Not true
They are popping up to suppress voting and dismantle democracy.
And yet this cheating didn’t happen in any significant way
And to answer your original question, I’ve posted this before but I’ll do so with the latest data:
As I said before, it hasn’t been proven in a court of law, but there is a lot of anecdotal smoke that shady stuff went on. We don’t need to community organize to get low engaged voters to the poll through coercion. It’s easy enough to vote as it is.
You argue like my 10 year old, putting words in people’s mouths and drawing conclusions that aren’t there.
Nothing I said indicates I think the election was stolen. I’m saying that rules were loosened because of COVID, some legislatures broke their own state laws to change the voting rules under the guise of COVID, and voting was in general looser in terms of safeguards than before.
Drop boxes are a perfect example. Going door to door and ballot harvesting should be illegal. Reasonable people see this as an area where cheating can happen.
Nothing I said means I think it occurred on a grand scale to tilt the election. But let’s clean it up.
Hell, did you see the news that Arizona just sent 6,000 erroneous ballots out? Luckily it was caught, but do you think 6,000 erroneous votes can’t swing a state?
Wake up you blind media slurping sheep.
He’s a PHD in this style.
Find me an election in the US without some small scale, inconsequential cheating going on
Voting turnout disagree with you. But don’t let the data help your feelings…
And let’s obv replace the word coerce
That seems like a lot of work, dude. What do I get out of this? Why don’t you look them up and send them and then I’ll make my judgement?
Everything you have said smacks of how you believe the election was stolen. You’ve certainly not come on here saying that you don’t believe it was stolen.
Have an honest moment with yourself.
Kinda like you in the way you see a sexy headline and post it without reading it, only to be told (by people who actually read the article) that it goes against your point? Then you try to walk it back by clarifying your opinion before realizing it won’t work and then you abandon the topic altogether?
Yep. PHD.
The red herrings are amazing.
No one disputes this.
You need to qualify “wide scale” vs “small scale” because definitionally it matters and it’s subjective.
And again- for the 1,000th time. No court allowed an evidentiary hearing on the facts so how can you make such a claim?
Because they laughed your team out of court without merit.
That’s great. My point still stands.
You can laugh all you want as the court but no one can claim the evidence was reviewed and adjudicated.
That’s right. Again, none of the fake attempts passed enough of a smell test for anyone to waste our valuable tax resources to evaluate. You are jumping the horse with the cart and I can’t help your warped brain understand simple logic.
LOL at GSC for always coming back to this. It’s the only defense he has. And it’s a weak one at that.
Amazing that his logic to get to this point is backasswords but he thinks he’s right.
I’m sure he thinks it is a coordinated strategy to get OMB out of office for good. Conspiracy NUTJOB.
He brought it up
He sure did……
And only 1 of us doesn’t have 
in our name