Maricopa Report Analyzed = Nothing Burger

Here’s the full report: https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/azfamily.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/19/e1967608-1d99-11ec-9f0f-c394f7c3dc5f/614e7177ca92c.pdf.pdf

I’ve gone through it and will summarize for anyone interested. Quotes are directly from the actual report, such as:

“There is no reliable evidence that the paper ballots were altered to any material degree.”

VOTER, BALLOT, RESULTS FINDINGS

Mail-In Ballots Voted from Prior Address = 23,344

This is the big one. First thing, are these all illegal Biden votes? NO.

Was it a canvass? NO.

They checked a commmercial database INSTEAD of county records, and in these cases couldn’t match a name to the mailed address.

“Some error is expected within these results… It is recommended that canvassing be conducted.”

“There are potential ways [this could occur] which in some cases would not violate the law. Additional investigation by the Attorney General is recommended for any conclusive determination.”

Numbers of these ~23k ballots:

39% Registered Dem

33% Registered Pub

More Ballots Returned by Voter than Received = 9,041

The other big one.

“NOTE: An EV33 indicates that a ballot is received and does not necessarily mean the ballot was counted. It is assumed that only the first ballot received and validated is counted.”

34% Registered Dem

30% Registered Pub

Voters that Potentially Voted in Multiple Counties = 5,295

Notice that word “potentially.”

What Cyber Ninjas did was check the voter list in all 15 AZ counties and find name matches with the same birth YEAR.

“While it is possible for multiple individuals to share all these details, it is not common although the incidence here (roughly one-third of one percent) may be the rate of commonalities in identifying information between legitimate, separate individual voters especially with common last names. This list should be fully reviewed.”

Gee, you’d think these guys were doing the reviewing, right? NOPE. All they’re doing is asking questions.

Official Results Do Not Match Who Voted = 3,432

I don’t fully understand this one. There’s a discrepancy between official results and a VM55 file. Maybe someone else can shed some light here?

More Duplicates than Original Ballots = 2,592

Duplication in this sense is a normal process where the county sends a subset of damaged ballots to duplication and expects to receive the same number back. They got “extra” ones back, which likely means they weren’t properly tracked on the way out.

Extra Biden Votes = 860

Extra Trump Votes = 1492 (You can’t make this up)

In-Person Voters Who Had Moved Out of Maricopa County = 2,392

Again, using a commercial database unrelated to the voting rolls / county records. as above, they expect errors and recommend actual canvassing, which they didn’t do.

43% Registered Pub

25% Registered Dem

Voters Moved Out-of-State During 29-Day Period Preceding Election = 2,081

Same caveats as before, except this 29 days is a legal period in AZ to cast presidential-only ballots. Cyber Ninjas doesn’t think any presidential-only ballots were cast, which may affect the lower races if they’re correct.

41% Registered Pub

31% Registered Dem

Votes Counted in Excess of Voters Who Voted = 1,551

As mentioned earlier in their report (but not in my summary), this discrepancy could have something to do with the “protected voter list,” which Cyber Ninjas didn’t know about until “shortly before the release of this report.”

42% Registered Pub

30% Registered Dem

Voters Not PArt of the Official Precinct Register = 618

Cyber Ninjas understand that certain edge cases legally allow for late registration, though expect the November 7th roll to be accurate, and it was slightly off.

37% Registered Pub

34% Registered Dem

At this point the numbers are so low it’s not worth scrutinizing, but you can feel free by going to the pdf.

VOTING MACHINE FINDINGS

Apparently, the digital analysis portion of the audit isn’t complete because they just recently settled the subpoena.

There’s a lot of procedural stuff in this section that is probably important for securing future elections. I’m not really sure how this affects the Maricopa count, though, since we already audited the ballots.

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but Cyber Ninjas doesn’t appear to assert that anything illegal was done in this section. They make recommendations for future procedures to make auditing easier.

All said, reads like a giant NOTHING BURGER to me…

1 Like

And? Who ever said they were physically tampered or altered? The claim is that they were changed in other ways OR that they were either fraudulent or illegal and should not be counted.

