Well- if there is anything to dig deep on a side for its speaking up for and protecting the defenseless. One side is morally justified, the other condemned.
Absolutely
Lol
Bring out the coat hangers, yâall!!!
Iâll take my drink, neat, in hell please!
The Supreme Court ruling does not forbid abortions. It corrects a terrible decision that created law from the bench rather than the legislature. Judge Alito did a splendid job. He cleaned up the Constitution.
No way will women be stopped from having abortions. In my opinion, it is the womanâs decision that should be the controlling decision.
I donât like the idea of destroying a fetus, especially in late abortions, but women are not equal if the law can dictate how they govern their own bodies. Equality should trump religious moralityâŚ
Reverence for life is something that is more particular to humans than all other species, many of which we do away with with impunity because we regard them as food. You could make a good case that morality is shredded by manâs consuming other creatures. And, it is broken as well by other creatures that must kill to survive.
I believe that controlling a population will eventually become a world imperative. Perhaps the Malthusian Theorem will be re-examined as population versus resources puts greater pressure on the burgeoning number of humans. Humans have few predators aside from other humans, so environmentalism eventually must be spread to controlling population. As I have written some years ago, I see the future of mankind with humanity transferred from carbon creatures into silicon creatures. I wonder how that will affect race, sex, and sexuality. We will become robots.
The Lol should be eschewed, Dj.
Youâll remember this day when the lots are drawn. And remember, I didnât mention hell, you did. Itâs on your mind and youâre too stubborn to do anything about it.
Meanwhile Louisiana working on calling it homicide.
Donât be naive
No? Did you mean something else by âcondemnedâ then?