Novel technology in addition to existing vaccine technology.
Relax.
What, are you gonna sit there and worry for years about what might come? Stressful way to live life, if you ask me.
Novel technology in addition to existing vaccine technology.
Relax.
What, are you gonna sit there and worry for years about what might come? Stressful way to live life, if you ask me.
Iām not sure what you mean by this. We are literally the phase 4 study for this vaccine technology. Thereās no 2 ways about that.
Because I donāt want to be responsible for damaging my children? I think thatās a highly reasonable position to take.
Particularly when they have an infinitesimal chance of dying or being injured by COVID.
Makes ZERO sense to administer to children.
Great. Parent how you parent. Donāt dictate to me how to parent. You give those who wanted to become vaccinated (and their kids) shit about wanting to be left alone for your choice to do what you want.
You donāt want to have your kids vaccinated. Fine. Your choice. Leave the rest of us alone.
I just hope you arenāt losing sleep at night worrying about how the vaccine might effect you in 10 years. Itās not likely it will - at all - and it ls also not worth it.
Why only limit damage to longterm when it can be short term as well?
Circumcision Risks
Like any other surgical procedure, there are risks in getting circumcision. But this risk is low. Problems linked to circumcision include:
- Pain
- Risk of bleeding and infection at the site of the circumcision
- Irritation of the glans
- Higher chance of meatitis (inflammation of the opening of the penis)
- Risk of injury to the penis
I think heās referring to mRNA vaccines not being invented for covid.
Itās weird. Despite GSC being vaccinated (I know it wasnāt his choice), he WANTS it to be bad for people.
All to prove a point.
None of what you listed is serious. But additionally, circumcision isnāt necessary in Christianity. It was replaced by infant baptism and in denominations that donāt do infant baptism, simply by baptism at age of consent.
Iām not really understanding the analogy however.
The mRNA vaccines carry with them long term health risks such as stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis, infertility, among others. Why extend these risks to a population that has virtually no risk of what the vaccine is supposed to protect against?
It makes zero sense.
Lolā¦Imagine drawing that conclusion
Lmfao
He already does as do most conservatives. Thereās always a Mexican hiding under the bed to take their wives and jobsā¦
And he simply doesnāt learn, ever.
Do you have proof of this, by the way? And how can you claim ālong term?ā The vaccines have been out for only a year.
Long term healths ārisks.ā
Iām saying that we donāt know In 10 years how theyāll manifest. Maybe that part got past youā¦. Not sure. But thatās what I meant.
Okā¦ā¦ but then why did you just say:
Blockquote
The mRNA vaccines carry with them long term health risks such as stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis, infertility, among others.
If we donāt know, we donāt know. Not only did you just literally state that they do cause long term health risks, you went as far as to name specific conditions.
This isnāt a fair statement to make.
Sure, he will post a bunch of academic journal entries heās never even opened, point yout to tik tok, or gwp. Thats his proof.
Maybe there is a disconnect here. There are studies out there that discuss these risks TODAY.
They have long term implications as well that we donāt know the impact of yet.
There could also be other impacts that we have no idea about. Whatās so difficult to understand.
Hi djā¦. I love you tooā¦. You little morning stalker.
Morning stalker? Iām responding to your idiotic posts on a message board.
I understand perfectly. There are studies going on (like with any new medicine/drug/vaccine) to determine if there are any long term effects. Totally get that.
But you previously stated above that the mRNA vaccines carry these risks. How do you know? Are the studies done? Have they said that they actually cause these issues in the future? Whereās your proof?
This is probably one of those times where you know you misspoke but are too proud to admit it.
Youāve spent 100% of your time responding to only my postsā¦. Ergo, stalker. Youāve been obsessed with me for years. I canāt blame you. You like the abuse.
And predictably, youāve abandoned our conversation.
Iāll take that as you conceding that you misspoke.
He runs and hides until he can make something else up
I have kid things all morning. I will respond.