Lol
He said “Team America”…Now all of a sudden he’s patriotic. You’re embarrassing yourself. But hey at least your’re being cordial this time around.
How do think we can say any of this with confidence at all.
And Biden’s position looks pretty definitive to me.
BLM’s an enemy of the US…If you don’t support them, you certainly support the people who are supporting them, and denounce those who call out their bullshit.
You mean imagine if Russia treated Mexico better and afforded them more opportunity than we do?
Yeah, I’d be pretty pissed at my government if that was the case. And it would be hard to blame Mexico for looking out for their own interests.
If you had a point somewhere, I can’t find it. I certainly wouldn’t advocate INVADING MEXICO because their new president wants to make deals with Russia.
Warden, you do you, but my unsolicited advice is to not bother responding to Storm. He’s a dumb idiot. He just posted that NATO has been arming Ukraine since 2014 like it was A SURPRISE, like it is SOME BIG SECRET.
The truth is, Ukraine has been doing COIN ops with NATO for 20 years, we’ve restructured their entire military. Hell, Trump bragged about sending them missiles instead of blankets. Storm is a geopolitical idiot to try to use this fact as a surprise dunk.
So respond to skeeter, and Silent, and Garden if you’re in the mood for a debate. But Storm’s not worth anyone’s time.
1 Like
Because the United States offered to airlift President Zelensky to safety when the war started, and he said no, and he stayed in Kyiv.
That makes me pretty confident.
Highly doubt that happened. But to each their own.
Classic 305.
If Russia created SARTO (the South American-Russian Treaty Organization) and then began to systematically recruit South American, Central American and Caribbean nations up until the point of reaching Mexico…. And then began to put missile systems, nukes, and carriers in the Gulf of Mexico…. And then began to fund and arm Mexicans and train them for potential war with the United States due to the global and regional aggression that the United States exerts on free nations (some kind of policy like that)…
You’d be cool with that right?
I get it. If you’re a red blooded American you need to believe that Russians are human forms of Satan. But let’s stop pretending as though much of Russia’s response and posture isn’t due to the objective fact that they have a mutitrillion dollar American military and tens of industrialized nations on their borders with guns drawn and have crept closer and closer after promising not to do so.
Continue to be blind and biased. Don’t ask me to do it.
We’ve never taken over their sovereignty and held their people hostage for 70 years, like Russia did. So, it’s not a topical correlation. Would you like to try again, GSC?
Ukraine wouldn’t defend their sovereignty without the US approval? I think that’s a bit naive. They might not be as adept without US and NATO intervention and military infrastructure for sure.
Again, this is the 8th incursion into sovereign territory by Russia since Putin took over. They have been very vocal about their need to secure the 9 passages and secure what they consider to be their lasting safety. We all thought after seeing the 41 mile long Russian convoy at the beginning of the war to be the end for Ukraine.
BUT…Russia got just outside of Kiev and realized they didn’t have fuel. Two days later, they realized they didn’t have food.
They began to literally leave their vehicles and walk back. At this point, the world realized there was an opportunity and also, that Russia was overwhelmingly and totally inept from a military standpoint. This was even a bit more terrifying that if they weren’t. As we’ve discussed and Russia has admitted, they’re not stopping at Ukraine. They have 9 security passes they MUST control for their perceived safety. A mild study in history shows each one to be a required key. Ukraine is super important, but so is Poland and so is Azerbaijan and several others.
If Russia gets through Ukraine, we have NATO intervention as they’re in NATO countries. If Russia is militarily inept, and isn’t backing off, that means only 1 thing…if they get passed Ukraine, NATO has to fight and Russia would get annihilated and thus have to resort to nuclear weapons. That instance made NATO countries realized they are all invested in it and all have to stop them in Ukraine or we’re fighting and they can’t come anywhere in the vicinity of close without nukes.
