I guess if you can’t attack WHAT they are doing and why it’s wrong then just attack them personally?
Why does their age matter?
They are finding ridiculous examples of waste, fraud and abuse. Aren’t you in favor of that? Why is that partisan?
Because they are kids accessing private data of all US citizens without clearance and any vetting, directed by someone who has business in the very payments systems they illegally gained access to and installed back doors.
Are they? Then, why were they putting thumb drives and hard drivers into the systems? If they were finding waste, read only access is all that is required.
If they were looking for ridiculous examples of waste, fraud and abuse, they’d be looking at the Pentagon. Of course, they never do. It was Trump who gave the Pentagon even more than they asked for in their budget, right after they failed their 3rd audit and can’t account for trillions. Also, they are breaking the law, not that you ever cared about the actual law before. DOGE isn’t a legally established agency. It’s from an executive order. It has nno long term legal standing and no funding or authorization by Congress.
DOGE has been given access to Treasury payment systems, USAID data, and other federal records. Via force.
Laws DOGE is Violating (or at Least Bypassing):
- The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a)
- Federal agencies need a legal reason to access personal information (like Social Security, tax data, or employee records).
- DOGE? It has no legal basis. Just an EO. That’s not enough.
- The Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 31)
- Government records belong to the government, not individual agencies.
- DOGE is not a real agency under federal law. So… what exactly gives it the right to demand access?
- The Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.)
- If a federal agency wants to do something big, it’s supposed to go through public notice and transparency processes.
- DOGE? It skipped that step.
Why is that partisan? Well, first off conservatives don’t believe in either the law nor the Constitution, so its very nature is partisan. Secondly, Elon stated that legally mandated things like Medicaid and USAID are illegal (with no detail or reasoning) and that he personally has the unilateral right to end Congressionally mandated funds to be spent in particular projects/programs as mandated in the Constitution.
Waste, fraud and abuse are the pillars of a Trump presidency. You adore all 3 in reality as long as they are all tinted with dishonesty. That last one appears to be your baseline for all things.
Bahahahahah
He’s a complete mess.
Enjoy the meltdown boys…Good shit.
Trump is doing a splendid job in support of taxpayers not footing the bills for leftist give away programs that are not in concert with Trump’s America First program. USAID was created by executive order and can be ended by same, its useful programs transferred to other more responsible agencies such as the Marco Rubio-led Department of State.
What could be more in accord with the Constitution than ending Affirmative Action and its attendant DEI initiatives… Racial discrimination, even when authorized by government, creates victims and flies in the face of neutral criteria for advancement such as merit. That DEI is a compelling government interest does not render it being a constitutional practice, for it violates the 14th Amendment.
VDH writes an excellent article about DEI.
While Trump has positioned himself as an opponent of what he calls “leftist giveaway programs,” his administration did not significantly reduce government spending. In fact, under Trump, the national debt increased by $7.8 trillion, driven in part by tax cuts that reduced revenue and increased deficits. Furthermore, programs like the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)—a massive government aid effort—were enacted under his administration, benefiting businesses and individuals across the political spectrum that was riddled with theft having the qualification barriers removed by said Trump administration.
USAID operates under congressional authorization and appropriations, meaning Congress controls its funding and operations. Ending USAID would require legislative action beyond a unilateral executive order.
USAID is a critical tool of U.S. diplomacy, helping to stabilize foreign nations through humanitarian aid, economic development, and disaster relief. It serves U.S. national security interests by reducing the need for military intervention, strengthening alliances, and curbing global instability that could otherwise affect the U.S. Eliminating or transferring USAID’s functions could weaken American influence abroad, undermining the “America First” doctrine by reducing U.S. leadership in global affairs
Marco Rubio is not, and has never been, the leader of the Department of State. The State Department is an executive branch agency headed by the Secretary of State, appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. While Rubio is a U.S. Senator with strong foreign policy views, he does not run the State Department.
