Yep. And legally, you’re wrong. 
Ok cool- show me where I’m wrong. Show me where a criminal referral from Congress has led to a DOJ investigation and an indictment?.
We’ve been down this road before. Just because it may have never happened before doesn’t mean it can’t. Congress was given power to make criminal referrals to the DOJ, who could decide to prosecute (or not).
But it happened to your guy and you don’t like that.
You guys simply don’t understand the significance of what I’m saying.
They went against their own standards. Standards that they’ve practice for centuries all because of one reason.
The guy they are after is a threat to their political power.
That is absolutely unacceptable.
It’s why you can’t get me one example.
Interesting choice of words. Because you simply don’t understand the significance of 1/6. Hence the precedent.
You know what else is unacceptable? Lying about election fraud, knowing you’re full of shit to illegally stay in power, and inciting your supporters to do something to the capital that hasn’t happened since the British set it on fire.
Tell me why it should never happen simply because it is rare?
All this is is you deflecting away from the need to hold these idiots accountable.
I’ve already explained it to you
The criminals feign, then eventual spill the beans to avoid indictment later on. Go looked at you “wiki” list that you so proudly pointed out.
This is what you call severe ownage right here.
Yes, and I notice you haven’t answered Warden’s question over whether the act is illegal or not.
This is my point. It’s not illegal to break precedent.
Did you whine about breaking precedent when McConnell refused to seat Obama’s Supreme Court nominee? Or 4 years later when he broke his previous precedent and did the opposite to quick-approve Trump’s nominee?
Did you whine when Republicans broke Senate tradition by appointing federal judges against the wishes of the opposing state senators?
Of course you didn’t. You don’t give a shit about tradition, you just give a shit about winning. And you’ll use whatever dumb argument you can think of to defend your party’s actions, and when those arguments fail, you won’t change your conclusion anyway because, let’s face it, the arguments never mattered.
Good old fashioned GSC arse kicking right here.
I never said what they did was illegal. That is the argument you guys are attempting to slip in.
I fully understand that Congress CAN do this LEGALLY.
I’m saying that they are intentionally shirking their normal process and the only reason is because it’s a “must defeat” political opponent.
What a dork you are Chester.
You still don’t understand my point. Go figure.
51 in this thread
I stopped reading here.
Oh, I understand it completely. But I think your point is wrong.
Look at GSC trying to save face after getting owned.
Just ghost the thread already. After all, you’re famous for it after getting proven wrong.
Lol- no one care where you started or stopped reading.
Lol- since you stopped reading lmao, let me explain it to you.
No one owned me. I never once said what they did wasn’t “legal.” Or that it was “illegal.”
I even went through the trouble of explaining exactly what Congress can and can’t do and it was included in one of the options.
My entire point is that they absolutely never go this route and in the very few times they tried, the DOJ was like, “nah, no thanks” because it’s straight politics.
And no one cares about your biased opinion.
And I’m trying to tell you that it’s not “straight politics.” I’m telling you that Trump will certainly have a legacy. But it won’t be a good one. You deny and deflect what happened because you can’t bring yourself to admit you’re wrong. But what he did was beyond unacceptable. And while you’ll deny it, I find it odd that you go real quiet when I ask you if you’d have been ok with Gore doing it in 2000.
Stop being butt hurt that Trump lost. Focus on 2024.
I’m not gonna say they have never been forced to go this route but how many times have they been forced to go to it?
Answer the damn question
You keep running from it. You keep repeating the same thing over and over.
Nah- you’re just an idiot.
Each time it was attempted it was obvious political theatre (by either side in charge).
The DOJ has to accept. This is a 2 part system .
But now we have an Uber political establishment and an equally political DOJ.
Now let’s finish the Clown here:
Should the DOJ not prosecute contempt of Congress if someone doesn’t show up?
What teeth would Congress have if everyone could ignore Congressional subpoenas?
Lastly, what fucking world do you live in?
……or…….a moron who got subpoenaed could have just showed up, pleaded the 5th and walked.
But whatever.
You cried yourself to sleep the night you realized trump lost, didn’t you?
GSC?