Douchebag
Pretty sure that’s not what happened.
His lawyer, Joseph Sibley, told the court: “While Giuliani does not admit to plaintiffs’ allegations, he - for purposes of this litigation only - does not contest the factual allegations.”
Ted Goodman, a political adviser to Mr Giuliani, said in a statement: "This is a legal issue, not a factual issue.
“Those out to smear the mayor are ignoring the fact that this stipulation is designed to get to the legal issues of the case.”
No contest and admission are not identical. They even state “while Giuliano does not admit to plaintiff’s allegations.”
Such bad journalism.
You mean the guy being criminally charged and also held liable for defamation, who doesn’t “contest the factual allegations” must be telling the truth, huh?
Not bad journalism. You’re a dishonest guy, simple enough. You’ve never once had a leg to stand on with this election fraud bullshit and you’ve known it the entire time. You simply haven’t even a concept of integrity, much less any actual integrity. Rudy, of course, is liable and is going to pay those two women. You, of course, still have no care of sympathy for two women who were slandered and defamed by a hack like Rudy that led to death threats and harassment.
In the end, this says more about you than them. It shows what little you’re working with inside. Very weak man
No- you just don’t understand the legal process and how it works. Even in your own clip there- I reiterate- there’s no “admission,” but rather a “concession”
And if you had half a brain you’d realize that this all has to do with “burden of proof.”
Giuliano’s lawyers know that it would be almost impossible to prove his “statement of fact” in this case regarding the plaintiffs…. So their only recourse is to “concede” but it’s not “an admission.” Lol.
Start to educate yourself.
LIABLE.
#Scoreboard.