Kamala’s lack of press conferences and interviews

Vice President Kamala Harris has not held one press conference since joining the presidential race 50 days ago, underscoring her campaign strategy of keeping her policies ambiguous and perhaps flexible.

Critics say Harris’s “basement” strategy raises concerns that she is an empty political shell with intentions to do or say whatever is needed to get elected, but the Harris campaign says voters do not care about policy.

“I don’t think the American public are really interested in the minutiae of the mechanism of how she will increase taxes,” Gina Raimondo, U.S. Commerce Secretary, told CNBC Monday on Squawk Box.

Would you if you had no fucking clue what you are talking about and never won one primary vote?

1 Like

OH MY GOD 50 DAYS without a press conference!

Yeah, it’s pretty weird, right?

You’d think she’d want to get her message out there since the polls show a lot of people don’t really know her that well.

They seem to know her enough to not want Trump

Yeah, you’d think she would have done an interview last week, or a debate this week. Weird.

Yeah I think you proved my point!

Thanks for the support.

More on Kamala and her flip flops. She knows that her true opinions and beliefs are too radical. Trying to soften them or hide them now.

If your point was that she did an interview last week and she’s doing a debate tomorrow, I’m happy to help.

You pointed to last week right?

I think my post references press conferences. You know, the thing most candidates that aren’t hiding from the media and don’t need a script do?

More on Trump and his flip flops. He knows that his true opinions and beliefs are too radical. Trying to soften them or hide them now.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/slideshows/donald-trumps-10-flip-flops

Yes and I believe my response was “OH MY GOD 50 DAYS without a press conference!”

Please don’t make me relive the shock of that statement one more time, Indiana. I don’t know if my heart can take it.

Proof is in the pudding on what he campaigned on.

She has a track record as a politician. Apples and oranges but valiant effort? You tried hard to get the equivalent argument on the other side.

It is an equivalent argument. It’s also a useless argument, as I’m attempting to display.

Who cares that Trump personally loves socialized healthcare. His political calculus is he needs to be against it, so he is against it. That is the Trump we need to deal with.

The same goes for Harris. If she changes her views to better fit the mainstream, that would be the Harris we would need to deal with.

The point is that she can’t be trusted. She’s never disavowed any of them personally, at least as far as I can see. It seems like all of these anonymous sources are saying things. Random aids and such.

Hey, if you ask me, no politicians can be trusted. I’m certainly not going to trust that Trump has my best interests in mind.

As far as Harris disavowing or being vague about stuff, I think it’s a reasonable expectation that she clears up many of these positions in the debate. I would be critical of her if she didn’t.

1 Like