- The 14th Amendment was originally designed to remedy racial discrimination, not to enforce colorblind policies that ignore historical and systemic inequities.
- The Supreme Court has recognized that some race-conscious policies can be legally justified to ensure equal opportunity, rather than being seen as a violation of equal protection.
- That said, the Court’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023) significantly curtailed race-based admissions in higher education, indicating a shift away from race-conscious policies. However, this ruling does not automatically extend to all DEI initiatives across government and business.
Of course, Trump’s actions and GOP support directly violate the 14th Amendment
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5123812-birthright-citizenship-lawsuit-gop-lawmakers/
As for VDH
One cannot be a DEI hire if they are an elected representative. Mayors are elected. What VDH and people like you try to veil is that you view any minority or woman in any position as a a DEI hire and not worthy of their job. His 2nd paragraph discredits his entire article.
The Santa Ynez Reservoir, with a capacity of 117 million gallons, was emptied for repairs and remained offline when the fires occurred
Yet, Trump claimed immediately it was because of DEI programs
For decades, the conservatives have repeatedly defended police who shot unarmed black people for doing things as little as getting their insurance from the glove box when it was requested. Yet, the junkie trying to break in and attack Congress somehow was excluded bc she was unarmed? Of course not. She was defended bc she was an insurrectionist white bitch who tried to break into Congress to harm them and got killed, like she should have.
More misinformation, seemingly all the VDH ever does these days.
Despite the absence of permanent barriers due to repair, alternative security measures were in place. For instance, a police SUV was stationed at a key intersection to deter unauthorized vehicle entry. However, during the attack, the perpetrator bypassed this obstacle by driving onto the sidewalk, leading to tragic consequences.
“In 2019, the Trump led-FAA introduced a new hiring program aimed at broadening the applicant pool for air traffic controllers. This initiative sought to enhance diversity within the workforce. However, it’s important to note that all candidates, regardless of background, were still required to meet the stringent certification standards set by the FAA.”
“DEI is an ideology or a protocol that supersedes disinterested evaluation.”
There is no uniform DEI “protocol” that inherently supersedes fair evaluation—its application depends on the policies of individual institutions.
“It is akin to the era of Jim Crow, when talented individuals were irrationally barred from consideration due to their mere skin color.”
Jim Crow laws were state and local statutes that explicitly enforced racial segregation and denied opportunities to Black Americans.DEI programs are not legally enforced like Jim Crow laws, but critics argue that some race-based affirmative action policies create preferential treatment.
“Like any system that prioritizes identity over merit—whether Marxist-Leninist credentials in the old Soviet Union or tribal bias in the contemporary Middle East—a complex society that embraces tribalism inevitably begins to become dysfunctional.”
Trump is literally purging the government of anyone not loyal to MAGA. The irony is palpable.
Let’s take a look at a few, shall we?
Biden’s Sec of Defense
Served 41 years in the military, rising to the highest ranks
Commander of US Central Command 2013-2016
Led U.S. military operations in the Middle East, including the fight against ISIS.
Oversaw operations in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and other strategic regions.
Vice Chief of Staff of the Army (2012–2013)
The second-highest-ranking officer in the U.S. Army, responsible for daily operations
Commander of U.S. Forces in Iraq (2010–2011)
Decorated Military Leader, Awards include the Silver Star, Legion of Merit, and the Defense Distinguished Service Medal.
Trump’s appointee
U.S. Army National Guard Officer (2003–present, inactive status
Deployed to Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Earned two Bronze Stars and a Combat Infantryman Badge for his service.
Fox News Contributor & Host
Veterans Advocacy: Former CEO of Concerned Veterans for America, a conservative veterans’ group advocating for VA reform where he got fired.
