THE MAYOR OF SURFSIDE WAS JUST ASKED IF JOHN MCAFEE’S FILES WERE IN THAT BUILDING…
HIS ANSWER: I HAVE NO IDEA…
NO DENIAL…
SAME MAYOR THAT CANE OUT DAY ONE SAYING BUILDINGS DON’T FALL IN THE UNITED STATES LIKE THAT…
THEY DON’T…
So the connection is that McAfee had some kind of info in that building?
LOOK AT THE DATE…
TRYING TO CONFIRM THAT LAST TWEET…
FIRST ONE IS CONFIRMED…
NOW YOU SEE WHY PEOPLE COULDN’T GET THEIR PETS AND THEY HAD TO BRING THE REST DOWN?
Wow. So what did McAfee have again that was so dangerous to them?
Conversations and data that he picked up?
GSC HOW WOULD THE MAYOR ANSWER THAT QUESTION LIKE THAT IF HE DIDN’T KNOW?
WOULDN’T HIS ANSWER BE WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
HE DIDN’T SAY THAT…
HE JUST SAID HE DIDN’T KNOW WHICH MEANS HE FCKEN KNOWS…
THAT IS WHY THEY RUSHED TO BURY THE REST OF THE BUILDING…
MAYBE THEY DIDN’T TAKE DOWN WHAT THEY NEEDED…
WE SHALL SEE BUT THE MAYOR’S ANSWER AND REACTION TELL THE STORY…
NOW YOU SEE WHY TUCKER ASKED THE MAYOR IF IT THE BUILDING WAS BROUGHT DOWN INTENTIONALLY?
THIS IS PROBABLY PART OF THE REASON THEY WERE SPYING ON TUCKER…
USA TODAY IS NOW DENYING THE REPORT…
WHAT ELSE WOULD THEY DO?
I BELIEVE THE MAYORS REACTION AND MY PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE NOT THE FAKE NEWS…
THE OBAMA MAFIA TREASON TRIALS ARE COMING…
I’m not questioning you… I just haven’t really followed this McAfee story closely.
It popped up so quickly and out of left field. Need to look into it more.
I’ve devoted all the time I have to keeping up with the Az audit and other potential audits. It’s all I really care about at this point.
So your theory is that this was a planned demolition to take out McAfee’s stuff, but they blew up the wrong building section?
Genius.
So then they need to blow up more of the building quickly.
All to destroy digital evidence that would be duplicated in multiple places…
The tweet about McAfee owning a unit in Surfside was fake. No public record of him owning a unit there. Does anyone have any proof that he did?
NO STUGOTZ I KNOW THE BUILDING WAS TAKEN DOWN…
WHY IS THE QUESTION…
HOW WOULD YOU KNOW THAT?
SO WHY DIDN’T THE MAYOR SAY THAT?
HIS ANSWER WAS “NO IDEA”…
WHY IS THIS COMING OUT NOW TWO WEEKS LATER?
LETS SEE WHAT HAPPENS…
JUNIOR WASN’T THE AP THE NEWS ORGANIZATION THAT WAS IN THE HAMAS OWNED BUILDING?
YOU KNOW HAMAS THE TERRORIST?
THAT IS YOUR SOURCE?
That’s probably because he was asked a random question that he didn’t know the answer to. If someone’s unable to confirm or deny with specific info, usually that means you have no idea…
Why is what coming out, the fake tweet?
Who cares why the fake tweet came out.
Pick whatever source you want.
In fact, show me a single source that says McAfee owned a unit…
THE QUESTION IS DID JOHN MCAFEE HAVE HIS FILES IN THE BUILDING?
YOU THINK THAT WOULD BE A “NO IDEA” ANSWER?
SPECIFIC FILES OF A FAMOUS PERSON?
TRY HARDER…
IT IS A REPORTER A PRESS CONFERENCE THAT HAPPENS DAILY…
AGAIN TRY HARDER…
THE ONE THAT ASKED THE FCKEN QUESTION…
TUCKER CARLSON THAT ASKED THE MAYOR IF THE BUILDING WAS BROUGHT DOWN ON PURPOSE…
THOSE ARE NOT RANDOM QUESTIONS…
THE MAYOR SAID “BUILDINGS DON’T FALL LIKE THAT IN THE UNITED STATES.”
Yes. How would the mayor possibly know this?
Yes, a reporter asking about a fake tweet…
LMAO a question is NOT a source!!!
AT NO TIME DOES THE REPORTER SAY THAT HE “SAW A TWEET” TO BASE HIS QUESTION…
REPORTERS ASK QUESTIONS BASED ON INFORMATION THEY ARE GIVEN…
IF HE DIDN’T WOULDN’T HE ASK WHAT THE FCK THE REPORTER WAS ASKING?
THAT IS WHAT NORMAL PEOPLE ASK WHEN THEY GET A QUESTION THEY HAVE ZERO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT…
Are you serious? Journalism has become a sad echo chamber for social media. Journalists do this all the time.
Not if he heard about the fake tweet too…
Look, what are you so defensive about? All I asked if if you have a source that confirms McAfee had a unit in the Surfside condo.
It’s a yes or no question…
I agree with Storm that this isn’t really the relevant question. It’s really “was there info there that McAfee was storing”…
Remember, they said dead man switch which could mean it goes to a third party or device.
It doesn’t matter what the smoking gun is… the same followup question applies.
What is the evidence that the info was there???