It’s how a lot of things work. You don’t like the legislators making laws, vote them out.
The Indiana law seems reasonable to me. It’s 10 weeks with exceptions for rape and incest and also allows for exceptions in the case of fetal deformity.
Right, right…so you don’t get to vote on it, but get to vote on the legislature who then votes on it. I understand how the system works, however, that’s not how you worded it.
So, you can’t vote on the issue, but you can vote on the person and they vote on the issue…right?
I’m sure for you, it does. It doesn’t for Eli Lilly and Cummins
It’s when within 3, 4 days of taking office one of your first orders…of clear utmost emergency is…drum roll…allowing transexuals to compete in women’s sports.
Wokeness is removing the importance of an MCAT to become a doctor
Basically all the things your favorite political party is promoting nowadays. You support the woke cult. You can’t get enough of it…But hey at least you don’t support some republican that said something bad to a reporter somewhere in some bumfuck corner of the country!
sounds like word salad from someone who can’t answer the question
No it sounds like you’re deflecting. I mean you make 20 posts a week about some awful, horrible republican running a stop sign. Or Marjorie Taylor Greene said this, or Tucker Carlson said that…Or the new accusation that Trump is also being investigated for something else… But hey at least you support the woke cult.
He’s doing his best to explain illegal behavior by using teenage-level gotchas.
Now, innocent until proven guilty? Questioning if any proof of bad behavior was found? These are perfectly legitimate stances. Trump being able to do whatever he wants isn’t.
I agree here that the optics are bad IF NOTHING COMES OF THIS.
For Trump’s home to be raided, a string of people needed to sign off on this. A federal judge, Trump-appointed head of the FBI, the attorney general…
That’s why I said this is a pretty big deal. For everyone to go along with this, there had to be a compelling reason. And it does the Dems no good to raid him for no reason.
Which means I expect there to be some form of followup announcement regarding the raid. The FBI must address the elephant in the room, they must explain themselves, at some point.
Instead of making baseless partisan accusations, I will wait for the raid to be explained because, even if they had good intentions, it’s a bad look if nothing comes of it.
Exactly! I have a hard time believing there wasn’t an overwhelming circumstance that justified an unprecedented move like this. If they show a nothing-burger, the FBI and DOJ are soup.
This is the thing none of you understand. I don’t “like” Trump. Out of all the Maga in the world, I’m low on the list. I can barely watch speeches he makes.
I believe Trump is “necessary” because he represents the anti-establishment, pro-nationalist, and Constitutionalist option in politics right now.
And further, out of all the viable options, he is the clearest one to win. DeSantis isn’t as clear a winner as Trump. Neither is Rand Paul or Mike Pompeo. All of those guys present real challenges in not only broad likability, but also name Id, and creating a buzz in the party and those on the fringe.
Trump checks all the boxes which is why I’ll forgive him his sins…. And it’s why they had to cheat and are trying to destroy the man.
I think they need to issue a statement sooner rather than later. A lot of people are pissed about this.
That said, those who believe Trump is the Messiah (GSC) won’t care what public explanation the DOJ gives.
Oh, we know. Your affection for him is much deeper. And don’t pretend that it isn’t. We’ve got years of proof.
First, for the billionth time, no cheating.
Second, you’ll forgive him his sins? How can you forgive him his sins if you don’t think he’s done a single thing wrong? Youve defend him daily for years.
This is a hilarious comeback after being accused of playing semantics.
GSC doesn’t “like” Trump, he just thinks he’s the best candidate for president, was an awesome president last term, and the guy who will save the country.
Yea because you want to conflate a personal feeling for a person with their qualifications.
51 is clearly using the word like and love in personal, intimate ways about my attraction and defense of Trump’s personality and character. That is what I’m directly rebutting.
You can not be a fan of someone personally and still think they check all the prerequisites for a job or office. I don’t know what you’re going on about here but there’s no inconsistency and no “dodge.”
I’m not a fan of Trump’s delivery. I’m not a fan of Trump’s talk first, think later approach. I’m also not a fan of Trump’s liberal side.
There’s a lot of things I do t like about him, but he’s without a doubt the best man to challenge the status quo for a multitude of reasons.