Is anything this man said wrong? Factually incorrect?
Seriously asking. If not people need to go to jail.
I have read multiple places of both the
- Remedesivir (sp) part
- Death certificate part
I have read stories and heard from a friend that doctors have helping a family out they think may have needed out by classifying a death as covid. Nice gesture…But in the meantime killing the country.
I cannot verify, and have only heard those two aspects in an anecdotal manner.
GSC is more idiotic than SF ever was. Why would someone be so obsessed with not being wrong?
I really hope no one is clicking on these intellectually void tic tocs.
Another “attack the vessel”
The video didn’t originate on tik tok…. It’s just where I found it. What difference does it make. Is the info true ?
Yeah, it’s false.
First, he is a dermatologist from Thousand Oaks, CA. Secondly, he’s a part of “America’s Frontline Doctors” which includes a “Dr” who claims sickness is caused by having sex in your dreams with demons, that alien DNA is being used in medical treatments, and that researchers are working on a vaccine to prevent people from becoming religious. Also, that there is a conspiracy by the Illuminati to destroy the world through abortion, gay marriage and of all things, children’s toys.
Patient Bill of Rights - partially true, definitely trying to be misleading
Patient Rights. CMS is waiving requirements under 42 CFR §482.13 only for hospitals that
are considered to be impacted by a widespread outbreak of COVID-19. Hospitals that are
located in a state which has widespread confirmed cases (i.e., 51 or more confirmed cases*)
as updated on the CDC website, CDC States Reporting Cases of COVID-19, at
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html, would not
be required to meet the following requirements:
• §482.13(d)(2) - With respect to timeframes in providing a copy of a medical record.
• §482.13(h) - Related to patient visitation, including the requirement to have written
policies and procedures on visitation of patients who are in COVID-19 isolation and
quarantine processes.
• §482.13(e)(1)(ii) - Regarding seclusion.
*The waiver flexibility is based on the number of confirmed cases as reported by CDC and
will be assessed accordingly when COVID-19 confirmed cases decrease.
Though, he relates the waiver of Patient’s Bill of Rights to payments, which it has nothing to do with. Also, as you can see, the only things being waived related to timing of the bill and visitation.
As far as the payments…false or what he is saying is false. Medicare patients get more as mentioned earlier
The posts’ claim that the payment increase applies “every time a hospital admits, discharges, or loses a patient to Covid-19” is false. The 20% weighted factor increase applies only to Medicare patients and those without health insurance. It does not apply to patients with other forms of health insurance, like Medicaid or private insurance.
You’re boring. I’ve fact checked this enough - I’m less than half way through and all of it has been bullshit to one extent or another.
Lol…Oh a “fact checker” I’m convinced.
The CDC guidance says that officials should report deaths in which the patient tested positive for COVID-19 — or, if a test isn’t available, “if the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty.” It further indicates that if a “definite diagnosis of COVID–19 cannot be made, but it is suspected or likely (e.g., the circumstances are compelling within a reasonable degree of certainty), it is acceptable to report COVID-19 on a death certificate as ‘probable’ or ‘presumed.’”
“If we think it’s presumptive … we can go ahead and put down COVID-19,” Jensen said, “or even in some situations, even if it’s negative.” He pointed to the example of a 38-year-old man in Minnesota whose death was attributed to the coronavirus even though he tested negative.
Lol^^^…No thanks
Yet, not a word about that subject matter the guy stated was true that was proven false.