Told Congress he’d quit drinking if they gave him the job
Or, maybe Tucker’s kid
Or Dan Scavino, who was Trump’s caddy
Or Tulsi Gabbard who has zero intelligence experience
Or Sean Duffy from the Real World
or when he appointed his son’s wedding planner to Head Federal Housing Agency in NY, NJ
the list goes on and on
A reminder from Darren J Beattie, who was fired for attending a Nazi rally in the first term but rehired by Rubio just a few days ago
All that being said, I’ve run out of papers. Do you have a Philly you can spare?
Race consciousness is at the very heart of DEI. I think VDH makes an excellent argument that it constitutes racism, and creates new classes of victims. If Democrats vociferously oppose elimination of DEI, they can appeal to the judiciary, but I think recent Supreme Court decisions indicate that their efforts to justify the practice legally will ultimately fail.
Merit is the most telling factor in evaluating humans’ ability to perform. Under DEI, the NBA would be charged to include more whites and Asians. Hence, sporting ability would be secondary to ethnicity which is patently absurd.
AKA…I need a 5 minute break from my meltdown
So funny to watch
https://x.com/andreasjames/status/1886968773682586003?s=42
She hit the nail on the head.
Zero based budgeting.
lol- every decision we make as a government (financially) would be in this system. It’s an audit you knucklehead. It’s well overdue.
Per the lawsuit- hard to imagine a court telling the president he can’t execute an audit on his own department.
By the way-
Politico, Assicated Press, BBC
ALL ON USAID PAYROLL!
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1887147292412490111?s=46&t=0cVvr7Qw9Dh_qaQAoDJAoQ
And this is who you follow lol. Burn it all down!
That’s because you’re a racist and it has defined your life more than anything else. You were writing with your more intellectual half about it as far back as 1977. You were bitching to the Dean of your college in 2004 about Muslims in the classroom. I have the paper.
Historically, you’re quite incorrect. With the compromised Supreme Court we currently have, potentially.
Not according to your party and those of which you support. Loyalty to a single individual is the most telling factor for service and the only one they care about, second only to nepotism.
False. This argument misrepresents the principles of DEI and makes a flawed assumption about how DEI would be applied to professional sports like the NBA. DEI initiatives generally aim to create opportunities and remove barriers for underrepresented groups, not mandate proportional representation. The NBA, like all professional sports, operates as a meritocracy where skill and performance determine inclusion. There is no systemic exclusion of white or Asian players preventing them from participating if they have the necessary talent. If DEI were to be applied to the NBA in a way consistent with its actual goals, it would focus on ensuring fair access to coaching, management, and executive positions, where there has historically been under-representation of certain groups. The league’s player demographics result from competitive dynamics, not structural barriers. The argument implies that DEI would override merit-based selection in the NBA, which is a misunderstanding of how DEI works in practice. There’s no systemic exclusion of groups needing intervention, so applying DEI in the way suggested would be unnecessary and irrelevant.
Yeah, I’m sure that was it
Relating to your comment, once again, false.
of course, we know the actual reason
You know, back in the day there was this teacher, a linguist, at the University of West Florida. She had quite a few articles and thoughts on your DEI issues as it relates to women. You should read some of her work.
She was a member of the “W” community, for Women and the Equal Opportunities Committee at UWF. I wonder what she would think of your position.
Yup and the little cunt says thanks you and begs for more…
Enjoy the meltdown my friend.
He’s a racist too, right? ^^
His wife told me so
Racist little cuck boy…Get a spine and throw that trashy little whore’s shit out out on the street before she gets home from her next blm rally.
Awww…Shitstain, are your little feelers hurt because you’ve never contributed anything to literally anyone in your unemployed, loser of a life? Even your recruiting lists suck. For fun I went back and checked 22 and 23. Your batting average is less than blind cocker spaniel 
What a fucking loser
This guy explains Trump perfectly
Whats amazing is GSC honestly believes trump is not a criminal.
How’d history go for you this past November, racist cuck boy?
You guaranteed victory countless times on this message board.