IF YOU CAN’T UNDERSTAND WHAT KAVANAUGH WAS SAYING I WILL SIMPLIFY IT FOR YOU…
YOU AIDED CHINA AT ALL…TREASON
YOU AIDED IRAN AT ALL…TREASON
YOU HELPED THEM TRY TO STEAL THE ELECTIONS…TREASON
YOU ATTACKED YOUR OWN COUNTRY (9/11)…TREASON
YOUR SMALL STUGOTZ MINDS ARE ABOUT TO BE BLOWN WITH ALL YOUR CONSPIRACIES…
GSC it’s one thing to think there was election fraud - albeit - with no proof.
It’s quite another to believe that Trump is still president, is letting Biden “play” president along with believing things like earthquakes in Haiti are related to treason trials.
He’s got a right to think that. And I have a right to believe it’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever read.
When did Congress declare war against China, Iran, and Russia? If not, when did they declare the governments of being terrorists governments?
The last treason cases were connected to WWII.
Furthermore, the US military isn’t exactly considered the pillar of truth after the 20 years of telling the public and congress the Afghanistan war is progressing well only to see the government fall apart in weeks.
Putz, I said there would be localized mask mandates and limits put on gatherings in Blue cities with high cases at the time but nothing like 2020 lockdowns.
All the shit happening in other countries has zero application to US policy on Covid. A bunch of Asian countries have elected to use lockdowns to stop the spread, including democratic. We are not going backwards and the new variants appear to get past the lockdowns anyway.
Would the “War on Terrorism” cover all of those countries?
Did we officially declare war on Afghanistan or on terrorists? I’m asking, don’t know the answer.
As I read it, there are two roads to go down to have these cases move from US Courts to Military Courts. Why is that important? US Courts = innocent until proven guilty. Military Courts = guilty until proven innocent.
Treason requires aiding the enemy you are at WAR with at the time the acts were committed.
In this case, we were at war on two fronts.
Afghanistan- may as well mark this off.
Broadly against Terrorists under the 9/11 act " The President has broad constitutional power to take military action in response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Congress has acknowledged this inherent executive power in both the War Powers Resolution and the Joint Resolution passed by Congress on September 14, 2001.
The President has constitutional power not only to retaliate against any person, organization, or State suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks on the United States, but also against foreign States suspected of harboring or supporting such organizations.
The President may deploy military force preemptively against terrorist organizations or the States that harbor or support them, whether or not they can be linked to the specific terrorist incidents of September 11."
Clinton’s trial would have to prove that she was somehow involved in 9/11.
