Conducting a crap poll doesn’t affect most pollsters, but when you’re in the betting business, being wrong can be a disaster. Ergo, who are going to believe: MSM leftist pollsters or the professional gambling groups. Unless you suffer some form of impediment such as TDS, you’ll go with the bookies. Here’s an excellent survey of the voting landscape regarding the swing states. It looks like it going to be a “too big to rig” contest.
Polls don’t mean a thing. Voter turnout. If Dems show up they win. If they stay home they lose.
Legalized booking companies depend on accurate prediction. They bet the barn on their ability to handicap contests. IMO, they are far more reliable than other polls. Their very existence depends on their talent for prediction.
Democrats are going to lose this election unless it is rigged.
That’s the same GateWay Pundit that admitted lying about the election fraud, right?
Gotcha.
At least you gave yourself a way out.
Warden- can you cite where the Gateway Pundit admitted to lying about election fraud.
From what I’ve read the parties settled. I haven’t read the details of the settlement. Maybe you have? Please post it for us.
Fair critique. That’s exactly what he did.
When you have to remove 70 articles stating the opposite of your admittance, admit publicly that the two people you spend years claiming were guilty despite court cases and evidence, were told you cannot declare bankruptcy to get out of paying the judgement that you lied, and agree to pay them…you’re admitting you lied. That’s how that works.
Though, even responding to you about any of this is a moot point. You, literally, can have people admit in court they lied and/or saw no evidence of voter fraud and still dismiss it. If there was a single day of your life you displayed any honesty or integrity, it would be worth it. But…that’ll never happen. Again, something tells me most of those around you see and know the same thing.
Nah, nah, that’s the lawyer’s recommending a sound legal strategy, right? Despite being absolutely correct, the lawyers think it’s safer to pay out the butthole and retract previous statements JUST BECAUSE.
1 Like
Would you laugh if the shoe was on the other foot and the Republicans were using the Justice Department to target opponents?
History has some nice examples of this happening.
Warden- can you cite where the Gateway Pundit admitted to lying about election fraud.
From what I’ve read the parties settled. I haven’t read the details of the settlement. Maybe you have? Please post it for us.
I thought we were talking about a defamation lawsuit? The Justice Department isn’t targeting anybody. It’s just some liars paying for their lies.
Perhaps you believe Hoft tried to declare bankruptcy because the lawsuit was going well for him?
So you’re saying that you can cite that The Gateway Pundit “admitted [to] lying” about election fraud?
You guys are always super technical with us. Why don’t you abide by your own standards?
I’m saying that Hoft attempted to declare bankruptcy because these lawsuits were costing him a lot of money.
So that does or doesn’t prove he “admitted [to] lying” about election fraud?
Long time caller- I hang up and listen.
He even posted an official correction to clear their name on his website.
So no citation that he admitted to lying about election fraud? Is that the ruling here?
I mean- there could have been a myriad of reasons they settled.
Your inference may be completely wrong.
We’ve been through this for years with you, and not a single day have you been honest about any of it. Again, these things permeate. Something tells me everyone around you thinks the same thing
So you’re saying there could be other reasons he took down his false claims, stopped making those false claims, posted a retraction about how they were innocent, and tried to declare bankruptcy so he wouldn’t have to pay them?
We’re all ears, GSC. It’s your time to shine. LEt us have it.