Serious question warden. And I hope we can keep the digs and personal insults to a minimum here.
At what point do you finally realize that they are just throwing shit against the wall with Trump?
The man has been under public scrutiny for 4 decades. They have went at him with every resource in the federal government now for 7 years…. They’ve found nothing.
But this is the one?
Yup…THIS is the golden ticket. Warden’s found it!
Phewwww…
That’s entirely false.
In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Trump.
In June 2016, USA Today published an analysis of litigation involving Donald Trump, which found that over the previous three decades Trump and his businesses have been involved in 3,500 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, an unprecedented number for a U.S. presidential candidate.[1] Of the 3,500 suits, Trump or one of his companies were plaintiffs in 1,900; defendants in 1,450; and bankruptcy, third party, or other in 150.[1] Trump was named in at least 169 suits in federal court.[2] Over 150 other cases were in the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida (covering Broward County, Florida) since 1983.[3] In the 1,300 cases where the record establishes the outcome, Trump settled 175 times, lost 38, won 450, and had another 137 cases end with some other outcome. In the other 500 cases, judges dismissed plaintiffs’ claims against Trump.[1]
Of Trump’s involvement in the lawsuits, his lawyer Alan Garten said in 2015 that this was “a natural part of doing business in [the United States]”,[4][5] and in the real estate industry, litigation to enforce contracts and resolve business disputes is indeed common.[4] Trump has, however, been involved in far more litigation than fellow real-estate magnates; the USA Today analysis in 2016 found that Trump had been involved in legal disputes more than Edward J. DeBartolo Jr., Donald Bren, Stephen M. Ross, Sam Zell, and Larry Silverstein combined.[1]
The Trump lawsuits[4][5] have attracted criticism from Trump’s opponents, who say that this is not a trait that conservatives should support.[4] James Copland, director of legal policy at the conservative-leaning Manhattan Institute, states that “Trump clearly has an affinity for filing lawsuits, partly because he owns a lot of businesses” and has sometimes used litigation as a “bullying tactic”.[4]
Although Trump has said that he “never” settles legal claims, Trump and his businesses have settled with plaintiffs in at least 100 cases (mostly involving personal injury claims arising from injuries at Trump properties), with settlements ranging as high as hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars[1] and recently as high as tens of millions of dollars.[6]
Among the most well-known Trump legal cases was the Trump University litigation. Three legal actions were brought alleging fraud, one by the New York State attorney general and the others by class action plaintiffs.[7] In November 2016, Trump agreed to pay $25 million to settle the litigation.[6]
You’re lazy.
Also, you support a dictator who attempted a coup, showing you’re a sack of shit and a traitor to this country. Simple enough.
At what point are you even going to attempt having integrity or being objective? We know the answer…never, never in a million years.
Lol he said “coup” again
I thought Cassidy was the bombshell? The actress that was so courageous that was immediately refuted and anyone with a brain could see the gaping holes in her statements.
Or was it the southern district of New York?
When one bombshell fades away we’re ready for the next one.
This is it though. This is the one they are going to nail him on. They got it guys.
Oh, and Warden just went to Wikipedia to prove how Orange Man is bad. This guy is unhinged.
Huh? I’m not talking about civil litigation or torts.
The zero integrity crew is out today…easy list. You’re simply upset you support a career criminal and it shows what a dirtbag you are. Again, willful ignorance shows the lack of integrity as a man. Weak, weak person who can’t stand on his own feet, but instead is like a talking bobblehead. Said this time and time again, but advertising is built for you.
All of the person lawsuits are right there, so if they were “going after him for 4 decades”, it would be right there. If its not, you’re full of shit with your initial statement. A simple read through shows he’s been guilty several times…hell, he and his kids can’t work with a charity in NY because they literally stole from a children’s cancer charity. You guys just ignore shit like that, like Trump U and all the other frauds he’s been in. He’s rich and litigious. He wastes our court’s time, but you guys love that…because, you have no integrity or character.
There’s all kinds of shit throughout his life, him and his kids. They’ve been frauds forever, you just don’t have the integrity to care. The justice system, as we’ve seen clearly, favors rich people. Visits from donors at DA offices help, of course
It isn’t that you’re naive or confused…you simply don’t care. You’re not a person of character, of integrity. You’re a Christian dominionist who wants authoritarian government and is so narcissistic and self righteous, you’ll never be built strong enough to look inward in an honest manner.
Indiana, however, is simply the base. He doesn’t think too much, doesn’t think too deeply…if the GOP told him there was a “revolution in toilet paper”, he’s grab a stick and start staring at the bathroom. He’s a functional moron. How functional? Well, he lives in Indiana…doesn’t have to be too much.
My lord. I meant the media. They were absolutely looking into him and willing to report dirt. Never really happened.
You’re all over the place with your assumptions.
Yes, it was dumb of GSC to say “They’ve been going after him for 4 decades” and also say he’s “not talking about litigation and torts” but instead “the media.”
Because the media’s been going after Trump for decades BECAUSE of the litigation and torts.
As Warden would say, that’s a dishonest deflection. GSC spinning semantics and qualifiers like, “I was talking about LAND wars!!!”
That said, Dems have been citing criminal concerns with Trump’s presidency since before he was elected, so GSC’s question is a good one, Warden.
Do you really think Trump is going to see jail time? And this is the one thing that’s finally going to do it?
The context was always criminal. Pretty obvious.
Teflon
We have seen a crime boss like this since the 40s