How is pro-illegal immigration policy Catholic? What biblical precedent do we have to support it?
I certainly appreciate the answer but it kind of proves my point. You hold many more liberal values than conservative ones.
Where did I say I supported pro illegal immigration?
I’ll make this simple for you.
Jesus is at the border and a starving family needs to be let in. They’re fleeing their oppressed country. They can’t go back.
What would He do?
You know the answer.
Why would they need to “be let in?”
Why not just fed? Why not help them where they are?
When did Jesus smuggle anyone against the law?
He helped the WHERE THEY WERE!
So…you’re saying to never let them in…to let them sit there by the border waiting for 3 squares a day.
Are you sure you’re Catholic or just pretending to be?
Somebody save me the read…Does he mention antifa trying to burn a courthouse in Portland while people were inside? Because if not then it’s a double standard.
More whataboutism.
And you’re making a judgement without reading it! I’m shocked!
I’m saying a nation has laws.
Romans 13:1-2 says: “Obey the government, for God is the One who has put it there. There is no government anywhere that God has not placed in power. So those who refuse to obey the law of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow.”
pretty cut and dry there 51.
The second part I’m trying to say is to “help them where they are.”
If you feel this passionately about helping Central Americans… send money directly to them. Sponsor one of them. Go visit and bring them what they need.
But don’t tell me that I hav to live with them and pay for them.
Ahh, GSC. I’ve figured it out. You’re a Catholic when convenient.
What about that whole thing where Jesus said “love one another?” Pretty sure by “punishment” the Bible didn’t mean family separations. But cool.
I read a lot of shit and have a lot of work to do…I don’t have time to read every single article obviously.
Lol
This dude just keeps reaching. Flat out embarrasses himself.
The only ones embarrassing themselves are the self righteous who claim one thing and clearly demonstrate the other.
You are just too stupid and blindly brainwashed to follow what I’m actually demonstrating.
It’s hard to prove anything you’d like to “demonstrate” you just said you don’t have time to read articles posted.
Trump did lose, it’s comments where you claim bullshit with no factual evidence that allows more idiots into the political system.
Get rid of gerrymandering, and have term limits in congress.
Pardon me but can you rephrase? Are you saying you disagree.
THIS IS WHY I LAUGH AND CALL YOU GUYS STUGOTZS…
THERE IS NO ANALYSIS…
IT IS ALL PERSONAL WITH YOU PEOPLE…
YOU TALK ABOUT THE WAY I THINK “ONE WAY” YET THE DIFFERENCE IS ALL MY POSITIONS ARE MADE WITH DATA/FACTS NOT FEELINGS…
YOU PEOPLE MAKE DECISIONS AND TAKE STANCES BEING COMPLETELY UNEDUCATED OR JUST REFUSING TO ACKNOWLEDGE IT…
EVERY SINGLE SIGN OF ELECTION TAMPERING WAS DONE IN THIS ELECTION…
LITERALLY EVERY SIGN,
YET YOU MAKE UNREASONABLE EXCUSES NOT SUPPORTED BY DATA TO EXPLAIN THE OUTCOME YOU WANTED…
YOU HAVE A GUY (JUNIOR) ON HERE DEFENDING DOMINION/SMARTMATIC LIKE THEY WERE NOT VENEZUELAN OWNED AND HAD STORIES WRITTEN ABOUT THEIR MACHINES USED TO CHEAT…
THERE ARE STORIES AS FAR BACK AS 2004-2007 ABOUT THE MACHINES BEING RIGGED…
TRUMP WON…
TRUMP
WON IN A LANDSLIDE LIKE I SAID HE WOULD…
TRUMP GOT MORE VOTES THEN OBAMA WHICH IS A FACT AND MORE THEN WE KNOW…
I’M SORRY ONLY A REALLY BIAS OR REALLY STUPID PERSON BELIEVES A GUY THAT CAN’T ATTRACT FLIES COULD GET THE MOST VOTES EVER WHILE NOT DRAWING 100 PEOPLE AT HIS EVENTS WHILE THE GUY THAT HAS THE LARGEST FOLLOWING, CROWDS AND PARADES OF ALL TIME GETS THE MOST VOTES EVER…
THE COUNTRY IS RED / INDEPENDENT AND GETTING MORE RED / INDEPENDENT EVERYDAY AS “SCIENCE” IS BEING EXPOSED EVERYDAY…
THE FACTS BACK IT UP IT DOESN’T BACK UP YOUR NONSENSE…
Acknowledge what? That there was election fraud? I’ve said there was election fraud. I just don’t think it amounted to the volume needed to switch the election.
I haven’t looked at any of your articles because they are all opinion pieces, not working papers. Go ahead and find something backed by a data scientist that used AI to invalidate the results.
Then why are the Republicans not writing laws to removed those said machines from use VS. attempting to outlaw mail-in ballots? Furthermore, why didn’t the republicans do this in 2004-2007 when Bush was in control OR 2016-2019 when Trump was?
Opinion not backed by data.
If the numbers are not correct then how do you know this for a FACT? Crazy that one minute you want to claim the numbers are NOT right and the next you want to use them to show how big of a win Trump almost had.
So your facts are based on how many people showed up to Trump rallies?
I’ve looked at a good number of working papers from data scientists. None that are screaming with their hair on fire saying the election was stolen. Some have said, there is a small chance some election fraud happened but not enough to flip the presidential election.
Again, I believe fraud happened just like it happens every day in banking. Was it enough to steal the president, not likely.
Yeah…like that “position” you took that Biden wouldn’t be sworn in on 1/20?
I’d love to know where you got that reliable data from!
Why are you trying to have a conversation with storm?! Of the three hardlining trumpers in here, Garden is the only one that will carry a conversation at minimum.
Storm is q crazy, and skeeter wants you to go fuck yourself and everything else on the planet, throws slurs in and ends with a mom comment.
I carry convos with people who deserve to have a convo carried with em.
Not fucking delusional, borderline retards who have been brainwashed to the extent of no return.