Prove your claim that the arrests are just.
And I did provide context. Zero response from you on the woman arrested outside her home right after making an anti-invasion post on social media.
Actually, YOU made a claim on this subject FIRST.
Nobody mentioned the protests until you did:
So you made the claim that Putin is allowing free dissent in the street without police action. Besides the lack of police action being categorically incorrect, the burden is first on you to prove your statement.
Prove your claim!!!
GSC: “The moon is made of cheese.”
Everyone: “Uh, no it’s not.”
GSC: “Prove your claim!!!”
Everyone: “That’s not how this works?”
1 Like
Lmao-
This is just a silly statement. Prove that the arrests ARE legal? Anyone with half a brain would assume that the police ARE acting within their respective laws. There’s nothing I see that contradicts that.
Why would I have to prove the default position?
It’s up to those who say “it’s unjust” or “illegal” to show how.
GSC - this isn’t hard. Yet somehow you’re supporting the Russian police.
I mean, you straight up said “no police action” and you want to say MY statement is silly??? Think about it.
Lol…This fucking cunt
Any comment or legit question is classified as “support”
You are so such an argumentative, bratty little bitch
Was said 4 days ago. Shit happens. Again- can someone prove that the arrests are unjust? Why does that make me a Putin supporter?
I literally just posted support to my argument.
You don’t do research so I’m sure you didn’t read it.
You suck at being a closet hard right GOPer.
We’ve provided proof over and over.
You made the claim. Prove to us what they are legit.
I’m still entirely confused by your support of Putin here.
Your article proved that they are! It explained how restricted free assembly is in Russia. The fact that Putin or local law enforcement only grabbed the number he/they did proves my point.
Defends, trump, Putin, & Russia till the grave. Smh
The article - if you read it - shows that freedom of speech/protest has slowly been eroded away over the years.
We get it. You support suppression of protest in a country ran by a war criminal.
1 Like
Just or unjust doesn’t fucking matter because that is determined by Russia/Putin. Thus, all arrests are Just in their world. Now if you want to apply US law to their cases, they likely were unjust.
No need to keep going in circles.
Lol…And you’re saving them from us all. We get it
Yes, after 2 days of police action. Hence why it was a silly thing to say.
Also, the guy who “always admits mistakes” has still not backed down from that obvious mistake.
I agree.
How many total protesters have their been? Hundreds of thousands if not millions. We’re talking a miniscule amount of arrests.
By Putin’s perception in the west, this isn’t bad. That’s always been my point.
It’s not like he’s sending troops in the streets to quell dissent. He’s allowed a vast, overwhelming majority of Russian citizens to emote.
According to whom?
You’ll never forsake an opportunity to praise your dictators.
You’ve seen troops in the street quelling the protests?
I know there’s been some arrests. But if Putin wanted to crack down he would have already it seems.
I made no declarative statement - YOU DID.
So, prove your case. You made the statement, clear as day, that Putin was allowing a vast,overwhelming majority of Russian citizens to emote."
So…go ahead.