Border wall

So now you’re playing dumb and sticking your head in the sand?

I directly answered your question twice.

The most you have is to come back with a “nope” and then change the subject and hope no one notices?

It’s a bad look, bro.

Dude- you’re not a fan of Miami. You’re here because you’re Dallas’s old high school/college buddy. That’s cool but you’d think you wouldn’t be such a ducking embarrassment to the guy.

Lol. You have #2 teams? What are you, 6? Fucking dork.

Sticking my head in the sand? By coming back and answering you and then making more posts? I think you need to go research what that phrase means.

There’s this little thing called “progression of an argument.”

Camera exposure limits don’t explain why 2 photos with the same camera show 2 different things.

And then you said “but the first image is a CG Diagram. Ok- then you agree with me because my entire original point in this whole matter was that the picture was a painting/drawing/CGI.

Genius Djrion actually thought it was real as evidence by him arguing with me.

I’m calling everyone dumb because they believe we sent a probe 7,000,000 miles away when we’ve admitted over and over that we can’t leave low earth orbit.

You’re conflating.

I’m not taking a side here…But this is a clear cop out

Human goatee went crickets real quick didn’t he??

Bahahahahahah

Teams
#1
#2
#3

Friends
#1 Dallas
#2 whoever
#3 (dj…Warden has to say dj or dj will cry)

Ice cream
#1 Rocky Road
#2 Chocolate
(I’m sorry I meant to say chocolate #1!!! Please liberal cunt girlfriend! Please I’m sorry…I have self reflected (again) and Inow fully know what I said was racist!)

Colors
#1 Blue
(OR wait, pink!!! I meant pink dj sorry! I know boys can like pink today to…I’m sorry dj!!!..we are still besties right!!)

He doesn’t play it and he breaths sand for a living.

Agree with what? That a CG diagram is CG? Is that what this entire argument is about?

Do you not see the idiocy of the whole thing?

Should I start a new thread about how the Simpsons is an animation and not real life?

What exactly is your point in all of this?

Talk about conflating. You just compared probes to manned flight, and a statement about practical readiness to historical possibility. You’re the king of conflation.

The sad fact of the matter, GSC, if you thought a CG image with stars looked fake and claimed it was proof of a hoax, when the reality was it looked fake because it was a Photoshop mockup, and a bad one at that.

I know that must be embarrassing for you. I would be too. Pretending you didn’t make a mistake and that “you were right” is making it much worse.

Have some pride, my man.

Then go talk to your boys. You can go up top and read… He posted a picture I said that’s not a real picture he tried to defend the fact that it was a real picture and then warden jumped on his back.

You would be 100% correct, if we had already not passed that threshold with manned flight and landed on the moon, “supposedly”

I didn’t see anyone say it was real. You asked:

And people gave satisfactory answers to your question.

Then you go on with:

Continuing your imbecilic mistake.

Now yes, Warden answered this by talking about exposure settings again. It’s possible he didn’t even look at the photo, because certainly we can take pictures of space with stars, because that is how camera exposures work. I can do it outside my house at night if I want.

If you pay attention, you’re the only one in the thread attempting to use a bad article header image to prove a moon landing hoax.

Then you post clips about an astronaut saying the ISS has never left lower earth orbit and some other unrelated nonsense, like a celebrity saying the earth is a closed system.

Then, for some strange reaason, you post a PBS article saying that we have never left Earth’s atmosphere because the Moon is within Earth’s atmosphere. It seems a strange thing for someone who doesn’t believe in the Moon landing to post. Then again, posting sources that disagree with your statements are par for the course with you.

See what I mean?

Your entire argument hinges on on a poorly produced MS Paint image. And you’re using it to prove a point. And then you’re pretending you never did.

I guess you said it best:

At least now you’ll stop pretending that I didn’t directly answer your question.

So you’re telling me this isn’t him implying the photo is a real photo?

Really dude?

Why didn’t he just say “yea, it’s an animation, here’s the real photo?”

