Ofcourse they are!

1 Like

Lol, this is hilarious deflection.

Sources say the FBI agents and officials who were involved in the raid on former President Trump’s home work in the same Counterintelligence Division of the FBI

Oh noes! Not the same division!

If there’s a serious accusation here, let’s list names of agents being seriously investigated. It’s public record, right?

If this was such an urgent matter (it wasn’t) then why did the FBI wait several days until they descended on Trump’s home?

Yes, WHY DID THEY WAIT SEVERAL DAYS. That’s the whole conspiracy folks. Several days.

This entire “article” is a nothingburger.

What a joke of a “news” site.

The entire OMB movement is a nothing burger…Touche

Why did you it this 305?

and are actively under criminal investigation by Special Counsel John Durham for potentially abusing their power investigating Trump in the Russian fraud and therefore have a potential conflict of interest and should have been RECUSED from participating in this supposed “espionage” investigation at Mar-a-Lago” Sperry said in a social media post on Saturday.

Not sure what that is so I’m going to go with “okay.”

Omit, perhaps? I addressed it. I said, if there are really agents under investigation causing a conflict of interest, let’s see their names. This is public record, right? The GWP is a news site, right?

Why so vague about coworkers in the same division? If you have some deets, post them.

Instead you get a vague hand-wavy article that says nothing at all. Intelligent people should pick up on that.

OMB = Orange Man Bad

Wake up neutral guy

Duh, and you just gave them $ clicking on their idiot bait

Sorry if I don’t speak radical.

Nah I use ad blockers.

You still bumped their hit count up, which they use to sell ad space

I suppose it’s possible that they book ads that way, though we don’t know for sure. I assumed they would do do pay per clicks or impressions.

Of course it is. What are you talking about?

Not arguing against better monetization from clicking an ad, but you have to have a base to show value.

You could also spend time on Paul Sperry originally writing for WND, who lied so often they had to put it into their terms of service that they are not publishing facts, and then went on to write for the blatantly dishonest EpochTimes.

Did you just agree with me and then ask what I was talking about?

No, go back and reread.

I said something was possible, you agreed of course it’s possible, then asked what i was talking about.

No, you are uncertain. I am certain