WHAT A SHOCKER…
WHERE IS DIAPER FACE CATFISHY SERIAL FAMILY JABBER?
DIDN’T STORM WARN YOU?
#LEARNTHEHARDWAY
#STUGOTZPRETZEL
WHY DOESN’T DIAPER FACE CATFISHY AND JUNIOR STUGOTZS COMMENT HERE?
WHY DOESN’T FRAUD IT MILLIONAIRE 90’S STUGOTZS COME DEFEND HIS FELLOW STUGOTZS?
#STUGOTZPRETZEL
She is making the case for booster shots. Your quote leaves out important context.
The data from the states show they work at reducing deaths. I’m not a fan of Pfizer as it clearly drops off after 4-6 months while Moderna appears to remain effective for longer.
How does the data show this?
They inflated deaths at the beginning.
How does a study measure that the vaccine reduces deaths or hospitalization?
What if, after a year, all the vulnerable that could die from COVID actually just died off and there’s not as many left to die?
From my last check they aren’t mandating Covid positive elderly back into hospice and nursing homes. They’re not forcing people on respirators early. They’ve developed amazing therapeutics to fight immunoresponse and inflation COVID causes.
Are these 
controlled for in the data?
It compares current numbers from states that continued to collect breakthrough data.
I don’t care about 2020 and the report doesn’t look at 2020 data.
The study shows that very few deaths and hospitalizations came from breakthrough cases.
There will always be new people that get older and fall into the vulnerable. IF your belief is correct, this is a new Flu, then even you will be at risk at some point. We all will get old.
They are using two therapeutics to fight Covid: monoclonal antibodies and Remdesivir. Ivermectin works if you take 100x the normal amounts.
Are these controlled for in the data- I would have to assume they don’t provide different treatment based on vaccination status.
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
CAN YOU SHOW US THE EQUATION
TO GET THOSE NUMBERS?
I didn’t do the study. Contact them and ask.
SO YOU HAVE NO IDEA?
I MEAN IF THE RECOVERY RATE IS 99.7+% WHAT IS LEFT FOR FAILURE?
AGAIN IF I INJECT YOU WITH A PLACEBO HOW WOULD YOU KNOW?
AREN’T YOU A PRETTY SMART GUY?
#TINYBUTTERKNIFE
Where are you getting you data from? I mean if all the tests are not valid then shouldn’t the recovery be 100% since no one can catch it?
#bigbutthurt
He’s working under the data present. That’s the mortality rate. What else is he supposed to use?
The data is garbage. Absolute garbage.
EXACTLY IF IT IS THAT HIGH THAT MEANS IT IS HIGHER…
LESS THEN THE FLU AS “THE CONSPIRACY THEORIST” PREDICTED…
WHY IS EVERYTHING THE SAME?
WHERE ARE THE STUGOTZS ON THIS?
You don’t trust data yet try to drive home your points using the data. Since that is the case, we can’t even have a discussion as we can’t even agree on what data is valid.
I’ve looked at reports on state level data and Mayo Clinic reports which back up a failing of the Pfizer vaccine to prevent transmission. The same data backs up the vaccine helping to prevent death and hospitalizations.
I’m not a vaccine backer like others. I believe it helps but don’t think mandates should happen. I also think vaccine passports are a fucking joke.
NOTICE NO ONE CAN FIND THE TOTAL DEATHS “ADJUSTED” WITH COVID?
NOTICE THE CDC STOPPED TRACKING VACCINE BREAKTHROUGHS?
BUT HEY WE ARE “CONSPIRACY THEORIST”…
CAN YOU SHOW A DISEASE THAT HAS THAT HIGH A RECOVERY RATE WITH NO “VACCINE” THAT KILLED THAT MANY PEOPLE?
Dengue. 2.5% die, millions infected, no vaccine until 2019.
NO NO NO THE SAME AMOUNT OF SUPPOSED DEATHS…
HOW MANY DIE A YEAR FROM A 99.7+% RECOVERY RATE VIRUS LIKE COVID?
Dengue infects 50-100m annually or 1.25-2.5 mil a year. You asked, I provided a virus with similar data.