Malicious adjudication
Dead voters
Out of state voters
Fake names
Voting twice
Etc etc etc.

They have asked (and we’re denied) and asking now for a proper canvass. Again- what the hell is your point.

The audit revealed major anomalies. They need to be looked into and properly canvassed. The county, instead of fighting the Senate, should comply and provide an independent canvass.

We could go on and on but the point here is…. You don’t want to look any further.

You want to call it a nothing burger. Why is that Mr straight down the middle, I call it like I see it, moderate?

No one. That’s an example of a quote and one of the audit’s findings. There’s no reason to be defensive - I’m just summarizing the findings.

Again, I’m summarizing their findings and their recommendations. I’m making it clear that Cyber Ninjas didn’t actually perform a canvass. Is that not an important distinction?

I could be mistaken but I understand it was the Dept. of Justice that warned against the canvass, and Fann agreed not to proceed, and had nothing to do with the county?

I just read a 96 page report. I summarized the main bulletpoints on the ballot stuff and… there wasn’t much there.

GTFO with your low-effort rebuttal. I mean, you didn’t address most of what I mentioned and you say I don’t want to dig deeper. LMAO

LOL. As expected - in the face of the actual report that found ZERO indication that ballots were tampered with, altered, or that fraud took place - the right on here continues to double down.

As expected.

I have no idea how you guys see this as a nothing burger.

Let me see if I can get the argument right. Leading up to this the narrative was that Cyber Ninjas was a joke firm and whatever came out of this didn’t matter. Then when they didn’t show a recounting of the ballots they were given showing Trump won it’s suddenly a legit audit and a nothing burger.

The only way you would say it was material is if they showed thousands of votes flipping.

I still say it’s material because it shows gross incompetence, possibly criminal conduct and still calls into question the entire election. And they clearly acted in bad faith by deleting files right before the audit and not complying with requests.

I’ll go against the CNN hot take and call this really bad.

JUNIOR MISINFORMATION STUGOTZ AND 51 NORTHAM ARE THE GUYS THAT WIVES ARE BANGING OTHER DUDES FOR YEARS AND THEY NEVER KNOW…

It didn’t find this though. That’s the entire point.

Simple enough.

  1. No crimes were proven.

  2. No fraud was proven.

And your “gross incompetence” is Karen Fann’s “less-than-perfect” so, whatever…

Do you realize that the county refused to comply with the Senate and there was no legal mechanism outside of senate subpoena power (which the county ignored).

So the audit collected what they could and produced the results they could. Now they turn it over to the AG who has much more power to compel.

It’s all up to Brnovich.

But the right doesn’t like this so they’re doing all they can to keep it alive. M
Because that’s what Trump wants!

It’s pathetic.

Let me understand this. How could you or I know if crimes were committed? I am not an Arizona or even Federal Election attorney.

Enter Brnovich…. It’s his show now.

Will he have the will and fortitude to actually look into this and determine if these “anomalies” constitute criminal indictments?

I don’t know. Only he does. I’ll be patient and pray he’ll apply the law and not play politics or become fearful of doing the right thing.

So…….this wasn’t your alamo.

Come on GSC. No one believed you when you said you’d accept these (inevitable) results. You’re proving yourself wrong.

It’s over. Much better to focus on 2022 and 2024.

:point_down:t2:

HE IS ALREADY PRESIDENT…

YOU’RE NOT GOING TO MAKE IT TO 1/1/22…

TICKEY FCKEN TOCKEY…

Yet another Republican you’ll be bashing in a week’s time…

Yawn

Of course not. There’s always another string to pull the puppet by.

WHAT IS THE PRESIDENT GOING TO DO JUNIOR MISINFORMATION STUGOTZ?

Biden’s gonna try to pass an economic bill? I don’t really know. You have a point?

#STUGOTZCALLTHISWINNING

Go Biden, amirite?

CAN OUR FAKE IT SPECIALIST EXPLAIN TO THE REST OF THE STUGOTZS WHAT HAPPENED HERE?

#STUGOTZPHONINGSTUGOTZ

No, he’s not. Just because he didn’t concede doesn’t mean he’s still president.

That’s. It how anything works