“Adhere to a social contract when it satisfies my sanctimony and delusional, cunt-type fears”…
Fixed it for you…You absolute hypocrite, piece of shit. You can’t make this shit up. I don’t owe you and your fake ass social contract a fucking thing you fucking delusional cunt.
Fuck you, fuck your sanctimony and delusion, fuck your shore mother…All of it. You delusional fucking twats just refuse to leave people alone.
Leave me the fuck alone…And I’ll do likewise for you
You maniac partisan sheep like to talk about “contracts” and “unifiying” when it suits your narrative and appeases your delusional fear and sanctimony.
The social contract is a Rousseau-an idea. It relates to natural law and how we are all bound by a sense of duty to one another in a society (state to individuals) individuals give up sovereignty in exchange for protection from the state and protection of their rights).
It was foundational in constructing our constitution. E.g the bill of rights.
The problem with the term social contract, as used today, is that socialists want to transform it from protecting individual rights into social welfare transfers.
That’s never what the social contract was about. They’ve corrupted it to further their ends.
Actually it originates from antiquity. Even before Rousseau you have the likes of grotius (sp), Hobbes, and others who wrote about the social contract some 100 years earlier, but lets not let facts get in the way. Guess what? They all understood and explained it differently too.
It relates to natural law and how we are all bound by a sense of duty to one another in a society (state to individuals) individuals give up sovereignty in exchange for protection from the state and protection of their rights).
Generally agree, but there are many nuances.
The problem with the term social contract, as used today, is that socialists want to transform it from protecting individual rights into social welfare transfers.That’s never what the social contract was about. They’ve corrupted it to further their ends.
Let’s bring in some quotes from your boy Rousseau and see what he thinks…
In truth, laws are always useful to those with possessions and harmful to those who have nothing; from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all possess something and none has too much.
What man loses by the social contract is his natural liberty and an unlimited right to everything he tries to get and succeeds in getting; what he gains is civil liberty and the proprietorship of all he possesses.
You forget that the fruits belong to all and that the land belongs to no one.
Government originated in the attempt to find a form of association that defends and protects the person and property of each with the common force of all.
Everything we do not have at our birth and which we need when we are grown is given us by education
You are an idiot. He led the charge on socialism by attacking private property.
You are championing him as something he is not and using him against socialism, yet there is a lot of socialism intertwined, you are just too stupid to understand.