Love how you interpret the law to try and protect trump.
So GSC being here illegally according to you is so bad that you send a man to one of the worst jails in the entire world. You believe the man should be tortured for being here illegally because you committed zero violent crimes.
Lol meanwhile you changed the topic and didn’t refute what he said at all…Nice try though, spazz.
How ever are we going to survive this evil dictatorship??
There exists nobody less of a man than Skeeter.
Your wife called you a lifelong, self proclaimed, noble non- racist…A RACIST… and you said thank you and begged for more. Do you at least get to choose which day you get to wear the leopard print panties or does she call all the shots there too you spineless little cucky?
I’d advise you to read Trump vs JGG ruling and understand how it relates to your position.
Here you go- I did the hard work for you.
The case Trump v. J.G.G. centers on the Trump administration’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) of 1798 to expedite the deportation of certain Venezuelan nationals. This action was legally contested, leading to significant judicial proceedings. 
Background
On March 15, 2025, five Venezuelan nationals detained in U.S. immigration custody filed a class-action lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump and federal agencies, challenging their imminent removal under a presidential proclamation invoking the AEA. The plaintiffs argued that the AEA, a wartime statute, was being unlawfully applied during peacetime to bypass established immigration procedures and due process protections.  
Legal Arguments
• Plaintiffs’ Claims: The lawsuit contended that the AEA’s application in this context violated immigration statutes and constitutional due process rights. They asserted that the AEA was not intended for peacetime use and that its invocation circumvented the “sole and exclusive procedure” established by immigration law for determining removability. 
• Government’s Position: The Trump administration maintained that the AEA provided the authority to summarily remove individuals deemed threats to national security, arguing that the proclamation was a lawful exercise of executive power.
Judicial Proceedings
• District Court: The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a temporary restraining order blocking the removals, citing concerns over due process violations. Despite this, the government proceeded with the deportations without allowing the plaintiffs to contact their attorneys or receive a hearing.  
• Supreme Court: On April 7, 2025, the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, vacated the district court’s order, effectively allowing the deportations to proceed. The majority did not provide a detailed opinion, while Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson dissented. 
Implications
The Supreme Court’s decision has sparked debate over the limits of executive power and the protection of due process rights for non-citizens. Critics argue that the ruling sets a concerning precedent for the use of wartime statutes in peacetime immigration enforcement, potentially undermining established legal safeguards.
The guy is a crook who illegally entered the country. He is a known, positively identified member of a terrorist gang. He’s also a wife beater and has a list of outstanding warrants. He should never be allowed to return to the United States, and IMO his present venue is where he belongs.
Summarily used a wartime procedure during peacetime in order to bypass the Constitution. This is a clear abuse of power. I’m very shocked that the SC went 5-4 on this. Dangerous precedent has now been set.
So now you don’t like our system? The SCOTUS ruled.
If Congress wants to they can pass a bill and try to change the law BUT I would argue that that stubborn little Article II is way too strong for Congress to really do anything about it.
Only a stupid nation would mess with national security privileges of their executive. Could come back to bite them bad.
Don’t you dare put words in my mouth. I clearly stated that I was shocked by the decision. Nothing more nothing less. If that is the ruling, so be it. 2 things can be true at the same time.
Trump Administration getting frustrated with ukraine war. These idiots told everyone that day one the war would end. Do they realize russia is not ending it unless all of ukraine is back in their power. Rubio said that it needs to end in days. These guys just dont get it. Putin is the one that does not want it to end. No biggie as long as boys dont play girl sports this is another non issue according to skeeter. No boys in girl sports…another school shooting - thoughts and prayers everyone.
Cane, it does not matter to these animals. They don’t believe in rule of law. They have their KING (Donald Trump) and honestly they want him there in the office forever. They are going to try and make it happen.
Trump just admitted on camera that he wasn’t involved in the deportation. Of course I don’t believe that, because that’s what he does. He always distances himself from something or even someone that makes him look bad. Then he has the nerve to say in this clip that he’ll have to go before a judge. That’s literally what we’ve been saying the entire time: DUE PROCESS!!! This is what his supporters voted for!