You don’t think a mathematical anomaly that happens 4 days after an election is evidence?
Can’t help you dude. Sorry.
1 Like
I can’t help you - dude - if you don’t have proof of something you WANT to have happened……but can’t prove it.
Dems Steal Another One
Man, they should have stolen the governor’s race while they were at it. What were they thinking?!?!
Sound like he counted his chickens before they hatched and now he’s butthurt.
It’s fucking rediculous. The Bikki’s ans QSC’s of the world have gone entirely to the “heads, I win - tails you lose” mentality.
These morons forgot that sometimes you’re SUPPOSED to lose. And sometimes you’re SUPPOSED to win.
But, I don’t like who won, so, fraud. Cool.
And if she got a realistic number right then maybe I wouldn’t be suspect.
The numbers don’t jive with Clark county registration numbers.
We’d have to believe that 80-90% of these “non party affiliated” voters (independents) all broke for the Democrat. Is that reasonable?
Can’t wait for y’all to file all those lawsuits that’ll get dismissed.
Prove there was fraud.
1 Like
Masto received 480k votes. What 80-90% are you talking about?
51- I just posted Clark County which is the largest county in Nevada. Those are the numbers.
Dems represent ~34% of registered voters. On Election Day they couldn’t break 50%.
4/5 days after their rate went up to 63%.
That would mean that something like 95% of all other voters besides republicans would have to have voted dem.
You think that’s reasonable?
But they cheated!
Russia ABSOLUTELY was in it with trump to get him elected in 2016.
It happened.
Makes my point even stronger.
Not all registered active voters vote. The amount of non democrat votes she received is an anomaly.
Notice they always come AFTER Election Day is over. What a coincidence!
I’m seeing a lot of assumptions and no proof.
Prove it.
And let’s all remember if there was an anomaly the other way QSC and Bikki wouldn’t say shit.
No it doesn’t. It looks like you pulled the 80-90% out of your ass and didn’t do any actual math.
You can’t use math as your logical foundation without doing actual math, bud.
2+2=5 only when QSC and Bikki need it to. 
This is literally the dumbest thing I’ve ever possible read.
So you have a district with 466k registered Democrats and 339k registered Republicans, that is 58% Dem, and you are upset it went 63% Dem?
There are 500k other voters in that district - is that what your screenshot is saying? And you think 80-90% of them needed to go Dem for them to squeak out a win? Help me out here because I don’t see your math.
Lol- no I didn’t. No matter how you slice it the numbers don’t jive.
Take half the electorate as voted. Same numbers would still apply. Nevada is a purple state. It’s usually decided by independents. So now we have to believe that on Election Day- repubs won that vote but then lost it when mail ins came in?
Insanity.
1 Like
The French are smart. They all vote on ONE day. Mail-in ballots are forbidden due to past corruption. Everybody votes, and before the day is done, the French know who won. No state in the United States has a larger voting population than France, and presto France counts them all the same day, all without bunko voting machines. Notice how all the late votes favor the Democrat crooks. Mathematical anomalies should be ignored. What do statisticians know? Anyone suggesting fraud is a horrible DENIAR, perhaps even a racist like those who prevented Stacey Adams twice from being governor. There is more fairness in the Russian Politburo. Democrats would elect Putin if ran as a Democrat in spite of his having a fully functional brain.
You can fool muttonheads easily, but fooling GSC just isn’t going to happen. The same goes for the Prince of the Panhandle.
They only go one way bikki lol.
So so so convenient.
No you didn’t pull the numbers out of your ass?
Then can you show me where you got them please? It’s a simple request.
So you have a district with 466k registered Democrats and 339k registered Republicans, that is 58% Dem, and you are upset it went 63% Dem?
There are 500k other voters in that district - is that what your screenshot is saying? And you think 80-90% of them needed to go Dem for them to squeak out a win? Help me out here because I don’t see your math.