DeKalb County voted 90 percent for Wornock, and DeKalb of course was last reporting their results. I surmise they needed to see how many votes they needed to crook the election. Things just haven’t gotten bad enough in America to bring about sufficient voter wrath to undo incompetent Democrat governance which is THE greatest threat to democracy.
Every loss is a swindle now. Or it could just be that Walker wasn’t a compelling candidate. Either one.
Almost 87%. You think that’s funny? It gets worse.
Dismissing all mail-in ballots, ONLY counting day-of walk-ins, Wornock got over 80% of the vote in Dekalb. Walker was crushed.
So you’re saying the rate of mail ins was even higher. By the way- can you cite your source? Would like to look.
Right here ^^^ is as big a reason as any why people can’t trust results.
Yes, 6.75% higher.
What are you talking about? 90% of the results were reported shortly after 10pm, with a projected winner at 10:30 and a concession at 11.
This is literally everything you asked for, skeeter.
If it is…Then ok… I did not follow this at all. Just going by Bikki’s post. So they were done at the same time as the other counties?
No- it would be higher than the difference because the final numbers are an average right?
And thank you for the link.
From what I can tell, polls closed at 7pm, at 7:15 10% of the votes were tallied, at 8:30 half the votes were tallied and it was neck and neck, by 9 70% of the vote was in and it was 50-50, Walker took a slim late lead at 9:15, Warnock took a slim late lead at 9:20, 9:40 Walker took a lead, 9:50 Warnock took a lead.
(This is showing that “later” votes are benefiting both candidates.)
And the rest what I said above, by 10:15 90% of the votes were in and the results were clearing up, with a projected winner at 10:30.
Walker conceded the election 4 hours after polls closed. This should impress bikki and the French alike.
Oh, yes, you are correct. Advanced voting + mail-ins, Warnock got just under 91%.
In retrospect, Walker was a poor choice of a candidate by Republicans. The election in my view was about voting for the least worst candidate, and unfortunately the worst won. To Herschel, I’d recommend obtaining some Vibranium supplements to enhance his mental acuity. Vibranium is good stuff and does wonders for minority imbibers. Get ready for the oncoming Depression. Winter is coming and may last all year.
LMAO, he was an awful candidate RETROSPECTIVELY AND PROSPECTIVELY. He was horrible and just one of many horrible Republican candidates who fumbled the midterms.
HE WON IN A LANDSLIDE….
BAD CANDIDATE HUH?
@bikki228 YOU SHOULD KNOW BETTER THEN TO ARGEE WITH JUNIOR STUGOTZ……
WHENEVER YOU AGREE SOMETHING IS WRONG……
JUNIOR IS NOT AWAKE YET……
Storm, none of that math proves any conspiracy.
Republicans didn’t come out in strong numbers in the runoff because the Senate control wasn’t at stake.
Warnock can gain a huge bump in early voting and cut into same day voting. Both things can be true. You aren’t proving any fraud with this math, man.
Hate to tell you, but this is the kind of stuff that causes people to label others conspiracy theorists.
1 Like