Want to know why? He thought it was real! Lol. So did Warden. It’s my entire point.

No one can tell what’s real from what NASA puts out because 99% of their shit is either CGI, Green screens, or composite images.

Whatever DJ believed, his response was just laughing at you for jumping into his thread with a conspiracy theory.

But let me join him in LMAO at you after reading the rest of your post. you just blame everyone else for making the mistake and still haven’t admitted to yours.

Moron

Has nothing to do with the photo.

It has to do with you denying it at the onset and developing a conspiracy theory to soothe your peafuckingbrain.

Not to mention, where are the asterisks in the screenshot of the OP?

I’ll help you out. They are on the text. I never even paid attention to the image lol.

Let’s clear this up

GSCl :lying_face: wn, do you or do you not believe that NASA successfully used DART while filming it?

So much work for something so corny.

I don’t believe we ever left low earth orbit, as repeatedly testified to by government agents and elected officials.

You’ll never convince me, unless you have some rock solid undeniable defeater, that we went to the moon and now with 1,000,000,000 x the technology and know how we’re stuck.

You can be a fucktard if you want to be. I refuse.

I’m not going to get into the debate if we did or didn’t go to the moon.

But, I’ve often wondered why we never went back and why no one but the US ever sent humans to the moon.

Now, I’ve googled this and tried to find answers and they just don’t seem that good.

All of the answers say that it’s basically because it’s too expensive. 116 Billion in today’s dollars or something.

We’ve just spent like 100 Billion on Ukraine!

You’re telling me we can’t spend 100 Billion on something like this?

And no one in the world has the technology that we do or even tried to get there?

Again, I haven’t done a ton of research on this but I always wondered why we did it and then just said screw it, all good.

And China or someone else just can’t get to the level that we were at in 1970?

It’s the dumbest argument ever Indiana.

No other area of technology can you show me where we’ve regressed. That’s not how technology works.

The simple answer is that it was all propaganda to create morale and induce the population into patriotic zeal.

There are all sorts of anomalies like the flag waving. No dust kick up from the vessel landing. Shadows going in multiple directions.

It’s all bullshit.

We have Branson and Musk celebrating low earth orbiting. Why? That’s like driving from Ny to Delaware when Magellan already sailed around the world.

Such nonsense.

That’s not the question though. He asked you if you believe the DART mission happened. It’s an unmanned rocket/satellite that hit a meteor.

We did. Several times.

I guess you can stop wondering!

China’s rocket technology is quickly advancing, but they were WAY behind us so they’re a bad example. 20 years ago the capital city of their country had streets dominated by bicycles.

I see you’re ignoring my manned dirigible comment again.

Technology regresses all the time. Records were better than CDs. CDs were better than mp3s. We used to be able to make phone calls when the local power grid cut out. Appliances used to last longer. Electronics used to be repairable. Video games used to be sold complete. Film was vastly superior to the following video tape craze and early digital offerings. Houses used to be built out of tougher materials. Asbestos is superior insulation. Freon is a superior coolant. Everything sprayed better with CFCs. Roman concrete was unmatched until about 50 years ago. I could go on and on because technology regresses ALL THE TIME.

And some of these examples may be flippant, but the point is not to underestimate those old analog technologies. Many of them were quite superior to their digital replacements for quite a while.

I’ve said it 3 times now. I don’t believe we ever went higher that lower earth orbit. This opinion includes manned and unmanned vessels.

Wait, you don’t believe we’ve ever shot anything out into space? Like a rocket or space junk or anything?

As I maintain.

No need to have a conversation with filthy vile like GSCl :lying_face: wn

Notice how he tried to change the subject and blame me ITT.

Well, I cleared up his point FOR HIM and why ive been arguing with a fucking drooler all thread. I was EXACTLY right the entire thread while he’s lost in some fucking fantasy conspiracy theory he dreams up to make his own ego feel better about his intellectual incapabilities.

Grown man with the intellect of a 3 year old.

GSCl :lying_face: wn is absolutely an embarrassment to the entire human civilization from the begining until now.