I believe I admitted that I didn’t.
But if I did I’d probably find an over sample somewhere and there’s a possibility that a question was worded in a less than optimal way…. You’re free to look at it and do the analysis.
I like the results
I believe I admitted that I didn’t.
But if I did I’d probably find an over sample somewhere and there’s a possibility that a question was worded in a less than optimal way…. You’re free to look at it and do the analysis.
I like the results
Yea, we did. Your “poll” suggests a bunch of people “think” the election was stolen. Great. That’s what some people (republicans, not all people) “think.”
But you can’t tout someone’s opinion of something as proof it actually happened. This is what you’re doing, and it’s stupid because it’s simply not true.
Yeah that’s kind of our point. You point to the polls you like, and say all the others are BS.
How dare you 51
Our point exactly.
Lindell May be back on crack. Why Trump doesn’t move away from this crackhead is beyond me.
Trump has fewer and fewer supporters these days. Many have turned on him and his claims, so he probably can’t afford to turn away those he still has. You’re right, though. Lindell’s a nut.
With all due respect I think this is going to turn out to be one of your worst predictions ever. My readers that Trump support has actually gone up
I think it’s about the same as its always been. The GOP Is dying to separate themselves from him….but they can’t quite figure out how to do this while keeping his rabid fan base happy.
You need to qualify that with “establishment” before GOP.
But even they know the risk in leaving Trump. House Leader McCarthy has moved from condemning Trump to backing him this past couple of months. He knows he needs him to be speaker.
Tea leaves.
Pathetic isn’t it? A guy like Cruz, who trump insulted mercilessly, called his wife ugly and said his dad had a part in JFK’s assassination, bends over to him.
So many in the GOP/establishment have zero balls.
It’s not a prediction. I’m talking about all the Republicans and reporters and once supporters who have been in the news speaking out against Trump and the election fraud hoax.
For the record…There was not one…Literally not one person besides the commie cunt djrion (who is just a delusional fucking asshole, meltdown type lib telling us all how we all have to fuck up her lives to make a utopia)…
That spoke a negative thing about the job Trump was doing before covid…Not one
A lot of you hated his rhetoric and his arrogance, and I can’t say I blame you. But every single of one you thought he was lock city for a 2nd term and were complaining very little to zero about anything.
51 thoughts?
One scientist?
You need to do better than that.
Lol…They are everywhere you fucking dope!
Turn your little fucking can off.
This is an amazing statement.
Says that guy who admitted the other day that he interprets polls only in the way that he wants to and ignores the ones he doesn’t like.
Stop getting your info from GWP and tik tok.
Lindell is an American success story. His products are excellent, and he employs alot of people right here in the USA. He’s a very decent guy and has traditional American values. Were he my neighbor, I am sure I’d like him. A cunt? Definitely not! He’s a guy unlike Warden I wouldn’t even think about drowning out in the bayou.
51- another silly statement. That’s not what I said.
I said, every poll has a sampling and a methodology. The gold standard is when the sample matches the actual numbers for the area being polled.
So let’s say the poll is in NJ and the poll sampled 60% republicans and 20% democrats and 20% independents…. That would be a really stupid poll to rely on because NJ is about 55% Democrat. So you’d have to “re-weight” the poll to make the sample match the actual demographic it is surveying.
Also, I mentioned looking at the questions. If a poll gives 2 answers and both are bad answers but the respondent must answer, how can we really rely on it? Some polls give the respondent an out with not answering. Some allow them to customize answers and some are highly inflexible and offer a, b, c etc…
So just stop with the nonsense already. You always try to twist my words around.
That is literally what you said. Now you’re trying to move the goal posts.
Here’s a piece of what you said:
Blockquote
I don’t believe in polls. But YOU all do.
Then you said:
Blockquote
And while I hate polls you can derive some knowledge from them.
Then you said:
Blockquote
You can derive information from polls but you have to understand the methodology so you can “unskew it”….
Then you said:
Blockquote
But if I did I’d probably find an over sample somewhere and there’s a possibility that a question was worded in a less than optimal way…. You’re free to look at it and do the analysis.
I like the results
You have literally admitted, in this thread alone, that you don’t trust polls, but will use them as gospel when it fits your narrative.
Which is a long way of saying, you’re full of shit.