Whether it was at Tours, Lepanto, or the Gates of Vienna, we see the same two civilization clashing, and what is worrisome is the bad guys are winning. For two decades in these forums, I have warned of the serious consequences of the spread of Islam, the worst religion ever devised by mankind. Islam is spreading at an accelerated rate in Europe, but it is also similarly spreading right here in the USA. The Democrat Party is running a Muslim Communist, calling for a worldwide Intifada, to become NYC’s next mayor. In Minnesota, a Muslim Somali is running for mayor of Minneapolis.
Whenever someone poses any opposition to the Islamic
aim of world conquest, that person is automatically labelled a racist, xenophobe, Islamophobe, and therein regarded as ignorant of the real Islam which is a Religion of Peace.
Women are being raped all over the UK, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany, and Sweden. It’s unsafe for women to walk the streets in either London or Paris, while curiously, it is not unsafe in either Warsaw or Budapest. Can you guess why there is such a difference in safety? Only idiots wait around to have their world and themselves REPLACED.
Historically inaccurate. Treating all of these battles as the same conflict ignores the historical discontinuity and vastly different actors involved. These were all regional military conflicts involving different alliances and causes, not an ongoing clash between two consistent civilizations. For example, the Ottomans of 1683 were not the same as the Umayyads of 732, nor was “Christian Europe” unified in any consistent way across these centuries.
A lie. A Democratic Socialist is not a Communist.
Another lie. Inititally, he refused to condemn the slogan when asked, emphasizing his opposition to violence and his belief that language has multiple interpretations. He has instead framed the term as symbolic resistance against the Israeli occupation, not as a call to arms.
Correct. Also, we have two sitting Muslim mayors. So, at least 4 current and potential Muslim mayors throughout the country is the context…out of 1400 mayors.
World Conquest. I don’t recall a Muslim attempting World Conquest a single moment in history. Not the Umayyads, not the Abbasid Caliphates, not the Ottoman Empire, not the Mughals, not the Safavids, not the Moors.
Who has attempted World Conquest? Alexander the Great - Macedonia. Genghis Khan - Mongols. Tamerlane - Mongols. Napoleon Bonaparte - France. Adolf Hitler - Germany
So, out of the entire planet and all of documented history - potentially one of the ONLY groups who’ve never tried to take over the world were Muslims. Again, another lie on your behalf.
Strange, I don’t recall you posting the same things about the weekly reports from US Youth Pastors and Catholic Priests.
False. Both London and Paris rank lower on the crime index than places like Jacksonville, FL, Albuquerque and Milwaukee. Are women safe to walk the street in Arizona?
Funny, you pretend to be an advocate for Western Civilization whilst being singularly loyal to Russia, from the East and an avid opponent of the West for over 100 years.
Tours, Lepanto, and Vienna are frequently grouped together inasmuch as they all marked the successful halting of eras of Islamic expansionism. There is nothing wrong with my citation.
The ultimate goal of Islam IS world-wide conquest or submission. Islamists want the world to be one big Ummah, Dar al Islam. Just this month, we heard the Iranian head ayatollah proclaim that Islam should conquer the world. Not a day passes on this planet that innocents are not murdered, raped, and otherwise maltreated in the name of Allah. Submission to Islam is relinquishing every human unalienable rights. Under Islam, men are proclaimed superior to women. Women are regarded as less intelligent than men. Islam curses people of other religions and calls its followers to violence. Having women as sex slaves is permissible under Islam as was done by the perfect human Mohammad himself. Homosexuals must choose between the noose or total submission to Allah. Since Islam means submission, there are no guarantees of individual freedom. Compared with 1,400 years of Islam, even Nazism seems rather tame…
As I see it, we’ve had Charles Martel, Don Juan of Austria, and King John Sobieski put the brakes on Islamic hegemony. Now, we can add to this list the names of Donald Trump and Benjamin Neytanyahu. La Reconquista ha regresado! BTW, in the Spanish language, capitalization of words is very limited compared to English, but the word Reconquista is always capitalized.
In reading Marx, Engels, and Lenin, communism and socialism are used interchangeably. Socialism is communism.
Then, why hasn’t there EVER been an Islamic empire who tried it? We have ample evidence of virtually all other civilizations trying it, but never an Islamic one. Once again, false.
And Christians want the world to be one in which they dominate and everyone serves their religion as well. Atheists would prefer the world be secular. Erroneous statement
False.
A hardline cleric named Hossein Noori Hamedani reportedly stated (via Fars News) that Muslims should “fight the Jews and vanquish them so that the conditions for the advent of the Hudden Imam be met.”
The ayatollah’s statements contained none of the claims you’ve made, and pertained only to the relations with the US and Israel. Once again, a lie.
Another lie. I don’t recall any rape ever being in the name of Allah. Muslims have raped people just like Christians. Not a day passes without a Christian raping someone or a Jew. Considering the raping going on by the IDF, I’m not surprised you’re trying to deflect.
Just like submission to any religion. The only one in this conversation in praise of stripping away rights is you and the Trump administration which you favored with your vote.
Just like in the Trump administration and all evangelical Christianity, along with almost all historical Christianity. Also, GSC and Skeeter.
So does Christianity. The most violent people on the planet right now are in the state of Israel.
You mean like Thomas Jefferson? Slavery was acceptable in the Bible and Christians used the Bible to justify slavery. Who invented the Atlantic Slave Trade? Jews also had slaves, as discussed in the Hebrew Bible. The Talmud elaborates on the biblical rules of slavery. Current Islam does no allow for slavery. Modern terrorist groups have claimed to have slaves, like ISIS, for sure. But, I can cite you 10 recent stories of Americans holding slaves. That doesn’t mean American endorses slavery just like the actions of ISIS don’t represent all of Islam. Once again, a lie.
You mean like this guy?
or this guy?
or this guy?
There are no guarantees of individual freedom in the Trump administration, of which you voted for.
Empirically false. Another lie.
We’ve been through your views extensively, and you’ve yet to go more than two sentences in any of your posts without a lie. Your historical references are nearly always flawed and easily disproved. To be candid, your judgement is terrible by almost every measure.
False. While all three could use them interchangeably in the 19th century, they are referring to stages of a post-capitalist system led by a revolutionary proletariat, not electoral reform movements within a capitalist democracy.
Democratic socialism, as practiced or proposed in much of the modern West, is not about abolishing markets, private property, or the state, it’s about using democratic institutions to achieve more equitable economic outcomes, like universal healthcare, labor protections, and social safety nets. That’s a far cry from Leninist one-party rule or the abolition of capitalism.
Trying to equate Bernie Sanders of Scandinavian welfare states with Soviet Communism by cherry picking 19th century terminology is not an argument- its a scare tactic and just another reminder that you’ve yet to go two sentences without a flat out lie.
Awww…is that the publication owned by Alexander Lebedev who is a Russian oligarch and former KGB agent? That’s cute.