM source over the past 6 years for “infowars” and get the same conclusion.
My post is about justice not about the Austrian legal code. Was it justice to charge this woman for protecting herself against rapist. Of course not. Inforwars was telling the truth on this one, validating the blind squirrel reference.
With your paranormal sense of propriety relative to accuracy in media, I refer you to the Washington Post and New York Times coverage of the Russian hoax, likely the greatest political crime since Watergate, actually worse than Watergate. The myriad Pulitzer prizes for journalism in reporting this hoax should all be rescinded. Finally, a real insurrection has been discovered. Where is the exhaustive MSM coverage of this hoax?
You liberals have really hitched your saddles to a nag. Biden is a disaster for the Democrat Party. I’ve never seen a leader able only to muster a 16% approval rating in the great State of West Virginia, home of my favorite Democrat senator. Juxtaposing the achievements of the two most recent administrations, only a fool would continue support of Biden.
Really? Prove it. Show me where she has been “charged.”
Not a hoax. The Mueller Report proved it. 16 people were charged. Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Because Donnie the conman called it a hoax doesn’t make it a hoax.
Whereas you hitched your wagon to con-man who was twice impeached, lost the House and the Senate, and has more criminal investigations towards him than the mafia.
Wrong again Warden. There would be no Mueller Report were it not for the dossier which was a fiction paid for by Hillary Clinton.
The American people were swindled in the election which nearly saw the House fall into Republican, control. Republicans only lost the senate as a result of a crooked Georgia senatorial election.
Putting the election aside, and back to juxtaposing, Trump was eminently more successful than Biden, especially in the realm of foreign policy.