One candidate espouses ending innocent life and the other doesn’t. Harris supports an intrinsically evil thing. I can’t get behind that. I’m consistent there.
Trump accused of rape, the guy he picked from
Fox News accused of rape, the AG accused of rape. He was friends with Epstein. These guys are all pos but hey gsc is ok with it. The next two years will be fun to watch this train wreck. In two years Dems will retake the house and senate and trump will get impeached again. I would not be surprised if those close to him start to turn on trump. It’s human nature that when the shit hits the fan all the rats jump off the ship.
Hiring Dr Oz today. This is a clown car. The head of project 2025 hired. It’s amazing that people fall into this con.
1 Like
Innocent life!!! lol - 
you are ok for those kids to be born but won’t put your hands in your pocket to help support those kids? The odds are that the kid whose born and has no parents guiding him/her is more likely to commit crimes then the undocumented immigrants.
Just admit you don’t give two shits about the kid and you’re against abortion. Stop acting like some righteous person trying to save a life.
Lol….Meanwhile he was the righteous one and we were all barbarians during covid, right? Can’t make this shit up
So much fun as the meltdown continues.
Also…Thanks for the material for the cunty rant thread, was beginning to worry about you.
The Gaetz investigation report by the House has been leaked to the press. Presently, there are in the neighborhood of 51 experts who attribute the leaking to Russian collusion with the Democrat Party.
Indiana - honest question - after seeing skeeter post tell me you are against abortion. His mother tried to abort him and look how better of we would be without that pos on this planet.
I’m not righteous, but we don’t need to go over the abortion debate anymore.
You can be against abortion and support those kids that are born. I do both. No bragging at all. Just pointing out that you are wrong here. But it shouldn’t make you that upset.
I heard it was Tulsi Gabbard.
So you take care of those kids who are born. You actually are going to pay for their schooling? You are going to help feed them? You are actually going to put clothes on them? If they have medical issues you’re going to actually pay for it?
I’m not playing this game. We’ve been down this road.
My response was based upon your defense of Gaetz. We’ve discussed that at this point.
True. I agree entirely, however again…they’re not declaring war on you or me or the country.
Again, this is where we fundamentally disagree. I prefer to defend actual living children rather than the ones that don’t exist yet. I think those raping living children are worse than someone who defends abortion, particularly in lieu of a mother’s health. It’s weird some attack those who agree with the right to an abortion are the sames ones defending child rapists on a pretty routine basis or vote for or celebrate the myriad of policies that do things like kidnapping children from their parents with no plan whatsoever for reuniting them, promote taking free lunches away from lower income children, etc.
If you’re going to be for “the children” at what point do you get to the actual living children part? Being pro life isn’t the same as being pro birth.
Never been honest a day in your life
It’s curious you think of Harris as intrinsically evil because she believes in the woman’s right to an abortion, yet you praise your church.
You church put 20,000 children in mental asylums, taken from orphanages, because Canada paid more for mental patients than for orphans. That’s not intrinsically evil? They stole 150,000 British children and sent them to Australia to do hard labor. In the 1930s, they helped fascist Franco steal children of dissenters and sold then in illegal adoptions. Catholic nurse would literally take the newborn babies from the mother’s arms and tell them they had to do a checkup then return with a dead baby and tell the mother “oops, they’re dead now.” Then, they sold them. Isn’t that intrinsically evil? During WWII, the Catholic Church put thousands of Jewish children into Catholic schools to “protect them.” But, when the war was over they refused to return the children. That’s not evil? What about the gold in helping the Nazis escape? What about helping the Nazis escape in general? What about the deal with fascist Mussolini to create the Vatican itself? What about the 800,000 people killed in concentration camps by Catholics during the Croation disaster? What about the literal hundreds of years of child rape being protected by the Church itself?
You have a weird concept of what’s evil and what’s not.
You are twisting my words. I said that abortion is intrinsically evil. Someone who pushes for that is someone I can’t vote for.
I am pro life from birth to death, including at the end of life. Rape, murder etc are all intrinsically evil.
I don’t know any candidates pushing laws to further those things.
Separating children from families, something Obama did, is a media talking point on the issue of dealing with illegal immigration.
No, illegal immigration isn’t war, but those people are breaking our laws and laws have consequences.
Ah gotcha. I misread that.
That’s a false statement. There was no widespread Obama era policy of separating children from families. It’s GOP talking point, but it’s false. There were random times when they you can find it occurring, like one every six months to a year, but that was regarding a trafficking allegation.
Trump stole 2000 children with no intent to return them. They openly said it was to deter people from coming over.
Um…you elected a guy with 34 felonies, 91 indictments and a rape liability charge who said he was going to pardon people who violently attacked over 100 police officers. Do you want to rephrase that?
The Church is full of individuals, many of whom have failed greatly. Some evil people and leadership thoughout history.
The Catholic Church is also one of the greatest forces of good in the world with the building of hospitals and charity for the poor and marginalized across the world. What single organization has done more for the poor in human history? I don’t know of any single one.
Regardless, evil people exist in all walks of life. If you were to remove yourself from every organization that had people who sin or fail, you wouldn’t be in any group or organization.
If an organization consistently does evil things, how are they not evil?
You mean those same hospitals who stole children and told mothers their babies were dead, and moved misdiagnosed orphans as mentally challenged so they could get more money per orphan? It’s weird you have a belief that Harris believes in abortion and that’s evil so you can’t support her, but your Church has done some of the most evil things history has ever seen yet you hold nobody accountable for it in any way, and apologize for it.
Some sin and fail is one thing. Over 1000 years of the worst thing anyone has ever conceived is another.
However, in response, I’m not a part of any group or organization.
Ah, my mistake - I compete for Alliance Jujitsu. So, I guess one.
How am I supposed to hold someone accountable for something that happened 20 years or 1,000 years ago?
What does hold them accountable for it even mean?
20 years ago isn’t really that long ago, man.
Not being a member of the church I’d think would be a place to start.
But, I realize that’s typically an unreasonable response for the religious. It’s not an indictment. I realize that’s just how it is. I typically think the most religious are the most corrupt and immoral, a personal narrative, I suppose. There are lots of examples of some of the worst shit imaginable…it’s always been confusing to me how they’re just ignored by the membership bodies of churches.
You have to admit, that church has done some serious, seriously bad stuff.
But, it seems most churches do.