This isn’t a gun to the head situation. Your question is just stupid.
You try to save everyone.
As for the election - we all know. You know. The constitution does exist. Part of it talks about the final counting of electoral votes.
And his supporters (you) ignored the constitution and tried to stop it.
So don’t try to lecture me when you fully support efforts that are unconstitutional.
You keep saying this but it isn’t my point. I never said “abandon the elderly.”
One more time. My point is… in the grand scheme of pandemics… with all things being considered… we are very very very fortunate… that this virus seems to be most lethal on the elderly and not children under 10.
51- you’re essentially having a conversation with yourself. I’m not saying “don’t help the elderly” I’m saying that everyone recognizes that children are much more sacred than the old. And instead of acknowledging it, because it’s self evident, you keep trying to change the conversation.
It’s what my wife and daughter do when I have them on the ropes.
Why can’t you just admit that children will always be more important than old people?
Wouldn’t you sacrifice your own self for any child if it came to be that way? I would. Nothing wrong with what I’m saying.
Bad people on all sides. When everyone realizes it isn’t about the color of the uniform but the person in the uniform, we will start to move forward as a society to find better solutions.
Lol - my analogy wasn’t an illustration of “who should we treat for Corona virus.”
It was an illustration of “which life has more value to society.”
But even if you wanted to we could prove it with coronavirus.
There’s one dose left that will save 1 life. There’s a 2 year old and an 87 year old with covid - both are close to death and the bike will guarantee one of their lives.
Who do you give it to.
Again- I’m not saying our policy should reflect this. I’m saying that THANK GOD ITS THE OLD AT RISK AND NOT THE YOUNG.