You guys don’t seem to understand that if there is a good reason to overturn it it’s not illegal. Lol. It would be the right and just thing to do.
You don’t understand reality. So while you continue to lie to yourself about how life is a big conspiracy against you, we will continue to offer you a hand to jump across that river.
It’s not about “good reason,” it’s about whether the conspirators did anything illegal. Maybe they did, maybe they didn’t, and I don’t think these texts are necessarily a smoking gun.
BUT texts like these link conspirators together, and can link staffers like Meadows to illicit activities. So stuff like this helps fill out the puzzle.
Do you think the founders broke the law in 1776?
Do you think they had a good reason to even if they did?
What in the actual fuck. RIP and ignore this idiot founders.
Then
Can’t make this shit up. He’s a flat out traitor to the US. There’s no other way around it. Just the bottom of the barrel in terms of integrity and character. What a shitbag of a person
There’s nothing inconsistent about what I wrote.
I believe that fraud would justify the response.
But there is always going to be one side (hint hint, it’s yours) that believes, no matter what, that their actions are illegal.
The British and their Tories thought the actions the founders took were illegal. If you went by the book, they were. But the grander picture proved them right.
The inverse can be said for slavery. In 1800 you could very easily say “slavery is the law of the land” when presented with the opportunity to help a runaway slave as you retuned him to his owner. You wouldn’t have been morally right.
Some issues transcend law. This is one of them.
However, I still feel the law is actually on our side in this case. We are DOUBLY right.
You’re a liar and a hypocrite…on a daily basis. It’s as clear as day and in print
You’d be incorrect, but it follows your line of reasoning that you’re a traitor and want to bring down our country, do not believe in laws, do not believe in accountability, and are a fascist who wants authoritarian rule. Basically, you’re the lesson that even those blessed with hundreds of years of history showing what happens with X, some people are just dimwits and never learn, so we have to do it again. It’s okay. We’ll do it again just for you.
That side is called The Law. You see, you appear to believe there is the legal side and then another justifiable side. Again, you don’t believe laws apply to things you don’t want them to. It’s not that your special, it’s that you’re a dishonorable idiot.
You lost an election and didn’t like it, so you wanted to destroy the Constitution. That’s not 1776. That’s 1982…when 2nd grader Stevie didn’t get to play on the swing-set and proceeded to try and burn the playground down. You’re not a patriot or a “founder” of anything. You’re a traitor who can’t handle the truth, that’s all. Truly pathetic.
Oh the irony of this one. Point of fact, however…you have no morality.
You lost an election and can’t handle the truth? No, that just makes you the same as a child who was raised terribly and can’t handle reality. You’re not special. You’re just a traitor who wants to destroy the country because you lost an election, got conned and don’t want to admit it, and have no value for honesty or integrity. You’re the bottom of the barrel.
Not according to actual law, results, and current investigations.
Sleaze has been applied to people before, but seldom as apt as when it is applied to you.
Their own law?
No, the stooge is equating Trump to the Founders.
Before the revolution it was Great Britain’s Law.
And nobody questioned whether or not they were traitors to Britain, just like you’re traitors to the United States, right now, today.
Hard to tell if this is sarcastic or not. I’m going to assume that you’re being serious. They absolutely were accused of being traitors.
Some historians today still accuse them of such. They say that their reasons for rebellion weren’t legitimate; that they were attempts at power veiled in justice.
Not sure what could be sarcastic about that, though, I do know you fear demons under your bed and a grand global conspiracy against you, so I will attempt to be measured in my response…
No, I was serious…though, your response is just weird. That’s not an intelligent response, no way around it.
There is no doubt, with any question, in any possible interpretation, that they were anything other than traitors from the perspective of Britain. Whether or not they had reasons to rebel, if their reasons were legitimate, and whether “justice” was involved. Neither have any bearing on the argument. They were subjects to Britain and they rebelled and fought a war against Britain. There is no gray area as to whether or not they were traitors to Britain.
It is a VERY curious response on your part, though. You should re-read what you wrote. That’s not an intelligent response. That’s the type of response I expect to get from the guy on the street for Letterman or Kimmel asking the dumbest people they could find questions.
They were traitors, flat out…from the perspective of Britain. It doesn’t matter if they were justified, felt they were justified, had reasons, nothing. They were under their legal control and they rebelled and fought a war against them. Simple enough. In fact, my family on all sides fought in that war.
So…once again…they weren’t only accused of being traitors, they were traitors. I feel it’s good they were traitors, fuck King George. You have overwhelmingly weird logic…OR, you’re just not honest. You know the next statement if you own up, don’t you?
Yes, they were traitors to Britain. Yes, you are a traitor to the United States. The founders had their reasons. Your reasons are that you deny reality and fell for a two-bit carnival barker.
Well- if our elections are rigged then one can say we are living under a monarchy now as well.
Whether you believe their motivation or not is immaterial. It is their motive.
The founders fought for the right to be represented fairly and to choose those representatives freely.
Trump does the same.
Zero credible evidence whatsoever. You’re debating yourself in your own mind on this one
Immaterial to the argument entirely, bears no impact on whether or not they were traitors to Britain or not.
100% verifiably false. All evidence points to the contrary. How strange it must feel to have been had so entirely by a simple, two-bit carnival barker and con-man.
Once again, you just don’t have the ability to be honest in any way. Very sad.
The comparison is interesting, isn’t it, since it came from GSC’s mouth.
So yes, he pretty much just admitted to being a traitor.
Not at all. Many from Britain and other countries saw them as taking the morally correct approach.
There’s always a duality in these matters.
GSCl 
wn isms