I’ll bet my last dollar that the majority were vaccinated.
Most cases with youth in my town are trending that way.
Well past time we learn to live WITH covid…The media and the morons refuse to accept this and continue to inflict themselves upon the rest of us
1 Like
THAT IS THE REASON FOR THE PUSH TO VACCINATE…
THE TEST WILL SEPARATE THE FLU AND COVID NOW AND THE VACCINE WILL KEEP THE “SCAMDEMIC” ALIVE…
IF THERE ARE MANY UNVACCINATED YOU WILL NOTICE ITS THE VACCINATED…
https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1471635387550519298?s=10
https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1471636062271385611?s=10
https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1471637743453323268?s=10
https://twitter.com/claytravis/status/1471638579193552904?s=10
ALEX BERENSON WAS THE FIRST TO SAY THERE LOOK TO BE EVIDENCE IT WAS HAPPENING AND NOW IT IS…
YOU WONDER WHY TWITTER BANNED HIM…
My bet is that water is wet.
So far I received two Moderna shots. After the second one, I developed severe cardiac myopathy; I’ve never had heart problems in my life. My blood pressure was 240/120, and I thought my heart wanted to jump out of my chest like what happened in the movie Alien, My doctors pumped me full of vitamins and antibiotics, and my heart settled down.
Then, fully vaccinated, I got full blown Covid. It was like getting hit by a truck. Thankfully, the first thing I did was take Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine with zinc with Z pak. Then, I ran to Fort Walton Beach, Florida to get the monoclonal antibodies which really helped. Still taking an IV drip of vitamins, I have slept a lot but I’ve rounded the turn. My sense of smell has returned, and I no longer have any fever. I am feeling better with each passing day.
I think early treatment of Ivermectin is the way to go. When I was first diagnosed my blood oxygen level was 92, and I was starving for air. I took the Ivermectin and the next day, my blood oxygen shot up to 98. Covid kills patients by rendering blood cells incapable of taking up oxygen. By all means, don’t let them put you on a ventilator and give you Redemsivir. If you get a chance watch the You Tube video on Ivermectin in Japan.
It’s very likely if that vast majority of kids in school are vaxxed, no?
Sounds like you got the kitchen sink cocktail: vax + Ivermection + HCQ + zinc + antibodies. Glad you’re ok.
Great vaccine right? Last year barely any children cases this year ton of them all vexed
Vaccines are not the only variable. We’re also now dealing with delta and omicron, which do a better job of beating the vaccine. I don’t know anyone who denies this.
I literally don’t get you guys cheering any vaccine failure you see.
1 Like
They seem to be willing to cheer death, sacrifice those who need to be, sacrifice the Constitution, the concept of voting…all for a basic conman who’s lies are so overt its unreal, and who’s sole concern with himself over literally everyone on the planet and his country is on display with every sentence he utters. If that’s not a cult, I dunno what is
I’m more stuck on the logic part of it. Their position doesn’t even make sense.
Like Storm will post TOLD YOU SO if the Pfizer vaccine drops to 60% effectiveness after 6 months…
Is THAT what he told us? that the vaccine would help for a while and then lose some of its efficacy after time? That’s not a gotcha… that’s how a lot of vaccines work.
And now, 2 variants later, vaccinated individuals might be getting covid at a faster clip. TOLD YOU.
What, they told us the vaccine would do a great job at first and then would wane in effectiveness and still do a decent job. Really? That’s your big moment?
IN FACT, it was Fauci and the experts, from the beginning, who say the variants could cause issues, and that we’d need boosters, and that covid was here to stay. And the hilarious thing is these radicals made fun of EVERY ONE of these declarations at the time, only to champion these developments as they happened.
So so so illogical and they can’t even see it.
Nah man, take everything from the position of Trump vs.
Pfizer didn’t work with Trump and didn’t take his money. He blamed them for releasing a vaccine AFTER the election. Anything Trump doesn’t like, his minions don’t like an declare war on.
Of course, they ignore he declares himself the father of the vaccines.
Like Trump, they’ve adopted the mantra of take the credit but never the responsibility.
Lol- let’s break down the logic.
PCR is the most widely used method of detection.
PCR is designed to find a particular molecular structure and multiply it a certain amount of times. (As many “cycles” as you order it to).
If I inject you with the particular molecule it is looking for (with billions of these molecules) do we think that would create more or less false positives if I test you after injection?
And they have the perfect built in response.
Well- thank god you took the vaccine. Although you had COVID you were relatively asymptomatic due to the vaccine.
Lol.
How about most of these positives are simply picking up residuals of the COVID RNA left in the body. Most of these vaccinated people aren’t infected with COVID. They’re infected with the vaccine. Lol.
It’s not rocket science.
First off, you never once in this thread explained that this was your position. You even said “Great vaccine, right?” which is mocking the effectiveness of the vaccine.
Now it seems you’re not mocking the vaccine effectiveness but you’re instead saying these are not real covid cases. that is completely different and not at all what I thought you were suggesting based on your comment on the vaccine. I truly don’t know if you’re moving the goal posts again or getting confused about what you’re supposed to be making fun of now.
Secondly, the vaccines won’t trick the PCR tests into a positive result based on the sources I’m finding.
Do you have anything that says otherwise or are you basing this off your own expert knowledge?
1 Like
You find this answer fulfilling?
PCR means polymerase chain reaction. It’s a test to detect genetic material from a specific organism, such as a virus. The test detects the presence of a virus if you have the virus at the time of the test. The test could also detect fragments of the virus even after you are no longer infected.
So what is the PCR actually looking for?
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for COVID-19 is a molecular test that analyzes your upper respiratory specimen, looking for genetic material (ribonucleic acid or RNA) of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Scientists use the PCR technology to amplify small amounts of RNA from specimens into deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which is replicated until SARS-CoV-2 is detectable if present. The PCR test has been the gold standard test for diagnosing COVID-19 since authorized for use in February 2020. It’s accurate and reliable.
Oh wow! Look at that 305 - it looks for RNA!
Well what is the vaccine consist of? RNA! No wonder they destroyed J&J. That RNA is extracted out of their vaccine virus prior to injection so no RNA to detect. Just a viral shell.
Listen. You keep listening to the experts who were wrong on the modeling and wrong on everything up to this point. I’ll go with my own brain.
It’s a pretty simple logical inference here.
Keep everyone in a state of COVID. And then tell them the vaccine keeps them from getting serious illness so they keep getting a shot.
Lol…But make sure you keep getting those boosters, a whole bunch of them…Then you can beat big, bad omicron…I think like 17 boosters conquer it.
I agree with this. The newer strains are not as potent. Problematic yes, but we have to learn to live with it like we do the flu.
Better watch SC…They’ll take your democrat card.
Not at all. Your answer doesn’t even mention vaccines, which are central to the discussion.
…
You… you do know that not all RNA is the same, right?
That’s like saying “You see! It looks for DNA! Case closed!”
You think every DNA test comes back positive because everyone has DNA???
This has got to be one of the most idiotic scientific hot takes I’ve ever seen.
With a pretty simple catastrophic error.
Why the hostility? You laugh at people who get flu shots too? What’s the big deal about a vaccine?