So basically pay people to deliver bunk ballots en made all day.
Talk about an election fraud scandal. Can’t wait for all of this to hit the mainstream.
One of the guys that was arrested and charged for this apparently made $45,000 doing it? Did I read that right?
He got paid $10 per ballot
1 Like
That’s correct. The fact that some of these people were seen in multiple states tells you this is an orchestrated crime effort.
1 Like
Fizzle to complete FLOP
https://www.kansas.com/news/article261036477.html
What an embarrassment you people are
1 Like
Dj would say this exact thing if he drove everyone of the mules to the ballot boxes all day and night
That’s how partisan, indoctrinated, and desperate he is. It’s a cult.
1 Like
Lol. That article didn’t disprove anything. I read it this morning before you posted. They make a lot of assumptions too. But here’s the kicker, 2000 mules has video footage. They are going to publish the locations of the stash houses. Why would they do that if it was all fake?
You are so far gone that you can’t even admit the possibility that they Might have something and the election might not have been 100% above board.
I’m not sure what you mean. Who said there wasn’t fraud? I bet fraud has existed in every election we’ve ever had.
There isn’t some mass conspiracy where the entire election was stolen. There is a big difference.
The article merely pointed out that the film didn’t prove anything.
Especially since the ones making the claims need to prove something
You know there has to be smoke when the best the establishment media can do is have some 22 year old fact checker try to explain how the geo locating could be off. Leading up to the movie release, there was crickets. After the release, they scrambled to downplay it. They have video. Surprised that wasn’t refuted. No, actually I’m not.
How about the people posing for pictures at 1 or 2 in the morning? Or the same people at multiple drop boxes. Coincidence I’m sure.
400,000 votes could have been affected. They have hundreds of hours of video.
Will be interesting to see it play out.
1 Like
You know there has to be smoke when conservatives are all in a tizzy without proof. But then what else is new?
Why would video be refuted? Their video doesn’t show anything illegal, and they don’t even have video for all the states they claim fraud in.
I’m not following.
Or the same people driving by heavily trafficked areas daily. Almost like they might be on a work schedule or something…
The moon could be made of cheese.
Your playing dumb act gets so old.
You can say you don’t see proof or that movie wouldn’t sway you (doubt you’ve seen it).
But to dismiss it offhand seems a little foolish. It’s the default stance of the left though.
I’ll answer your question since you can’t follow the logic. They have video of folks taking pictures of themselves near drop boxes in the middle of the night. These same folks were seen at other drop boxes in the middle of the night.
Then, they uncovered how these people get paid. They have to take a photo to show that they are actually delivering the goods.
Make sense now?
Sorry, 100% of the information I’m working with is “people posing for pictures at 1 or 2 in the morning.”
I’m not playing dumb. I literally don’t know what that means.
Let there be no doubt that I would never watch that trash.
I’m sure I’ll miss a bunch of slow-motion zooming closeups of people’s faces playing along to troubling music, you know, to tell me how to feel about their slanted production, but I suppose I’ll have to live with that.
Here’s my compromise: When they introduce actual evidence in actual court, I promise I will pay attention. Does that sound fair?
Are you saying people had the audacity to take selfies of themselves voting?!? Next you’ll tell me people take pictures of their food to post on social media.
I’ll grant you it’s a brave new world, but I hardly see the conspiracy.
I think they will be called to task when they publish the location of the stash houses. Seems like they can’t get away with faking that.
There are also ongoing investigations in GA and Stacey Abrams is in the crosshairs. But who cares right?
1 Like
They also used a high threshold (10 or more ballot boxes per mule) to be counted.
Shit is obvious. We called it on the old board. Easiest way to steal an election.
1 Like
It’s like talking to SF over and over and over.
They legit believe the make believe.
As I always say, I can’t fix stupid.
1 Like
Talking to you is a delight
I told you I would care when it was in court.
If you want to start a thread about Stacey Abrams with a link or something, i would probably join in.