She “escaped?” Like they had her imprisoned?
Come on with this propaganda nonsense bro.
How many are trapped by “democratic socialism” and need to “escape?”
Ask Storm. He’s trapped.
The Q followers are trapped in this rabbit hole. They crave more “crumbs” to “decode.” They’re obsessed.
The ones who were smart finally got out after Biden was sworn in.
Somehow, others - like Storm - still believe Trump will return as president for this term.
It’s lunacy.
That’s not remotely an equivalency.
QAnon believes prominent Democrats fuck kids in basements
And eat them.
Let me ask you a question Fire. I’m begging you to be honest with me.
1.2 million kids are trafficked and used for sex each year. ONE POINT TWO MILLION PER YEAR.
Who in your opinion are the consumers of these children?
That reads like an Onion article at points.
It is a BS fluff piece, but at the same time it’s probably mostly true.
A key tenet of QAnon is that there is a master plan at work and Trump is in charge. “The plan” said he would round-up the so-called deep state and bring them to justice. “The plan” said he would win the 2020 election in a landslide. When this didn’t happen, QAnon supporters began spinning absurd predictions that Trump would somehow halt Biden’s inauguration in the days or hours leading up to it.
None of that happened. But like in many cults, the lore and predictions in QAnon are ever-changing. Each time a prophecy fails to come to fruition, a new theory crops up to fill the void.
QAnon is scrambling right now trying to hold onto adherents. And there are plenty of people like Storm who are unable to admit they were wrong. But lots and lots of people have fled the coop.
I don’t doubt this number. It’s awful.
Now if you can prove to me that there’s a cabal of satan worshiping Dems and Hollywood elites who do this - and eat them, and that Trump is the savior that will bring all of this to life, then we can have a conversation.
Until then, you’re acting like a Q believer who doesn’t want to admit it.
Forget about the satan part. I mean - to purchase a child for sex sort of implies that prima facia but let’s leave it aside and look at the economics.
A child goes between $5000 - $50000 on the market (probably some that are more).
Who has this kind of money to spend on having sex with children?
Certainly not average Joe’s like you and me right 51?
So who? You know the answer. There are only so many of them in this market.
Epstein had a book full of their names.
Why is this so hard to understand that the people in power (big business - show business - politics) are the ones buying these kids?
Wait - why? This is Q yes? You don’t get to leave out part of this conspiracy because it doesn’t fit the argument you’re trying to make.
As for the rest of your argument - another very simple example.
Someone starts online chatter accusing you of this shit. No proof. Just random meaningless “crumbs” that people contort into believing you do this shit.
How would you feel? How would you respond? You’d demand proof, yes?
I’m waiting.
Because it’s not germane to the point I’m making. I’m simply asking “who is the most likely market for trafficked children?”
I don’t care about their religion.
Have you ever watched MouthyBuddha? Does a good job going through the evidence on the Podesta brothers and other alleged conspirators.
Have you ever asked yourself why the media simply calls these stories far fetched and mocks people who pursues them instead of pursuing it themselves?
Why don’t they actually look into it and debunk it? Because they are not allowed to buddy!
You didn’t answer my question. As always. What would you do if you were accused of something like this without any proof?
I’ve been wrongly accused of stealing before - with no proof - and I was fucking angry. As you would be too.
No. Just no. No one is saying the atrocity of child trafficking doesn’t happen. Hell it’s awful in FL.
As for your question:
who is the most likely market for trafficked children?”
What does this even mean? The most likely market? How would you answer this?
I know how I would answer: fucking sick lunatics who should never again see the light of day. How would you answer? That a specific political party goes after them? Are you insane? Or are you a Q supporter? You’re sounding like one. Honestly, there may not be a difference.
I’m asking for proof that there’s a cabal of Dems and Hollywood elites who are doing this. And eating them. Prove it.
Why is this so hard? The reason why it’s so hard is that you have no proof. There is none.
The truth is that child trafficking isn’t about political party. I don’t give a fuck what these people believe politically. The only thing they should have is 3 squares a day and 23 hours a day in an 8x10 cell the rest of their lives.
I would hope you agree with me on this.
I’m not entirely sure what me answering this question proves. You’re not even giving me some basic info like - is there some information that would lead these people to believe I did this thing?
I think it’s pretty simple.
There’s a Gucci bag market. That demographic is rich women.
We can extrapolate using the price of the item. $5000-$50000
The market is the rich powerful and famous.
Go look at Congress’s net worth. You’d be shocked.
Every time I watch interviews of rich powerful people I always wait for a small child to run out of the door behind them 
This isn’t brain science buddy. There’s only so many people on earth with enough money, security, and connections to afford and get away with these sorts of “purchases.”
It’s not Frankie down the street.
GSC you are good at one thing: avoiding answering basic questions.
Let’s say someone lost their wallet at a grocery store. They know they were around you - an employee of the store at one point because they paid for something there.
Is that enough for you? I’m sure you’ll find some other way to avoid this question.
So…Mitch McConnell is loaded. He must be in on this too right? Rand Paul? Donald Trump?
You’re trying to say, without saying it, that because leaders of the Democratic Party have money (nevermind the right), they engage in this crap.
That’s a curious opinion - especially without proof.
You’ve convinced me that you’re all in on Q and are too embarrassed to admit it.
McConnell I would say probably.
Rand Paul… don’t know. Don’t think he’s that rich.
Trump? I mean - he pushed them harder than anyone in history. I don’t think so but who knows?
I don’t stop at party. I’m sure prominent republicans do it. I’m sure libertarians and others do as well. The main denominator here is power and access.
The way I understand it is, in order to be allowed into the establishment, there must be dirt on you. That’s the only way they can trust you to be compliant. To follow the rules.
And partaking in trafficking and specializing minors is the way in.
Makes complete sense to me. You don’t have to believe it. Doesn’t bother me.
Nope- not even a little bit.
In fact, I’m of the opinion that there really isn’t a Formalized Qanon theory.
Most people that I read in my group that follow Q are sort of piecing it together and get into debates about what things mean.
GSC I don’t care who it is. Rich, poor, Republican or Democrat, into politics or not.
If you believe that anyone is a Satan worshiping child sex trafficking pedophile and cannibal, you better have good proof.
Being accused of even one of these things is awful.
Well, I’m no “brain scientist” but do Republicans earn less than Democrats?
Then why is raping kids in a basement put solely on Dems?