People tie the current admin to the current conditions in the country by and large. It’s not rocket science. You are being purposefully obtuse to try and win an argument. Nitpicking the obvious point that has been made that people think inflation is bad right now and that probably hurts Biden more than Trump is kind of silly and makes you look petty.
When you lower taxes, you transfer money from the hands of government to citizens. Some of the money is used to create wealth. Some is used to buy consumer items and exchanges hands in the private sector again and again. Trump plans to make the government smaller, more streamlined, fewer regulations, more freedom for citizens to make decisions for themselves. Cut taxes, cut government.
Sure, some people do. And some people don’t. And some people go by feelings. And some people go by data. And most people, honestly, just vote for their party.
So now that we have all of that out of the way, I think it’s clear these statements have accomplished nothing.
Indy you really think sundaes are better than cones. Remember Sundays don’t even have a cone you have to use a spoon
American research survey August 21:
A total of 36% of Americans say that the national economy is getting better, 17% say it is staying the same, and 44% say the national economy is getting worse.
Why RFK abandoned the Democrat Party in support of Trump is delightfully described by James Howard Kunsler whose work I think is worthy of praise. What we’re seeing is a rebellion of those who are more or less “normal” against those who are for lack of a better word “crazed.” Read about RFK, Jr murdering a whale with a chainsaw.
So you believe in polls now?
Anyway, those numbers don’t dispute my point, which is that there’s large variation / divide over what Americans think.
I would call Republicans “weird” more than “crazed” but I guess your word works too.
. My point.
Your next 2 cases weren’t “evidentiary in nature. They were statutory.
And for the latter cases- “ruling on the merits” doesn’t mean they allowed evidence to be presented. It means they ruled on whatever facts were presented and how the law applied in their opinion. So you did a lot of research for very little gain. As usual.
Nice snarky comment when losing the argument.
Of course there is a divide when half the country is one party.
The point is that this is a top issue and it hurts Biden more than Trump.
I bet you also don’t know that while they deplatformed the story to fact check it, they never completed the fact check.
The folks that wrote the story to this day have been asking about that fact check and have gotten no response. Over three years.
Maybe someday you will wake up and realize the propaganda being fed by mainstream. It’s way beyond bias.
REALLY. Fox news has gone out of their way to protect TRUMP. This is what Trump and those that surround him want…POOR ME.
Indiana, TRUMP has basically gotten free Marketing and Advertising by the MEDIA since 2016. He can’t buy the attention that he gets DAILY. Every single Day Trump is in the NEWS. This is WHAT HE WANTS. The problem is YOU DON’T SEE THIS. The moment Trump is not mentioned in the media the guy loses his shit. He can’t stand that Kamala is getting all the attention now. It is amazing you don’t see through this BS.
Trump has CONNED YOU AND SO MANY OTHERS to think that the MEDIA is being tough on TRUMP. COME ON…He chose to run for office. He chooses to lie every day. He chooses to say something that he KNOWS is going to draw attention. How in the world you can’t see it. Man wake the f up and realize what this clown is doing.
Elite I’m not even talking about Trump or FOX. It’s way bigger than that and wouldn’t matter if someone else is in office.
FOX for sure plays the opposition and is a right leaning news network, but if you can’t see the mainstream media bias and outright politicking for the Democratic Party, you are just asleep.
They don’t even hide it anymore. Every story is framed from the beginning to push a narrative. It isn’t news, but straight propaganda.
In this case, it’s way worse because it is a federal agency contacting a free speech platform and pressuring them to suppress a story that would have had major ramifications if it was widely distributed. It was a true story that we know after the fact but it’s too late.
That’s dangerous stuff and I would think anyone, Dem or Republican alike can admit that that’s not the US we want to live in. Suppress free speech to get the big bad orange man.
I see it. MSNBC is horrible. It is way beyond biased. CNN is going to start leaning right . The owner is a right leaning thinker. Ironically Fox will probably become a liberal network as the kids behind Murdoch are all liberals.
News is entertainment. News was originally non-profit. Now it is big business.
1 Like
It was an honest question.
Are polls trustworthy and believable or not?
Should we cite polls in our arguments or not?
No snark. I want to know what is in bounds with you.
Which is what I’ve been saying if you pay attention.
I think you’re in the wrong thread, but Zuck said they cleared the story after a week. I don’t know what “completing a fact check” means, but Facebook was satisfied enough with the story that they didn’t feel the need to demote it anymore.
Zuckerberg told Rogan: “The background here is that the FBI came to us - some folks on our team - and was like 'hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert.”
He said the FBI did not warn Facebook about the Biden story in particular - only that Facebook thought it “fit that pattern”.
“For the five or seven days when it was basically being determined whether it was false, the distribution on Facebook was decreased, but people were still allowed to share it,” Zuckerberg added. “You could still share it, you could still consume it.”
You can keep harping on the boogeyman of “mainstream media” but this was on the Joe Rogan Experience.
It’s a real thing and people like you and every 65 year old Senior (my in laws included) suck it up as fact.
Elite just admitted it’s entertainment. They don’t even try anymore.
Wait for the edited Dana Bash interview to air. Her one objective will be to make sure Kamala comes out looking good.
Just open your eyes.
I do not suck up Joe Rogan as fact. And you’re the on who posted the Politico source.
The fact is:
YOU posted a source.
YOU then invented a headline that was not backed up by the source.
I explained how you were wrong.
Then YOU blamed it on the mainstream media.
Again, your entire post is based on Zuck’s words, and then when his words say the opposite of what you want, you say “His words don’t matter.”
That is NOT an honest way to debate.
That’s where you are wrong. My entire post is not based on his words or that article. I threw that article up for context. I would never cite an entire Politico article to argue a point. They are so far scewed against the right that it’s amazing they even covered the story, to be honest. There is so much more there that they didn’t dig into.
Says the guy who did exactly that.
Fine, I won’t harp on it, I’ll let you take back posting that article. Just keep in mind, next time you post an article, don’t be surprised if someone reads and responds to it!