Recommends prosecutions and outlines a myriad of issues in the election.
200,000 ballots transported with no chain of custody among other issues.
I thought this was a nothing burger guys?
Much better read on the subject and links to the exact document as reference so that one doesn’t have to read GWP propaganda for the brain dead mouth breathers.
Again, nothing burger. Glad they can tidy up transportation and signature verification. Just another confirmation bias piece of shit individual who gets his shit shoveled back down his throat daily.
1 Like
I’m surprised GSC didn’t post another random, undated, untitled picture of someone shredding paper.
1 Like
GWP had a direct link. You were just too lazy and biased to read it.
Look- now 51 has evidence from an authority and still rejects it. Lmao!
Brnovich referred Katie Hobbs, the Director of Elections, for criminal prosecution.
But that’s not a big deal lol.
False. He threatened her and then suggested she be investigated.
Found nothing. All the report claimed was it didn’t “look right.”
What the Brnovich report says
Brnovich’s letter describes the county’s signature verification system as “insufficient to guard against abuse,” noting the short amount of time election workers have to look at signatures on ballots.
The Maricopa County Recorder’s Office verified 206,648 signatures on Nov. 4, 2020, averaging out to just 4.6 seconds for each verification. That fast pace leaves the system “vulnerable to error, fraud and oversight,” the report states. However, it does not explain how it arrived at the 4.6 second figure nor does it refer to any kind of standard or guideline for how long a signature check should take.
The number of early ballots rejected in Maricopa County because of problems with their required voter signatures has decreased in the past three election cycles, his office found.
For example, the number rejected because of signatures that don’t match went from 1,451 in the 2016 election to 356 in 2018, the same year that Pima County — which received a total of 302,770 early ballots compared to Maricopa County’s 1,184,791 early ballots — rejected 488 for the same reason.
Brnovich also raised concerns about the transporting of early ballots from drop-off locations to county’s election headquarters, and said it put at risk nearly 20% of the ballots delivered via drop boxes.
His recommendations mirror many of the measures lawmakers have introduced this session, including the need for tighter signature verification on mail-in ballots.
But the report also has an echo of the Cyber Ninjas’ findings, which were at times hedged with an acknowledgment that there could be other reasons for their conclusions.
Brnovich was suspicious of the decline of mismatched signatures on mail-in ballots and suggested it could have been because the county became “less diligent” on signature checks after 2016. That’s the year that Fontes, a Democrat, was elected. However, the report conceded that this was just one explanation and “there could be others.”
Exactly. But he’s still investigating duuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Imaging saying…or typing duuuuuuuuurrrr
This is the little faggot that also typed “prolly”, “totes (or something similar)” and several other feminine teeny bopper type phrases and is the board’s leading smiley face poster
Fuckin flower girl pansy…Maybe that’s why he wears that stupid ass “manly” goatee…Insecurity
Lol, the “interim report” is finally leaked and conservatives are raging that there’s nothing in it!
The GWP got one thing right when it said:
“[The report] did not give any recommendations on rectifying the stolen 2020 election and saving our country. It only suggested changes to elections law in the future.”
Gee, this sounds an awful lot like my analysis of the 96-page audit report…
Okay, but what did I predict about the AG’s followup investigation?
Damn, sounds like I was RIGHT ON THE MONEY.
#SoMuchForTheAlamo
Except for an elections official being referred for criminal charges?
It’s either an intellectual failure or a failure in integrity. But 305 said he’s “down the middle.” A straight shooter.
Certainly it can’t be the latter.
Sorry if I’m late the party on this.
I can’t believe we’re still talking about this.
So 200,000 ballots with no chain of custody is not mass fraud? Lol. You people are insane.
GSC HAS JUST FOUND PROOF OF MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD. THE IMAGE BELOW LEAVES NO DOUBT:
JUST LOOK AT THAT EVIL, GUILTY SMILE.
TRUMP WON!
It’s typical that you have no response. You haven’t had any valid responses on the two boards in 10 years.
I posted a valid response with the above article. Not sure what you’re talking about.
And I find your statement curious considering you’ve literally posted unknown/untitled/undated pictures of people by shredder boxes as definitive proof of voter fraud.
Those “people” were election officials on closed circuit video destroying ballots. But fuck it. No big deal.
How the fuck do you know? The videos literally show nothing that identifies anything.
Just stop. You’re dying to believe something nefarious happened because you HAVE to win.
Because they were the security cameras from the election facility. And the people were identified. But keep on.
