Yes, my previous arguments were that Of COURSE the count cannot be 100% accurate
Lol…It better damn well be within reason if they are going to double and triple down on the bullshit like they did.
Yes, my previous arguments were that Of COURSE the count cannot be 100% accurate
Lol…It better damn well be within reason if they are going to double and triple down on the bullshit like they did.
85% is huger and is “mostly accurate.”
Lol…No it’s not.
You people have funny definitions nowadays.
85% is literally “mostly” by the dictionary definition.
So is 50.01%
Hey look, someone gets math. Happy to agree with you, brother.
Yawn…Like 15% less deaths isn’t more signifcant
Quit embarrassing yourself here, you two-faced sheep
It is significant. I just said I believe covid death numbers are mostly accurate. So far I’ve been proven right.
You used to argue that an undercount was more likely.
That’s why I said + or - 10-15 %. That gives leeway for an overcount or an undercount. Either way, I believe the US covid numbers are mostly accurate.
I love going back a couple of years and seeing what people said then versus now. Cool thread.
I think what you’re showing is that I’ve been consistent, no? Here’s what you quoted:
Look, are some people falsely counted? OF COURSE. Sheer probability will speak to that.
Are other people uncounted? OF COURSE. Sheer probability speaks to that too.
It’s okay to disagree where the exact number is. I personally think we’re undercounting total deaths – but let’s not sidetrack on that.
My entire point in this thread is that PAN’s assertion that only 6% of cases are legit is COMPLETELY LAUGHABLE.
I stand by all that. It is okay not to agree on exact numbers, I do personally think we’ve probably undercounted, and I’m not super interested in convincing anybody of anything exact, beyond the point that I think the numbers are mostly accurate. I mean, I even bolded my main point in the above quote for you, and it is hilariously the SAME EXACT THING I’ve been repeating in this thread.
That second quote is about a study bill posted. I was explaining to bill what my reading of the study was. That’s clear by the text.
Skeeter’s the one who follows this up with an idiotic argument that it’s impossible that even a single person went uncounted. I mean, absolutely no one believes what he’s saying is even possible.
Another funny thing is, GSC, you agreed with me when I said 75% of those deaths were directly attributable to covid, and that was without counting pneumonia, which is the majority of deaths. (Yes it was fun to read the whole thread.)
The Axis of Evil
Damn right you guys are. Wear that red flag proud
Snatch you by your goatee.
Fuck you and your whore mother you commmie cunt
Oh I stand by that 10000 Fucking percent…The net differences in inaccuracies are so one-sided it is ridiculous
Do you really think these mfers making up reasons to call something a covid death, would dare let an actual covid death slide through? You gotta be kidding me. So few of this happened it’s not worth mentioning.
And god damn did I own those fucking threads or what? 305 was exposed then and he’s exposed now…Pure sheep.
Believe me, brother, I know you do.
Yeah. This proves you’re stupid.
Says the stupid cunt motherfucker who had to be taught basic math and definitions of simple English words.
You gotta be an absolute covid cultist to believe the covid death toll is accurate…You mfers have embarrassed yourself dying on this cross for about 18 months
Because I’m not a covid cultist like yourself