Team Partisan guy ^^
Not at all. What you wrote reveals deeply how you think.
There’s more hard evidence of the continuing Russian withdrawal from Northern Ukraine.
There are a lot of claims of war crimes: rape, executions, leaving behind mines. It’s important to take everything with a grain of salt, but it’s also important to test the credibility of both sides. Ukraine may or may not be exaggerating the extent of things, but what is Russia’s claim? That “not a single resident” was harmed. This is, of course, complete bunk. Who with a straight face can say an invasion force using missiles and artillery haven’t harmed a single resident?
It’s stuff like this that really discredits Russia.
Another example? Casualty counts of armies and armor. Sure, Ukraine may be fudging the numbers a little higher than US intelligence reports. Meanwhile in Russia it is punishable by jail for journalists to report on casualty numbers.
Who looks like they have more to hide?
I insist that you have completely misinterpreted what I wrote and have applied your own meaning…. Which, funny enough, reveals deeply how you think.
Keep spinning. They’re all dishonest political games to you. You don’t care about the issues, just the appearance of winning the arguments.
A fair and well-deserved approach
I absolutely, unequivocally use the media to make informed decisions. Good journalism is worth its weight in gold. Fuck if I have time to figure out everything by myself or sit around and daydream up alternative realities.
But you clearly don’t use good journalism. Therein lies the problem, sheep…
Name a good journalism source.
What’s your criteria for “good journalism?”
Funny. I just asked Skeeter this exact same thing.
Thanks I thought so
Skeeter answered this twice already on this message board. I believe the most recent late 21 or early 22. It’s getting old with you.
I don’t have a go to site…Reuter’s at times seems decent for me but even they have been leaning left with one-sided “fact” checking. I click on somewhere that I know is not extreme bullshit…read the story and tune out the interpretation.
I think Wall Street Journal seems mostly fair? I remember there was something during either covid or fake race war that I disagreed strongly with their or tone or underlying “truth” that the article was written on them…But when I see a headline from them, I usually click if I have the option between them and someone else. I think New York Post has reported very straight forward and asks legit questions with all the bullshit that today’s liberal cult deflects or writes off as conspiracy theories… They are listed as leaning right.
That’s why finding right people that ask legit questions on social media or wherever are important.
His
Not yours…You are a sheep.
Even if there are similarities…The way 51 leans on “repeating history” (his or the article’s opinion) is so funny
“There are some similarities we can draw to something that has happened before…Fuck it then it’s gospel it has to happen again! The exact same way!” (and then 5 day bratty cunt argument ensues)
You’re wasting your time here GSC…He’s just an argumentative, bratty fucking asshole.
Partisan guy ^
Cornball ^
Doesn’t take partisanship to call out a sheep…Sheep
Partisan guy ^
Move along little feller…Getting smacked around doesn’t getting any easier when you get dull and also unoriginal.
It’s not an opinion. It’s as clear as day. Putin is repeating history.
You’re simply disagreeing with me for the sake of disagreeing. Truth be damned.
No…He is doing some similar things. I am also telling you that only has a limited amount of predictive value going forward.