Quick 51! @Stormfront liked my posts. Delete them!
1 Like
What? More than one witness to 1/6 (Flynn is one of them) pleaded the 5th after being given a subpoena. Itâs entirely relevant to the topic.
And Iâll ask you a question that Iâve asked you multiple times - a question you refuse to answer:
You make a bet with a man and you lose, you honor it. Yes?
I canât wait for your silence.
1 Like
Guy legit struggles with his own eye sight
This dude is such a side seat driver. Attention whore, no oneâs talking to you.
You should thank him for giving you a reason not to respond to me.
Zero integrity.
1 Like
Stop stealing corny lines from warden. Be original.
Yet another non response. See my answer to you in the law enforcement thread. You do this over and over.
Thatâs a lie. He wanted to testify in public WAAAAAY after he cited executive privilege and refused to cooperate.
I already stated this. Youâve offered nothing new.
Your first post on the subject:
Howâd that go?
Did you say it there? NopeâŚmaybe the 2nd post
Did you say it there? Nope, you doubled down on your bullshit. A reminder, this guy was stealing from Trump supporters and got caught, pardonedâŚagain, pardoned for stealing from Trump supporters by Trump. Canât make this stuff up
Did you say it in your third post?
Nope
4th post?
Did you say it in your 5th post?
Yes, kind ofâŚexcept that youâre AGAIN being dishonest about it.
First, you lump them together. Secondly, you LIE about the committee ignoring assertion of executive privilege. Thatâs a flat out lie. The committee heard the assertion and rejected it. First, Trump never invoked executive privilege over Bannonâs subpeona. Secondly, the judge heard the assertion, weighed it, and rejected it. Also, he was not a member of the Trump administration on Jan 6.
Bannon doesnât get to decide how he complies with the law.
A flat out, 100% lie. He went to court with a defense lawyer, they made their case, and rested. His own lawyer, David Schoen, didnât request to have Bannon testify.
Like always, you just do not have the ability to be honest.
Lmfao, really? Way to hide and dodge, liar.
GSCl 
wn
I wouldnât be surprised if Bannon sees token jail time because of how much he flaunted the fact that he was breaking the law.
The best part is now he can be subpoenaed again and, if he doesnât comply, can be charged all over again, ad infinitum.
At some point the dude needs to obey the law.
So you donât agree with Dershowitz? Who argues that Bannon had a defense (executive privilege) and if the committee disagreed, they could have sued for a ruling.
You think it was the prudent thing to do to criminally prosecute before asking the courts to test that legal defense?
Trump waived executive privilege in Bannonâs case.
You continue to ignore this point.
Your point is moot. Thereâs a legal question if Trump (or any president) is even required to âexertâ the privilege for it to be binding/valid as an excuse/reason to give congress.
Thatâs what you donât seem to understand.
Or just testify and tell the truth from the get. It should help trump, so why not do it? Save us a bunch of tax money too.
Complete dick riding faggot
The point isnât moot. He waived it. If my point was moot that judge would have accepted the argument.
All Bannon had to do (if he didnt want to talk) was show up and plead the 5th. He didnât even do that.
Have you considered that Bannon is doing this all for the theatre? No. Couldnât be that.
1 Like
Of course not. Dershowitz is a douchebag opportunist of the highest order.
The courts rejected the claim. Case close. Guilty
While youâre dick ridingâŚcanât make this shit up. Youâre a sidecar waiting to polish the balls of any right winger whoâs in your vicinity. What a pathetic excuse for a man