Biden’s position is definitive. So is Germany’s and Poland’s and the rest of them. Ukraine is make or break for both sides AND Ukraine.
We all know Covid and BLM are your boogeymen. To debate whether or not black people who support BLM are enemies to the US, again, sounds like your personal problem and you can debate it with yourself.
Wasn’t it you who raised the alarm last year about Russia making deals in South America? It does happen, you know.
The thing you’re failing to realize is that this is a soft power game. It’s in the US’s interests to exert soft power on its neighbors, the be friendly with its neighbors, to offer its neighbors benefits of being allied with it and NOT Russia.
What you’re refusing to admit is that Ukraine siding with the US is an INDICTMENT of Russia. It’s a Russian failure just as much as it is a US win.
So yeah, Russia failed to keep Ukraine friendly, and now their only options are to let them walk away or to invade them. That’s all this is about, not imagined agreements with a state that hasn’t existed for 30 years.
And WE (except partisan sheep like you) all know these (and by the covid part I mean absurd covid mitigation and using covid to usher in globalists agendas) things are leftist tools (for lack of better word ).
You yourself said BLM was full of shit. So it sounds like a personal problem, an area of conflict for you.
You yourself admit to inflation being a problem. So ya ridiculously useless covid mitigation is definitely a problem then…You seem to be agreeing with me but telling me they are my personal problem? My point is a lot of this could have been avoided but instead it was used as a political and “great reset” weapon.
BLM has leaders admitted themselves they are marxists…BLM makes it a point to clearly state their support of communist regimes in other parts of the world. It’s no my interpretation of them, it’s pretty clear.
HILARIOUS REASONING……
WHY WOULD THE US OFFER THAT IF THEY WERE WINNING JUNIOR COSTANZA STUGOTZ?
LETS IGNORE BIDEN ASKED PUTIN FOR PERMISSION TO VISIT AND PUTIN WAS JUST WALKING THE UKRAINE STREETS BECAUSE PRESIDENT VISIT WAR SITES THEY ARE NOT WINNING……
HEAD SHANKER CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT OUR GREAT GOVERNMENT IS DOING HERE?
This mf’r has never heard of the Mexican cession.
Warden- go back to your habit of disappearing for a couple of hours to research the blogs to come back with content. You’re rusty.
This proves only that I’m consistent. Lol.
It’s one thing to economically aid a country it’s another thing co-opt countries to agree to point missiles at Russia’s border.
NATO has millions of soldiers on the front steps to Moscow. How should Russia feel about that? You think that this policy will get them to deescalate?
Detente. Detente is the only strategy that’s ever worked to deescalate tensions.
IF YOU UNDERSTAND ENGLISH HE TELLS YOU THE OPERATION IS TAKING THEM DOWN……
TICKEY FCKEN TOCKEY……
THE OBAMA MAFIA TREASON TRIALS ARE COMING….
NATO didn’t give a shit about Russia before they invaded Crimea. There was no military threat to Russia. No one was invading Russia. This is specious reasoning that is only meant for domestic Russian propaganda. No sensible person in the West believes this.
NATO was formed to be a bulwark against Soviet expansion and aggression. Full stop.
And instead, it has been NATO and the west that have been aggressive and expansionist.
Go look at a map from the formation of NATO in the 1940’s to today. NATO has crept closer and closer to the border of Moscow and with that expansion, has armed every conceivable neighbor of Russia on its Western front.
So again, I ask, if the Russians were strategically moving north through central and South America forming alliances with the singular goal of containing American aggression and expansion…. And this ultimately manifested in missile blocks in Cuba, Dominican Republic, Mexico, and all of Central America. And additionally, if all of these nations pledged a certain amount of soldiers and GDP to form a standing military and they ran exercises in the Gulf and in the Pacific a few miles from Miami and San Diego…
How would you feel about that?
Would Washington DC be justified in using force? Would they be justified in any kind of military action to repel these potential invaders?
2 Likes