TICKEY FCKEN TOCKEY…
I hope we actually get bombshells out of this. The rich elites don’t often see justice.
Lol, I don’t understand the point of PC labels. Colorado just voted that new materials will not refer to these people as “sex offenders” but as “adults who commit sexual offenses.” You can’t make this up.
1 Like
That’s a lot of parties to be seen with the same person.
1 Like
WHO IS THE CHICK WITH TRUMP IN ALMOST EVERY PICTURE?
IS THAT MELANIA?
IS YOUR THEORY THAT THE CLINTON’S, BUSH’S, OBAMA’S PROTECTED HIM AND DESPITE TRUMP BEING INVOLVED HE TOOK DOWN EPSTEIN WHICH WOULD INCRIMINATE HIMSELF?
FAKE NEW PROPAGANDA REALLY EFFECTS THE BRAIN IN PROCESSING INFORMATION…
EITHER THAT OR YOU ARE JUST DUMB AS A ROCK LIKE ROCKO HEAD SHANKER…
WHERE IS ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE TYING TRUMP TO ANYTHING?
TAKE INTO ACCOUNT TRUMP IS 100% SOBER IN ALL THOSE PICTURES BECAUSE DOES ZERO SUBSTANCES…
ZERO…
SO THERE WOULD BE NO EXCUSES AND THEY GOT NOTHING ON HIM…
INSTEAD HE WILL GO DOWN AS PROBABLY THE GREATEST FIGURE TO HAVE WALKED ON THIS PLANET…
THAT IS HOW BIG ALL OF THIS IS…
TICKEY FCKEN TOCKEY THE TRIAL IS ABOUT TO STARTY…
WE WILL KNOW SHORTLY…
Watching you meltdown is hilarious
Lol, I love seeing GRANDMA’s cognitive dissonance as Trump wishes Ghislaine well and then he goes on a rant how Trump is the greatest person to have ever walked on the planet!!!
1 Like
Isn’t it public knowledge already that Trump was working with the FBI to get info on Epstein?
So very likely he’s a white hat in these photos. But let’s not let that narrative creep in.
Is it? I haven’t heard that. Do you have a link?
Thank you for repeating the statement and question about the statement, GRANDMA. Hopefully you’re all caught up now? For my part, there’s nothing wrong with asking a question, GRANDMA.
GSC, thanks for the links. None of them mention Trump working with the FBI, right?
The first article/blog is titled, “Trump Testified Against Epstein,” and it strangely does not discuss Trump testifying anywhere at all.
The other two are about, as far as I can tell, a civil suit against Epstein in 2008/2009? I’m not flush with details here so please correct me if I’m wrong, but a lawyer talked to Trump over the phone and said Trump was helpful in answering his questions, and that lawyer ended up getting payouts for his clients. Good on Trump for that.
What I was asking is, is it public knowledge that Trump was working with the FBI by schmoozing with Epstein to get them info? Because I wasn’t aware of that and would like to read about it.
1 Like
Lol - unfortunately 305, the FBI doesn’t publicly release who works for them.
It’s inferred. The Prosecutor working the Epstein case admits that Trump’s the only individual in Epstein’s sphere that willingly gave information about him.
If you want to dance around that fact to win an online semantics debate, have at it.
Most reasonable people will come to the conclusion that I have come to.
I don’t know what you’re laughing at. You could have saved yourself a lot of trouble by changing:
“Isn’t it public knowledge already that Trump was working with the FBI to get info on Epstein?”
to
“Isn’t it a complete fabrication on my part that Trump was working with the FBI to get info on Epstein?”
Then I wouldn’t have bothered to engage you about it.
How is it inferred? The prosecutor in question isn’t even a criminal attorney. He won a civil case against Epstein by representing abuse victims.
You’re leapfrogging off that to say Trump helped the FBI?!?
Can you please explain to me your “inferred” train of thought? Because it sounds more like a train wreck to me.
You sure about that?
I’m afraid, GSC, this is one of those hills you die on where it’s obvious to everyone that you misspoke and now you’re refusing to back down. A good clue this is happening is when you play the semantics card.
Civil Attorney does not equal Federal Bureau of Investigation.
305- you win.
Trump didn’t work directly with the FBI it would seem (this came out years ago so my memory was fuzzy).
He worked with an attorney to help sexual assault victims get justice.
There you have it. Same practical message develops.
Trump was against Epstein and tried to bring him to justice.
You win your semantic/technical debate. I win the substance.