New York Times lol
Sorry…If it ain’t wordle, no chance
Brought to you by the publication that got Russiagate completely wrong!
Ladies and gentlemen, two people who constantly say you should criticize the story, not the source.
UNTIL THE SOURCE IS A PROVEN LIAR OVER AND OVER AGAIN?
YOU “TEAM” DISMISSES SOURCE BASED ON NOT LIKING THE STORY……
IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE SO NAME THE SOURCES OTHERS ARE SOURCING THAT ARE PROVEN LIARS OVER AND OVER AGAIN?
A. Please give an example
B. Imagine defending the New York Times
Huh? They got the entire story and every aspect of it wrong. That’s a comment of their coverage. It’s not as hominem. What you talking about? What a reach.
Actually, it’s the definition of it.
No- if they were a random publisher and I was commenting on the totality of their work… sure.
But this is extremely specific. They wrote extensively on this and got everything wrong. They either lied or misled people.
WHY IS THE SAME MSM CENSORING SPEECH?
SINCE WHEN DID WE BECOME COMMUNIST?
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT?
THESE ARE THE CRIMINALS YOU SAY WE SHOULD LISTEN TO……
YOU WOULD THINK SINCE YOU JUNIOR COSTANZA STUGOTZ ARE A “MODERATE” THIS WOULD TROUBLE YOU NO?
Do tell…what in particular?
The NYTimes:
The media at large:
You are remarkably lazy, huh?
Again, what in particular did they allege and how was that wrong?
Also, citing Glenn Greenwald doesn’t help your case, despite you shared love of Russia and enemies of the US
And yet you still haven’t been “extremely specific” about debunking the article. As expected.
I haven’t read the article. I haven’t read many political articles the past year. Not really interested.