Predicting climate change is just not possible. Not my words but those of physicist Stein Storli Bergmark writing on p. 774 of the IPCC’s Third Assessment Report on Climate Change. The professor wrote: "In research and modeling of the climate, we should be aware that we are dealing with a chaotic, nonlinear coupled system, and that long-term predictions of future climate states is not possible. " In essence, what we are seeing is a massive redistribution of the world’s wealth determined by political leaders using wholly flawed applications in the fields of mathematics, physics, and economics. We in the West are being played as the biggest suckers in human history. Here’s a great article from the American Thinker that exposes the lack of computational validity of models to allay predicted climactic disaster by dint of global warming.
Here’ another article I think quite interesting about the worst year to be alive in human history, the year 536. The cause of the chaos occurring in the Dark Ages had absolutely nothing to do with human activity. However, the same threat that precipitated those darkest of human times continue to be an ongoing civilizational threat about which we remain completely powerless. BTW, this is a great read.
Why 536 was ‘the worst year to be alive’](Science | AAAS)
American Thinker, who propagated the Dominion Voting story after the election that originated from a women in Minnesota who heard it through voices in her head she called “The Wind”, who thinks she’s a decapitated ghost, and then had to admit they were lying and apologize?
written by Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscout Monckton of Brenchley who works at the Heartland Institute, founded LITERALLY to spread lies that cigarette smoke doesn’t cause cancer, working DIRECTLY for and with Phillip Morris
The main source is Stein Bergmark, who wrote for Dagladet, usually considered to be a tabloid, where it was posted in the Opinion/Debate section. So, it wasn’t written by the paper or its journalists, but as an Op/Ed.
Stein Storli Bergmark, oddly, ONLY appears on the entire internet in relation to this article, as well. He is NOT listed as an IPCC scientist or contributor.
There doesn’t appear to physically be a Stein Storli Bergmark
So, in summary - the “IPCC phycisist Stein Storli Bergmark” doesn’t exist and is not an IPCC anything. The main source is an article citing him in an Op/Ed and the only link, written by a guy working for the Heartland Institute, which was built to literally work with the tobacco lobby to lie that cigarette smoke doesn’t cause cancer, on a website who’s already admitted to openly lying…