Biden Admin creates Disinformation Governance Board

Straight out of 1984. It’s the Ministry of Truth!

The person in charge of the board is one of the folks pushing the Russian collusion hoax and pouring cold water on the Hunter Biden laptop story.

This is the response to Musk taking over Twitter.

This is the type of thing you see in Communist Russia or China.

2 Likes

You’re lost, dude. Just too far gone

So you think this is a good thing?

They are especially targeting minority communities. Seems racist, no?

Warden loves this stuff so long as it’s targeted at people he doesn’t like or agree with. That’s always his modus operandi.

1 Like

And

Read both articles. My point stands.

Well the first one isn’t really an article but begins to lay out the unregistered foreign agents in the trump administration who were caught, prosecuted, and found guilty. You guys like to lie about the “Russia Russia Russia hoax“ and pretend that there wasn’t a lot that came out of it. Lots of trump staffers went down for illegal shit. Trump begged for Russian interference himself, multiple times. Is there a smoking gun, nope. Did the investigation uncover a bunch of immoral and illegal shit? Hell yes it did.

The second one is an article and rightfully points out some good stuff on both sides of the argument, that ultimately ends with none of it has anything to do with Joe.

I still find it funny that your guys “eye” witness is a blind guy. Shit makes me laugh everytime I remember that story.

But none of that even addresses the fact that the admin created a Ministry of Truth. Straight out of Orwell!

No, not really. The Ministry of Truth was designed to put out propaganda, designed to lie to the people. You should read the book. It’s a good read.
This is designed to fight Russian disinformation, which I understand can threaten your belief system. So much of the recent GOP talking points come directly from Russian sources these days. The other objective is the fight over the disinformation smugglers in South America are using to convince people to come into the country.

I’ve read it a couple of times and enjoyed it.

I’m not interested in the Department of Homeland Security putting a person in charge of determining what is true and what isn’t. And it would seem that there could be pretty bad implications for free speech if this person doesn’t like what they deem to be misinformation.

Remember, we live in an age where speech is considered violence and actual violence (BLM riots) is considered free speech. It’s backwards.

Based upon your history is misinformation and support thereof, I can see how you’d be troubled. It’s okay, though. You’ve managed to disregard reality so far.

Love it. You know you got them when they don’t address the topic.

One person in charge of what is considered misinformation is a really bad thing. Glad you guys agree.

One person isn’t in charge of misinformation. There’s a whole department. Also, what are they going to do outside of say, “hey, that’s not accurate”?

Again, like with Ukraine earlier, you get clearly shown what happened, piece by piece with source material and STILL respond by saying, nope…I agree with whatever conspiracy Trump said. Even on here, Russian hoax and Hunter laptop. You’re too ingrained in the conspiracy world, dude. When you have the fact presented to you, you didn’t care.
Of course you have a problem with misinformation being called out

The pee pee dossier ring a bell?

There was Russian collusion stuff coming from the Clinton camp even if there were some charges against folks affiliated with Trump. You can see the nuance right?

The broad narrative they were trying to weave was caught and found to be mostly lies. Some truth mixed in doesn’t absolve the blatant lies that swayed public opinion.