Mods is this forum gonna be discourse based?

Mods,

You have a chance now to turn this part of the forum around and stamp out these conspiracy theorist who only serve to bring more parasites to the forum in droves. They can go to infowars for their fix on their warped version of reality. Will this forum continue as it was before, spreading disinformation and lies? Or will it be based discursive concepts that serve some actual basis for intellectual discourse? Now is the perfect time to begin the cleanse. What are your plans?

1 Like

Dj - it’s a good question - and for the most part as long as direct insults aren’t being thrown - I think we let it go. The good news is mods have the ability to delete posts - and ban posters as well.

Classic snowflake. Come in and troll someone and then tell on them because they said things you don’t like.

:joy::joy::joy:

Djrion = self fulfilling prophecy. Ultimate snowflake.

This isn’t Twitter or Facebook. We aren’t going to censor people when they create topics and generate conversations regardless of what political party the person is affiliated with. I don’t always agree with everything that’s posted in the Shelter. I even think some of it is far-fetched, but links are provided and debate is had. If we start picking and choosing what content we want to see then what’s the point of even having a Shelter?

The Shelter has always meant to be anything and everything not Hurricanes related. You can post about anything in here within reason. If you don’t like the content then work to change it. Posts don’t have to always be about politics. Make a post about cars, guns, music, computers or, like we had a few years back, a post with pictures of scantily clad women with large breasts and nice round asses.

4 Likes

Bahahah…A call for censorship. Pure snowflake. Pathetic.

1 Like

Couldn’t agree more @dallascanes.

I don’t understand why people even make posts like this. They have these weird control issues (very feminine).

You don’t like the content? Ignore it. These guys have ignored us for months and months. Now Trump wins and they come back and want to dictate who can speak? Very leftist of them. Now we know why they vote the way they do.

Either engage or don’t.

We dont say racist things or post pornography which I think would be the 2 clear cut areas of agreement for censorship.

So what’s the problem @djrion? Can’t win in the market place if ideas?

This is debatable. I otherwise agree that freedom of speech should exist in the shelter, minus blatant personal attacks.

Dj has wished death on posters and has used homophobic slurs on the other site.

1 Like

Ryan, what was your handle on the other site?

Zenryan

1 Like

GSC/51 got it

That’s the spirit! :rofl:

2 Likes

Careful - the soy boys will be offended by your toxic masculinity.

1 Like

Then you are part of the problem then. We let 4chan/Jones roam free. They say what they want on a forum and are scared to death to say it in public. Until we (you) start taking action, nothing will change. Thank goodness there is a movement to moderate elsewhere underway.

1 Like

Scared to say what in public soy boy? I’ll say it to you and spit in your face. You’ll stand there looking stupid and cry for the same police you wanna defund…Just like you are crying for censorship now.

Lol…Who the fuck do you think you are calling for people to ban us?..“Moderators you have a chance”…Fuck outta here.

I didn’t realize Zuckerberg and Dorsey posted here. Cool, site’s getting big time.

1 Like

Interesting. You’re far more aggressive in this site than the shelter, which is why I had trouble identifying you. It’s almost as if you removed the zen on you when changing sites.

We need people to stand up to your lies and fictional truths on reality. No on said ban, I said it needs to be moderated. You all will do a bang em up job of getting yourselves banned, I won’t be involved with that. Again, I like soy, prefer oat and almond, but soy is enjoyable as well.

1 Like

…nm

Try my response again

51 is a passive-aggressive person who enjoys doing nothing more than trying to poke at people. He also twists people’s words around, puts words in other’s mouths, lies and he does that intentionally. So I have no issues calling him out as the fake that he is.

I’m assuming that is what you’re referring to. Bc I don’t know how calling out the thread starter for wanting moderation while he wished death and used gay slurs on the old side can be considered being far more aggressive